The Politics of Information: Problem Definition and the Course of Public Policy in America

How does the government decide what's a problem and what isn't? Like individuals, Congress is subject to the "paradox of search." If policy makers don't look for problems, they won't find those that need to be addressed. But if they carry out a thorough search, they will almost certainly find new problems-and with the definition of each new problem comes the possibility of creating a program to address it. With The Politics of Attention, leading policy scholars Frank R. Baumgartner and Bryan D. Jones demonstrated the central role attention plays in how governments prioritize problems. Now, with The Politics of Information, they turn the focus to the problem-detection process itself, showing how the growth or contraction of government is closely related to how it searches for information and how, as an organization, it analyzes its findings. Better search processes that incorporate more diverse viewpoints lead to more intensive policy-making activity. Similarly, limiting search processes leads to declines in policy-making. At the same time, the authors find little evidence that the factors usually thought to be responsible for government expansion - partisan control, changes in presidential leadership, and shifts in public opinion - can be systematically related to the patterns they observe.

[1]  Justin Peck,et al.  Can Congress Do Policy Analysis? The Politics of Problem Solving on Capitol Hill , 2014 .

[2]  A. Witteloostuijn,et al.  Ecology of National Rule Birth: A Longitudinal Study of Dutch Higher Education Law, 1960-2004 , 2010 .

[3]  Paul J. Quirk,et al.  The Politics Of Deregulation , 1985 .

[4]  E. Walker The politics of information: Problem definition and the course of public policy in America , 2015 .

[5]  B. Jones,et al.  Agendas and instability in American politics , 1993 .

[6]  John D. Wilkerson,et al.  Congress and the Politics of Problem Solving , 2013 .

[7]  M. Schulz Limits to Bureaucratic Growth: The Density Dependence of Organizational Rule Births. , 1998 .

[8]  Martin Gilens,et al.  Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America , 2012 .

[9]  T. Moe Vested Interests and Political Institutions , 2015 .

[10]  Nicole C. Raeburn Changing Corporate America from Inside Out , 2004 .

[11]  A. Gerber,et al.  The Politicization of Evidence-Based Medicine: The Limits of Pragmatic Problem Solving in an Era of Polarization , 2011 .

[12]  B. Jones The politics of attention , 2005 .

[13]  Frank Dobbin,et al.  Inventing Equal Opportunity , 2009 .

[14]  Thomas H. Hammond Toward A General Theory Of Hierarchy: Books, Bureaucrats, Basketball Tournaments, And The Administrative Structure Of The Nation-State , 1993 .

[15]  K. Okma Dismantling the Welfare State? Reagan, Thatcher, and the Politics of Retrenchment , 1998 .

[16]  P. Mortensen,et al.  How Politics Shapes the Growth of Rules , 2015 .

[17]  M. McBeth,et al.  A Narrative Policy Framework: Clear Enough to Be Wrong? , 2010 .

[18]  Eric M. Patashnik,et al.  Reforms at Risk: What Happens After Major Policy Changes Are Enacted , 2008 .

[19]  A. Gerber,et al.  Promoting the General Welfare: New Perspectives on Government Performance , 2006 .

[20]  Thomas H. Hammond,et al.  Learning in Hierarchies , 2007 .

[21]  B. Jones,et al.  The Politics of Attention: How Government Prioritizes Problems , 2006 .