The current emitted by highly conducting Taylor cones

When a liquid meniscus held at the exit of a metallic capillary tube is charged to a high voltage V , the free surface often takes the form of a cone whose apex emits a steady microjet, and thus injects a certain charge I and liquid volume Q per unit time into the surrounding gas. This work deals with liquids with relatively large conductivities K , for which the jet diameter d j is much smaller than the diameter d n of the capillary tube. In the limit d j / d n → 0, the structure of the jet ( d j and I , in particular) becomes independent of electrostatic parameters such as V or the electrode configuration, being governed mostly by the liquid properties and flow rate Q. Furthermore, the measured current is given approximately by I = f (e) (γ QK /e) ½ for a wide variety of liquids and conditions (e, and γ are, respectively, the dielectric constant of the liquid and the coefficient of interfacial tension; f (e) is shown in figure 11). The following explanation is proposed for this behaviour. Convection associated with the liquid flow Q transports the net surface charge towards the cone tip. This upsets the electrostatic surface charge distribution slightly at distances r from the apex large compared to a certain charge relaxation length λ, but substantially when r ∼ λ. When the fluid motion is modelled as a sink flow, λ is of the order of r * = ( Q ee 0 / K ) $\frac13$ (e 0 is the electrical permittivity of vacuum). If, in addition, the surface charge density is described through Taylor's theory, the corresponding surface current convected towards the apex scales as I s ∼ (γ QK /e) ½ , as observed for the spray current. The sink flow hypothesis is shown to be realistic for sufficiently small jet Reynolds numbers. In a few photographs of ethylene glycol cone jets, we find the rough scaling d j ∼ 0.4 r * for the jet diameter, which shows that the jet forms as soon as charge relaxation effects set in. In the limit e [Gt ] 1, an upper bound is found for the convected current at the virtual cone apex, which accounts for only one-quarter of the total measured spray current. The rest of the charge must accordingly reach the head of the jet by conduction through the bulk.

[1]  J. Mora,et al.  The effect of charge emission from electrified liquid cones , 1992, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[2]  David P. H. Smith,et al.  The Electrohydrodynamic Atomization of Liquids , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[3]  M. Cloupeau,et al.  Electrostatic spraying of liquids in cone-jet mode , 1989 .

[4]  John Zeleny,et al.  Instability of Electrified Liquid Surfaces , 1917 .

[5]  G. Benassayag,et al.  In situ high voltage tem observation of an electrohydrodynamic (EHD) ion source , 1985 .

[6]  Richard D. Smith,et al.  Principles and practice of electrospray ionization—mass spectrometry for large polypeptides and proteins , 1991 .

[7]  Geoffrey Ingram Taylor,et al.  Disintegration of water drops in an electric field , 1964, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A. Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[8]  K. C. Thong,et al.  The production of charged monodisperse fuel droplets by electrical dispersion , 1971 .

[9]  M. Cloupeau,et al.  Electrostatic spraying of liquids: Main functioning modes , 1990 .

[10]  P. W. Kidd,et al.  Parametric studies with a single-needle colloid thruster. , 1968 .

[11]  M. D. Gabovich Liquid-metal ion emitters , 1983 .

[12]  P. Kebarle,et al.  Effect of the conductivity of the electrosprayed solution on the electrospray current. Factors determining analyte sensitivity in electrospray mass spectrometry , 1991 .

[13]  I. Hayati,et al.  Mechanism of stable jet formation in electrohydrodynamic atomization , 1986, Nature.

[14]  John Zeleny,et al.  The Electrical Discharge from Liquid Points, and a Hydrostatic Method of Measuring the Electric Intensity at Their Surfaces , 1914 .

[15]  J. Rosell-Llompart,et al.  Generation of submicron monodisperse aerosols in electrosprays , 1990 .

[16]  I. Hayati,et al.  Investigations into the mechanism of electrohydrodynamic spraying of liquids: II. Mechanism of stable jet formation and electrical forces acting on a liquid cone , 1987 .

[17]  A. Gomez,et al.  Remarks on the paper “Generation of micron-sized droplets from the Taylor cone” , 1993 .

[18]  R. J. Pfeifer,et al.  Parametric studies of electrohydrodynamic spraying. , 1966 .

[19]  M. Mann,et al.  Electrospray ionization for mass spectrometry of large biomolecules. , 1989, Science.

[20]  I. Hayati,et al.  Investigations into the mechanisms of electrohydrodynamic spraying of liquids. I: Effect of electric field and the environment on pendant drops and factors affecting the formation of stable jets and atomization , 1987 .