Syntactic Accuracy in Sentence Production: The Case of Gender Disagreement in Italian Language-Impaired and Unimpaired Speakers

We report three experiments with language-impaired and unimpaired speakers of Italian, assessing: (1) whether nonsyntactic (both conceptual and morphophonological) information is used in encoding the syntactic structure of a sentence; and (2) whether the integration of syntactic and non-syntactic information can be differentially impaired in Broca's aphasics. In all the experiments, gender agreement errors between a noun, subject of the sentence, and a predicative adjective were induced by presenting participants with sentence fragments to complete. The first experiment assessed the role of conceptual information. The second experiment investigated whether agreement is disrupted by the presence of another noun with different gender in the subject noun phrase. In the last experiment, we assessed whether morphophonological cues are used. We found that both populations used nonsyntactic information (both conceptual and morphophonological). However, patients were disrupted to a greater extent than normals by the presence of a gender mismatching noun in the subject noun phrase. The results are discussed in terms of how information integration during production is achieved and how it can be disrupted in aphasia.

[1]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Inducing Agrammatic Profiles in Normals: Evidence for the Selective Vulnerability of Morphology under Cognitive Resource Limitation , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[3]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  The lexical nature of syntactic ambiguity resolution , 1994 .

[4]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Book Reviews: Head-driven Phrase Structure Grammar and German in Head-driven Phrase-structure Grammar , 1996, CL.

[5]  Herman H.J. Kolk,et al.  Agrammatism, paragrammatism and the management of language , 1992 .

[6]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[7]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Working memory doesn't work: a critique of miyake et al.'s capacity theory of aphasic comprehension deficits , 1995 .

[8]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  Incremental syntactic tree formation in human sentence processing: A cognitive architecture based on activation decay and simulated annealing , 1989 .

[9]  David Caplan,et al.  Sentence Production by Aphasic Patients in a Constrained Task , 1998, Brain and Language.

[10]  M. F. Garrett,et al.  The Analysis of Sentence Production1 , 1975 .

[11]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Computing Subject Verb agreement in speech: The role of semantic and morphological information , 1995 .

[12]  G. Waters,et al.  Verbal working memory and sentence comprehension , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[13]  Patrizia Bisiacchi,et al.  L'aachner Aphasie Test (Aat) II. Proprietà Psicometriche Della Versione Italiana , 1987 .

[14]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Syntactic transparency and sentence interpretation in aphasia , 1987 .

[15]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  How two aphasic patients compute Subject Verb agreement , 1994 .

[16]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement , 1993 .

[17]  H. Kolk,et al.  On-line Sensitivity to Subject-Verb Agreement Violations in Broca′s Aphasics: The Role of Syntactic Complexity and Time , 1994, Brain and Language.

[18]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[19]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  Lectures on Government and Binding , 1981 .

[20]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Cue validity and sentence interpretation in English, German, and Italian , 1984 .

[21]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[22]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[23]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  Syntactic Facilitation in Agrammatic Sentence Production , 1998, Brain and Language.

[24]  G. Vigliocco,et al.  When Sex and Syntax Go Hand in Hand: Gender Agreement in Language Production , 1999 .

[25]  Myrna F Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism II. Production , 1980, Brain and Language.

[26]  H. Kolk,et al.  A Time-Based Approach to Agrammatic Production , 1995, Brain and Language.

[27]  Gary S. Dell,et al.  The retrieval of phonological forms in production: tests of predictions from a connectionist model , 1988 .

[28]  A. Friederici.  The Time Course of Syntactic Activation During Language Processing: A Model Based on Neuropsychological and Neurophysiological Data , 1995, Brain and Language.

[29]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The word order problem in agrammatism I. Comprehension , 1980, Brain and Language.

[30]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .

[31]  Herman Kolk,et al.  Judgments of Semantic Anomaly in Agrammatic Patients: Argument Movement, Syntactic Complexity, and the Use of Heuristics , 1996, Brain and Language.

[32]  Kerry Kilborn,et al.  Selective impairment of grammatical morphology due to induced stress in normal listeners: Implications for aphasia , 1991, Brain and Language.

[33]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints , 1996, Cognition.

[34]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Sensitivity to grammatical structure in so-called agrammatic aphasics , 1983, Cognition.

[35]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  A sketchbook of production problems , 1991 .

[36]  Elizabeth Bates,et al.  Differential Sensitivity to Errors of Agreement and Word Order in Broca's Aphasia , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  M. Garrett,et al.  Grammatical Gender Is on the Tip of Italian Tongues , 1997 .

[38]  J. Nicol,et al.  Separating hierarchical relations and word order in language production: is proximity concord syntactic or linear? , 1998, Cognition.