Some comments on the main fire retardancy mechanisms in polymer nanocomposites

Barrier formation and increasing the melt viscosity are addressed as the two main general fire retardancy mechanisms of polymer nanocomposites. They result in specific impacts on fire properties that consequentially cause varying flame retardancy efficiency in different fire tests. The barrier formation retards mainly flame spread (peak of heat release rate) in developing fires, but does not reduce fire load (total heat evolved), ignitability or flammability (limiting oxygen index, UL 94). Furthermore, this flame retardancy effect increases with increasing irradiation and vanishes with decreasing irradiation. The increased melt viscosity prevents dripping, which is beneficial or disadvantageous depending on the fire test used. In some test, it become the dominant influence, transforming self-extinguishing samples into flammable materials or causing wicking. Advantages and the limits are sketched comprehensively for exploiting the main general fire retardancy mechanisms of polymer nanocomposites. It is concluded that barrier formation and changing the melt viscosity in nanocomposites are not sufficient for most applications, but must be accompanied by additional mechanisms in special systems or in combination with other flame retardants. Copyright © 2006 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

[1]  Bernhard Schartel,et al.  Red Phosphorus-Controlled Decomposition for Fire Retardant PA 66 , 2002 .

[2]  T. D. Fornes,et al.  Nylon 6 nanocomposites: the effect of matrix molecular weight , 2001 .

[3]  Mingshu Yang,et al.  Flame retardant mechanism of polymer/clay nanocomposites based on polypropylene , 2005 .

[4]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Effect of melt processing conditions on the extent of exfoliation in organoclay-based nanocomposites , 2001 .

[5]  Jeffrey W. Gilman,et al.  Flammability and thermal stability studies of polymer layered-silicate (clay) nanocomposites , 1999 .

[6]  B. Schartel,et al.  Some comments on the use of cone calorimeter data , 2005 .

[7]  Charles A. Wilkie,et al.  Fire and Polymers IV: Materials and Concepts for Hazard Prevention , 2005 .

[8]  S. Duquesne,et al.  Elaboration of EVA–nanoclay systems—characterization, thermal behaviour and fire performance , 2003 .

[9]  R. Mülhaupt,et al.  Combustion behaviour of EVA/Fluorohectorite nanocomposites , 2001 .

[10]  C. A. Wilkie,et al.  Thermal and Fire Studies on Polystyrene-Clay Nanocomposites , 2000 .

[11]  M. Abdel-Goad,et al.  Fire behaviour of polyamide 6/multiwall carbon nanotube nanocomposites , 2005 .

[12]  Donald R Paul,et al.  Rheological behavior of multiwalled carbon nanotube/polycarbonate composites , 2002 .

[13]  Takashi Kashiwagi,et al.  NANOCOMPOSITES : A REVOLUTIONARY NEW FLAME RETARDANT APPROACH , 1997 .

[14]  B. Schartel,et al.  Combustion behaviour of epoxide based nanocomposites with ammonium and phosphonium bentonites , 2003 .

[15]  R. Krishnamoorti,et al.  Shear response of layered silicate nanocomposites , 2001 .

[16]  Thomas Reisinger,et al.  A rheological method to compare the degree of exfoliation of nanocomposites , 2003 .

[17]  Jeffrey W. Gilman,et al.  Characterization of Polymer-Layered Silicate (Clay) Nanocomposites by Transmission Electron Microscopy and X-Ray Diffraction: A Comparative Study , 2003 .

[18]  B. Schartel,et al.  Phosphonium‐modified layered silicate epoxy resins nanocomposites and their combinations with ATH and organo‐phosphorus fire retardants , 2006 .

[19]  C. A. Wilkie.  An Introduction to the Use of Fillers and Nanocomposites in Fire Retardancy , 2005 .

[20]  Philippe Dubois,et al.  Preparation and Properties of Layered Silicate Nanocomposites Based on Ethylene Vinyl Acetate Copolymers , 2001 .

[21]  Bernhard Schartel,et al.  Layered silicate polymer nanocomposites: new approach or illusion for fire retardancy? Investigations of the potentials and the tasks using a model system , 2004 .