Nanofiltration of highly concentrated salt solutions up to seawater salinity

Abstract Recently, Nanofiltration (NF) membranes have been employed in pre-treatment unit operations in both thermal and membrane seawater desalination processes. This has resulted in reduction of chemicals used in pre-treatment processes as well as lowering the energy consumption and water production cost and, therefore, has led to a more environmentally friendly processes. In order to predict NF membrane performance, a systematic study on the filtration performance of selected commercial NF membranes against brackish water and seawater is required. In this study, three commercial nanofiltration membranes (NF90, NF270, N30F) have been used to treat highly concentrated (NaCl) salt solutions up to 25,000 ppm, a salinity level similar to that of seawater. The membranes were firstly characterized using the Atomic Force Microscopy (AFM) technique. Pore size and pore size distribution obtained from AFM measurements were used to analyse both experimental data of pure water permeation and data obtained from salt rejection. The main parameters studied in this paper are feed pressure and salt concentration. The experimental data of this work was correlated and analysed using the Spigler-Kedem model. In particular, the reflection coefficient ( σ ) of all studied membranes and the solute permeability of the salt ( P s ) have been determined for all membranes and at all salinity levels studied. For a salinity of 5000 ppm and a pressure of 9 bars, the experimental results showed that NF90 could achieve a salt rejection up to 95%, whereas its rejection dropped to 41% at a salinity of 25,000 ppm and the same pressure. Rejection levels achieved by NF270 have been in range of 11–29% while N30F gave the lowest rejection in the range of 3–6%.

[1]  Peter Eriksson,et al.  Nanofiltration extends the range of membrane filtration , 1988 .

[2]  Mohammad A.K. Al-Sofi,et al.  Seawater desalination — SWCC experience and vision , 2001 .

[3]  M. Afonso,et al.  Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions , 2001 .

[4]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Modelling the retention of ionic components for different nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[5]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A demonstration plant based on the new NF-SWRO process , 2000 .

[6]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  CHARACTERISATION OF NANOFILTRATION MEMBRANES FOR PREDICTIVE PURPOSES - USE OF SALTS, UNCHARGED SOLUTES AND ATOMIC FORCE MICROSCOPY , 1997 .

[7]  Serena Bandini,et al.  Nanofiltration modeling: the role of dielectric exclusion in membrane characterization , 2003 .

[8]  A. Mohammad,et al.  Characterisation of nanofiltration membranes using atomic force microscopy , 2005 .

[9]  André Deratani,et al.  Properties of cellulose acetate nanofiltration membranes. Application to brackish water desalination , 2004 .

[10]  J. Gilron Experimental analysis of negative salt rejection in nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[11]  Nidal Hilal,et al.  A comprehensive review of nanofiltration membranes:Treatment, pretreatment, modelling, and atomic force microscopy , 2004 .

[12]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  Nanofiltration as a means of achieving higher TBT of ≥ 120°C in MSF , 1998 .

[13]  K. S. Spiegler,et al.  Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes , 1966 .

[14]  Pedro Prádanos,et al.  Pore size distributions based on AFM imaging and retention of multidisperse polymer solutes: Characterisation of polyethersulfone UF membranes with dopes containing different PVP , 2001 .

[15]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Atomic force microscopy studies of nanofiltration membranes: surface morphology, pore size distribution and adhesion , 2000 .

[16]  D. Y. Kim,et al.  Correlations of chemical structure, atomic force microscopy (AFM) morphology, and reverse osmosis (RO) characteristics in aromatic polyester high-flux RO membranes , 1997 .

[17]  S. Nakao,et al.  The electrostatic and steric-hindrance model for the transport of charged solutes through nanofiltration membranes , 1997 .

[18]  W. Richard Bowen,et al.  Characterisation and prediction of separation performance of nanofiltration membranes , 1996 .

[20]  G. Hagmeyer,et al.  Modelling the salt rejection of nanofiltration membranes for ternary ion mixtures and for single salts at different pH values , 1998 .

[21]  Ata M. Hassan,et al.  A new approach to membrane and thermal seawater desalination processes using nanofiltration membranes (Part 1) , 1998 .

[22]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Permeability of composite membranes. Part 1.—Electric current, volume flow and flow of solute through membranes , 1963 .

[23]  Bart Van der Bruggen,et al.  Distillation vs. membrane filtration: overview of process evolutions in seawater desalination , 2002 .

[24]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Influence of membrane surface properties on initial rate of colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes , 2001 .

[25]  Enrico Drioli,et al.  Energetic and exergetic analysis of an integrated membrane desalination system , 1999 .

[26]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration , 1998 .

[27]  Nandakishore Rajagopalan,et al.  Consider nanofiltration for membrane separations , 1994 .

[28]  A. Katchalsky,et al.  Permeability of composite membranes , 1963 .