Overview and analysis of electronic health record standards

A fundamental requirement for achieving continuity of care is commonly accepted to be the integration and interoperability of different clinical oriented systems towards the realization of a “longitudinal” Electronic Healthcare Record. To enable seamless integration of various kinds of IT applications into a healthcare network, a commonly accepted framework based on international relevant standards has become an urgent need. However, there is much marketplace confusion today in the healthcare domain, due to the variety of overlapping or complementary interoperability standards and initiatives, which have evolved over the years addressing integration of applications at different levels. This chapter provides a brief overview of the most relevant Electronic Healthcare Record standards, by examining the level of interoperability and functionality they provide, in terms of context, structure, access services, multimedia support, and security, to provide healthcare decision-makers and system integrators with a clear perspective regarding the capabilities and limitations of each standard.

[1]  S. Deftereos,et al.  A Java-based Electronic Healthcare Record Software for Beta-thalassaemia , 2001, Journal of medical Internet research.

[2]  Martina Ziefle,et al.  Smart Healthcare Applications and Services: Developments and Practices , 2010 .

[3]  Phillip Olla,et al.  The M-Health Reference Model: An Organizing Framework for Conceptualizing Mobile Health Systems , 2006, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[4]  Even Åby Larsen,et al.  Agent-Based Patient Scheduling , 2008 .

[5]  Ilias Iakovidis,et al.  Towards personal health record: current situation, obstacles and trends in implementation of electronic healthcare record in Europe , 1998, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[6]  Mikko Korpela,et al.  A process for specifying integration for multi-tier applications in healthcare , 2003, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[7]  Marco Eichelberg,et al.  A survey and analysis of Electronic Healthcare Record standards , 2005, CSUR.

[8]  N. Wickramasinghe Encyclopedia of Healthcare Information Systems , 2008 .

[9]  H. Mcdonald,et al.  Effects of computerized clinical decision support systems on practitioner performance and patient outcomes: a systematic review. , 2005, JAMA.

[10]  Richard Smith What clinical information do doctors need? , 1996, BMJ.

[11]  John E. Mattison,et al.  Review: The HL7 Clinical Document Architecture , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[12]  Dipak Kalra,et al.  A CORBA-based integration of distributed electronic healthcare records using the Synapses approach , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine.

[13]  Pierce Story,et al.  Management Engineering for Effective Healthcare Delivery: Principles and Applications , 2011 .

[14]  Patrice Degoulet,et al.  Integration of medical applications: the 'mediator service' of the SynEx platform , 2000, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[15]  Wei Gao,et al.  Exploring a UML Profile Approach to Modeling Web Services in Healthcare , 2007, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[16]  Yajiong Xue,et al.  User Acceptance of Computerized Physician Order Entry: An Empirical Investigation , 2006, Int. J. Heal. Inf. Syst. Informatics.

[17]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  DICOM structured reporting: Part 1. Overview and characteristics. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

[18]  Amy Price,et al.  Cognitive Rehabilitation Computer Brain Solutions: Prevention Powerhouse or a Warm Fuzzy Wannabe? A Perspective in Neuroplasticity and Practicality , 2012 .

[19]  Hans-Peter Meinzer,et al.  DICOM structured reporting: Part 2. Problems and challenges in implementation for PACS workstations. , 2004, Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.