A Longitudinal Comparison of Sustainability Learning between Men and Women in Engineering and Nursing Programmes

For many years, Higher education institutions have been engaging with sustainability, many focussing on environmental ones. In this context, two phenomena have arisen that have, usually, been studied separately: (1) engineering schools have been at the forefront of sustainability efforts; and (2) women have tended to be more concerned about of environmental sustainability than men are. This paper is aimed at analysing the differences in perception between engineering students and nursing students at the University of Gavle, Sweden. Engineering and nursing programmes are practice-oriented with different foci on sustainability and usually being dominated by male and female students, respectively. The data for this article were based on two surveys carried out during 2010 and 2013, in which the same students answered the same questions at the beginning and at the end of their studies. Principal component analysis and regressions were carried out to analyse the survey answers. The results show that engineering programmes and gender affect actions positively. The results also show that engineering students increased their sustainability performance significantly more than nursing students. To improve environmental sustainability, it is important to promote the presence of women in engineering schools, and at the same time, social science oriented programmes (such as nursing) could learn from the efforts and action taken by engineering schools, so that sustainability is taught and learnt in a more holistic way.

[1]  Michael O. Rodgers,et al.  Assessing curricula contribution to sustainability more holistically: Experiences from the integration of curricula assessment and students' perceptions at the Georgia Institute of Technology , 2013 .

[2]  Heng Tao Shen,et al.  Principal Component Analysis , 2009, Encyclopedia of Biometrics.

[3]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Developing collaborative and sustainable organisations , 2008 .

[4]  Diana Lorena Cardona Montoya,et al.  Situación sociodemográfica y nivel de satisfacción con la formación de los graduados de una universidad privada de la ciudad de Manizales, Colombia , 2016 .

[5]  S. McComb,et al.  Impact of pedagogical approaches on cognitive complexity and motivation to learn: Comparing nursing and engineering undergraduate students. , 2016, Nursing outlook.

[6]  Annie R. Pearce,et al.  The Systematic Course Development Process: Building a Course in Sustainable Construction for Students in the U.S.A. , 2009 .

[7]  Rodrigo Lozano,et al.  Addressing the attitudinal gap towards improving the environment: a case study from a primary school in Slovenia , 2013 .

[8]  Zhilei Yao,et al.  Sustainable Development at University : comparison of students’ knowledge, awareness and actions , 2010 .

[9]  R. Lozano Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: an empirical example from Cardiff University , 2010 .

[10]  Agneta Sundström,et al.  Implementation of sustainability in universities as perceived by faculty and staff – a model from a Swedish university , 2015 .

[11]  L. Velazquez,et al.  Sustainable university: what can be the matter? , 2006 .

[12]  Lynnette Zelezny,et al.  New Ways of Thinking about Environmentalism: Elaborating on Gender Differences in Environmentalism , 2000 .

[13]  Sharon Sassler,et al.  The missing women in STEM? Assessing gender differentials in the factors associated with transition to first jobs. , 2017, Social science research.

[14]  Agneta Sundström,et al.  Learning about Sustainability—What Influences Students’ Self-Perceived Sustainability Actions after Undergraduate Education? , 2016 .

[15]  Xueliang Yuan,et al.  A critical assessment of the Higher Education For Sustainable Development from students' perspectives – a Chinese study , 2013 .