A Developmental Neural Model of Visual Word Perception

A neurally plausible model of how the process of visually perceiving a letter in the context of a word is learned, and how such processing Occurs in adults is proposed. The model consists of a collection of abstract letter feature detector neurons and their interconnections. The model also includes a learning rule that specifies how these interconnections evolve with experience. The interconnections between neurons can be interpreted as representing the spatially redundant, sequentially redundant, and transgraphemic information in letter string displays. Anderson, Silverstein, Ritz, and Jones’s (1977) “Brain-State-in-a-Box” (BSB) neural mechanism is then used to implement the proposed model. The resulting system makes explicit qualitative predictions using both letter recognition accuracy and reaction time as dependent measures. In particular, the model offers an integrated explanation of some experiments involving manipulations of orthographic regularity, masking, case alternations, and experience with words. The similarities and differences between the model and models proposed by Adams (1979) and McClelland and Rumelhart (1961) are also discussed.

[1]  James C Johnston,et al.  A test of the Sophisticated Guessing Theory of word perception , 1978, Cognitive Psychology.

[2]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Visual factors in word perception , 1973 .

[3]  D W Massaro,et al.  Letter information and orthographic context in word perception. , 1979, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[4]  Teuvo Kohonen,et al.  Self-Organization and Associative Memory , 1988 .

[5]  Jerome A. Feldman,et al.  Connectionist Models and Their Properties , 1982, Cogn. Sci..

[6]  Marilyn Jager Adams,et al.  Models of word recognition , 1979, Cognitive Psychology.

[7]  David Zipser,et al.  Feature Discovery by Competive Learning , 1986, Cogn. Sci..

[8]  James L. McClelland Putting Knowledge in its Place: A Scheme for Programming Parallel Processing Structures on the Fly , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  James F. Juola,et al.  Isolating visual units in the perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[10]  L. Henderson Orthography and Word Recognition in Reading , 1982 .

[11]  W. Estes The Locus of Inferential and Perceptual Processes in Letter Identification. , 1975 .

[12]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: part 1.: an account of basic findings , 1988 .

[13]  G. M. Reicher Perceptual recognition as a function of meaninfulness of stimulus material. , 1969, Journal of experimental psychology.

[14]  A Pollatsek,et al.  Familiarity affects visual processing of words. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  J. Baron,et al.  An analysis of the word-superiority effect☆ , 1973 .

[16]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: Part 2. The contextual enhancement effect and some tests and extensions of the model. , 1982, Psychological review.

[17]  J F Juola,et al.  The development of visual information processing skills related to reading. , 1978, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[18]  Jack W. Silverstein,et al.  Reply to Grossberg , 1978 .

[19]  M. Mason Reading Ability and Letter Search Time: Effects of Orthographic Structure Defined by Single-Letter Positional Frequency. , 1975 .

[20]  James A. Anderson,et al.  Cognitive and psychological computation with neural models , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[21]  Stephen A. Ritz,et al.  Distinctive features, categorical perception, and probability learning: some applications of a neural model , 1977 .

[22]  D. D. Wheeler Processes in word recognition , 1970 .

[23]  R W Schvaneveldt,et al.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect. , 1982, Psychological review.

[24]  Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al.  A Learning Algorithm for Boltzmann Machines , 1985, Cogn. Sci..

[25]  Richard R. Rosinski,et al.  Children’s use of orthographic structure in word discrimination , 1972 .

[26]  James L. McClelland,et al.  The role of familiar units in perception of words and nonwords , 1977 .

[27]  Lester A. Lefton,et al.  Orthographic structure and reading experience affect the transfer from iconic to short-term memory. , 1974 .

[28]  P Smolensky Harmony Theory: A Mathematical Framework for Stochastic Parallel Processing. , 1983 .

[29]  D W Massaro,et al.  Orthographic regularity, positional frequency, and visual processing of letter strings. , 1977, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[30]  J. L. Mcclelland Preliminary letter identification in the perception of words and nonwords. , 1976, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  L. Lefton,et al.  English orthography: Relation to reading experience , 1973 .

[32]  E. Gibson Principles of Perceptual Learning and Development , 1969 .