A Matlab Tool for Subjective Assessment of Image Quality

Image quality assessment (IQA) is to evaluate the performance of image processing techniques, and acts as an important way to promote their further developments. In objective evaluation, the image quality of a to-be-evaluated image is related to its difference with the ground-truth image which is estimated by using various metrics, such as the average error and the mean square error. However, an objective evaluation is often impossible to exactly match the perception of human vision system. Therefore, a reliable subjective assessment of image quality is always necessary. In this paper, a Matlab tool is designed to facilitate this evaluation task from the following four aspects. First, every to-be-evaluated image is presented to viewers with a random order and without any label; that is, a blind evaluation is conducted. Second, after a round of evaluation, the order of the to-be-evaluated images will be randomly changed and a second round of blind evaluation will be required; that is, a double-confirmed evaluation is achieved. Third, during the evaluation, the current image (either the ground truth or a to-be-compared one) can be enlarged by the viewers for a close watching. In particular, when this image is enlarged, other images in the same group will be automatically enlarged at the same portion for fascinating the comparison; that is, a synchronous magnification is realized. The final evaluation result is taken to be a mean of the scores of the two evaluation rounds, provided that their difference is below a given threshold; that is, a automatic analysis is achieved. The tool is publicly available at https://github.com/hdddx/SubjectiveEvaluation.

[1]  T. Tominaga,et al.  Performance comparisons of subjective quality assessment methods for mobile video , 2010, 2010 Second International Workshop on Quality of Multimedia Experience (QoMEX).

[2]  Bülent Sankur,et al.  Statistical evaluation of image quality measures , 2002, J. Electronic Imaging.

[3]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Structural and Information Theoretic Approaches to Image Quality Assessment , 2018, Multi-Sensor Image Fusion and Its Applications.

[4]  Alan C. Bovik,et al.  Image information and visual quality , 2006, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[5]  P. Sunna,et al.  SAMVIQ—A New EBU Methodology for Video Quality Evaluations in Multimedia , 2005 .

[6]  Gustavo de Veciana,et al.  An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[7]  A. Bovik,et al.  A universal image quality index , 2002, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[8]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Perceptual Image Coding Based on a Maximum of Minimal Structural Similarity Criterion , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing.

[9]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Video quality assessment based on structural distortion measurement , 2004, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[10]  Eero P. Simoncelli,et al.  Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[11]  Don E. Pearson,et al.  A calibration method for continuous video quality (SSCQE) measurements , 2000, Signal Process. Image Commun..

[12]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Why is image quality assessment so difficult? , 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[13]  Zhou Wang,et al.  Structural Approaches to Image Quality Assessment , 2005 .

[14]  Kai-Kuang Ma,et al.  ESIM: Edge Similarity for Screen Content Image Quality Assessment , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[15]  Deepak S. Turaga,et al.  No reference PSNR estimation for compressed pictures , 2002, Proceedings. International Conference on Image Processing.

[16]  Weisi Lin,et al.  Perceptual visual quality metrics: A survey , 2011, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[17]  ITU-T Rec. P.910 (04/2008) Subjective video quality assessment methods for multimedia applications , 2009 .

[18]  King Ngi Ngan,et al.  Adaptive Block-Size Transform Based Just-Noticeable Difference Profile for Images , 2009, PCM.

[19]  Stephen J. Glick,et al.  Region of interest evaluation of SPECT image reconstruction methods using a realistic brain phantom , 1996 .