Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior to Pedestrians at Two-Lane Roundabout Approaches

Drivers are less likely to comply with the “Yield to Pedestrians” sign at roundabouts than at other types of controlled intersections. The aim of this study was to identify the contributing factors affecting the likelihood of drivers yielding to pedestrians at two-lane roundabouts. The analysis used logistic regression to model the likelihood of drivers yielding based on several factors. The models were applied to 1,150 controlled pedestrian crossings at the entry and exit legs of two-lane approaches to six roundabouts across the country. The logistic regression models that were developed support prior research that found that the likelihood of drivers yielding at the entry leg of a roundabout was higher than at the exit. Drivers tended to yield to pedestrians carrying a white cane more often than they did to sighted pedestrians. Drivers traveling in the far lane, relative to pedestrian location, had a lower probability of yielding to the pedestrian. As speed increased, the probability of drivers yielding decreased. At the exit leg of the roundabout, drivers turning right from the adjacent lane had a lower propensity of yielding than did drivers coming from other directions. The logistic regression models also quantified the effect of each of these factors on the propensity of driver yielding. The models included variables that were specific to each study location and explained the impact size of each study location on the probability of yielding. The results of the research can be used to isolate factors that may increase yielding (such as lower roundabout approach speeds) and can feasibly be incorporated into microsimulation algorithms to model driver yielding at roundabouts.

[1]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Event-Based Modeling of Driver Yielding Behavior at Unsignalized Crosswalks. , 2011, Journal of transportation engineering.

[2]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Empirical Behavioral Models to Support Alternative Tools for the Analysis of Mixed-Priority Pedestrian-Vehicle Interaction in a Highway Capacity Context. , 2011, Procedia, social and behavioral sciences.

[3]  Paul E. Ponchillia,et al.  Street crossing by sighted and blind pedestrians at a modern roundabout , 2005 .

[4]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Development and Implementation of Conflict-Based Assessment of Pedestrian Safety to Evaluate Accessibility of Complex Intersections , 2012, Transportation research record.

[5]  M. Baucus Transportation Research Board , 1982 .

[6]  Duane R. Geruschat,et al.  Driver Behavior in Yielding to Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at Roundabouts , 2005 .

[7]  Paul E. Ponchillia,et al.  Blind and Sighted Pedestrians' Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[8]  George F. List,et al.  Appendixes to NCHRP Report 572: Roundabouts in the United States , 2006 .

[9]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Working Concept of Accessibility , 2009, Transportation research record.

[10]  Bastian Jonathan Schroeder,et al.  A Behavior-Based Methodology for Evaluating Pedestrian-Vehicle Interaction at Crosswalks , 2008 .

[11]  Robert Wall Emerson,et al.  Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities , 2011 .

[12]  George F. List,et al.  Roundabouts in the United States , 2007 .

[13]  D L Harkey,et al.  PEDSAFE: PEDESTRIAN SAFETY GUIDE AND COUNTERMEASURE SELECTION SYSTEM , 2004 .

[14]  黒田 孝次,et al.  Highway Capacity Manual改訂の動向--テイラ-教授の講演より , 1984 .

[15]  Nagui M Rouphail,et al.  Mixed-Priority Pedestrian Delay Models at Single-Lane Roundabouts , 2010, Transportation research record.