Multi crteria decision making and its applications : a literature review

This paper presents current techniques used in Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) and their applications. Two basic approaches for MCDM, namely Artificial Intelligence MCDM (AIMCDM) and Classical MCDM (CMCDM) are discussed and investigated. Recent articles from international journals related to MCDM are collected and analyzed to find which approach is more common than the other in MCDM. Also, which area these techniques are applied to. Those articles are appearing in journals for the year 2008 only. This paper provides evidence that currently, both AIMCDM and CMCDM are equally common in MCDM.

[1]  Sushil Kumar,et al.  Analytic hierarchy process: An overview of applications , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[2]  Mohamed Benrejeb,et al.  Choquet integral for criteria aggregation in the flexible job-shop scheduling problems , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[3]  Elina Madetoja,et al.  Multiobjective process line optimization under uncertainty applied to papermaking , 2008 .

[4]  Slobodan P. Simonovic,et al.  A new methodology for water resources multicriteria decision making under uncertainty , 2008 .

[5]  Hoda A. ElMaraghy,et al.  Integrated supply chain design using multi-criteria optimization , 2008 .

[6]  Zhongsheng Hua,et al.  A DS-AHP approach for multi-attribute decision making problem with incomplete information , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[7]  Hsu-Shih Shih,et al.  Incremental analysis for MCDM with an application to group TOPSIS , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[8]  Orlando Durán,et al.  Computer-aided machine-tool selection based on a Fuzzy-AHP approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[9]  Wei-Chih Wang,et al.  Improving AHP for construction with an adaptive AHP approach (A3) , 2008 .

[10]  Chungwon Lee,et al.  Evaluation of driver satisfaction of travel information on variable message signs using fuzzy aggregation , 2008 .

[11]  L Diaz Balteiro MAKING FORESTRY DECISIONS WITH MULTIPLE CRITERIA: A REVIEW AND AN ASSESSMENT , 2008 .

[12]  John-Paris Pantouvakis,et al.  A compromise programming model for site selection of borrow pits , 2008 .

[13]  Weijian Mi,et al.  An integration of bidding-oriented product conceptualization and supply chain formation , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[14]  John Wang,et al.  A Comparison and Scenario Analysis of Leading Data Mining Software , 2008, Int. J. Knowl. Manag..

[15]  K.K. Pochampally,et al.  A Multiphase Fuzzy Logic Approach to Strategic Planning of a Reverse Supply Chain Network , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing.

[16]  Jiuh-Biing Sheu,et al.  A hybrid neuro-fuzzy analytical approach to mode choice of global logistics management , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[17]  Richard F. Hartl,et al.  Nature-inspired metaheuristics for multiobjective activity crashing , 2008 .

[18]  Wei-Shen Tai,et al.  A new evaluation model for intellectual capital based on computing with linguistic variable , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[19]  Chen-Tung Chen,et al.  A comprehensive model for selecting information system project under fuzzy environment , 2009 .

[20]  Brian Henson,et al.  A multiple stakeholders' approach to strategic selection decisions , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[21]  Anastasios A. Economides,et al.  A Compound Real Option and AHP Methodology for Evaluating ICT Business Alternatives , 2009, Telematics Informatics.

[22]  Popi Konidari,et al.  The wholesale natural gas market prospects in the Energy Community Treaty countries , 2008, Oper. Res..

[23]  P. Sridhar,et al.  Multi-Criteria Decision Making in Sensor Networks , 2008, IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine.

[24]  Hajo A. Reijers,et al.  Development of a decision-making strategy to improve the efficiency of BPR , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[25]  Gwo-Hshiung Tzeng,et al.  Combining fuzzy AHP with MDS in identifying the preference similarity of alternatives , 2008, Appl. Soft Comput..

[26]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  FAHP Sensitivity Analysis for Measurement Nonprofit Organizational Performance , 2008 .

[27]  V. Venus,et al.  Modelling susceptibility of coral reefs to environmental stress using remote sensing data and GIS models , 2008 .

[28]  Heidi A. Taboada,et al.  Multi-objective scheduling problems: Determination of pruned Pareto sets , 2008 .

[29]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Transboundary Water Policies: Assessment, Comparison and Enhancement , 2008 .

[30]  Risto Lahdelma,et al.  Elevator planning with stochastic multicriteria acceptability analysis , 2008 .

[31]  Dagmar Haase,et al.  A multicriteria approach for flood risk mapping exemplified at the Mulde river, Germany , 2009 .

[32]  Kazuhiko Ohe,et al.  Relationship between risk information on total colonoscopy and patient preferences for colorectal cancer screening options: Analysis using the Analytic Hierarchy Process , 2008, BMC health services research.

[33]  William Ho,et al.  Integrated analytic hierarchy process and its applications - A literature review , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[34]  Taho Yang,et al.  Using simulation and multi-criteria methods to provide robust solutions to dispatching problems in a flow shop with multiple processors , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[35]  Wen-Chin Chen,et al.  A fuzzy AHP and BSC approach for evaluating performance of IT department in the manufacturing industry in Taiwan , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[36]  Tai-Chang Hsia,et al.  Measuring the readability performance (RP) of aircraft maintenance technical orders by fuzzy MCDM method and RP index , 2008 .

[37]  Metin Dağdeviren,et al.  Developing a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (AHP) model for behavior-based safety management , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[38]  Andrés L. Medaglia,et al.  A multiobjective model for the selection and timing of public enterprise projects , 2008 .

[39]  Valérie Dhaevers,et al.  A multicriteria approach to rank scheduling strategies , 2008 .

[40]  Alberto Tellaeche,et al.  A new vision-based approach to differential spraying in precision agriculture , 2008 .

[41]  Günther Ruhe,et al.  A systematic approach for solving the wicked problem of software release planning , 2007, Soft Comput..

[42]  E. Triantaphyllou,et al.  Ranking irregularities when evaluating alternatives by using some ELECTRE methods , 2008 .

[43]  Kuo-Chen Hung,et al.  An enhanced method and its application for fuzzy multi-criteria decision making based on vague sets , 2008, Comput. Aided Des..

[44]  K. Hipel,et al.  A case-based distance method for screening in multiple-criteria decision aid ☆ , 2008 .

[45]  S. Hajkowicz,et al.  Evaluation of Dairy Effluent Management Options Using Multiple Criteria Analysis , 2008, Environmental management.

[46]  H. Vacik,et al.  Population viability risk management (PVRM) for in situ management of endangered tree species—A case study on a Taxus baccata L. population , 2008 .

[47]  S. G. Li,et al.  The inventory management system for automobile spare parts in a central warehouse , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[48]  A. Kaka,et al.  Culture change through the use of appropriate pricing systems , 2008 .

[49]  Ming-Tien Tsai,et al.  Fuzzy Decision Making for Market Positioning and Developing Strategy for Improving Service Quality in Department Stores , 2008 .

[50]  Joseph W.K. Chan,et al.  Product end-of-life options selection: grey relational analysis approach , 2008 .

[51]  Nagahanumaiah,et al.  Computer aided rapid tooling process selection and manufacturability evaluation for injection mold development , 2008, Comput. Ind..

[52]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Development of a fuzzy FMEA based product design system , 2008 .

[53]  Patrick Meyer,et al.  Progressive methods in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2009, 4OR.

[54]  Ahti Salo,et al.  Robust portfolio modeling with incomplete cost information and project interdependencies , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[55]  Maged S. Morcos,et al.  Modelling resource allocation of R&D project portfolios using a multi‐criteria decision‐making methodology , 2008 .

[56]  Han-Lin Li,et al.  A fuzzy ranking method with range reduction techniques , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[57]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Robot selection using an integrated approach based on quality function deployment and fuzzy regression , 2008 .

[58]  J. O. Jabera,et al.  Evaluation of conventional and renewable energy sources for space heating in the household sector , 2007 .

[59]  Esra Karasakal,et al.  A Parallel between Regret Theory and Outranking Methods for Multicriteria Decision Making Under Imprecise Information , 2008 .

[60]  Metin Dagdeviren,et al.  Decision making in equipment selection: an integrated approach with AHP and PROMETHEE , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[61]  Oswald Marinoni,et al.  Suitability analysis for sand and gravel extraction site location in the context of a sustainable development in the surroundings of Zaragoza (Spain) , 2008 .

[62]  Pan Bin,et al.  Study on Supplier Selection Based on AHP and BP Neural Network , 2008, First International Workshop on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (WKDD 2008).

[63]  Malcolm James Beynon,et al.  The lean improvement of the chemical emissions of motor vehicles based on preference ranking: A PROMETHEE uncertainty analysis , 2008 .

[64]  Christos D. Zaroliagis,et al.  Multiobjective Optimization: Improved FPTAS for Shortest Paths and Non-Linear Objectives with Applications , 2006, Theory of Computing Systems.

[65]  Kai Tat Ng,et al.  A Multiple Criteria Decision-Making Knowledge-Based Scheme for Real-Time Power Voltage Control , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics.

[66]  Adam Wierzbicki,et al.  A multi-criteria approach to fair and efficient bandwidth allocation , 2008 .

[67]  Yury Nikulin,et al.  Multicriteria airport gate assignment and Pareto simulated annealing , 2008 .

[68]  Jacques Pictet,et al.  Extended use of the cards procedure as a simple elicitation technique for MAVT. Application to public procurement in Switzerland , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[69]  E. Ertugrul Karsak,et al.  Using data envelopment analysis for evaluating flexible manufacturing systems in the presence of imprecise data , 2008 .

[70]  Tugba Efendigil,et al.  A holistic approach for selecting a third-party reverse logistics provider in the presence of vagueness , 2008, Comput. Ind. Eng..

[71]  János Fülöp,et al.  A method for approximating pairwise comparison matrices by consistent matrices , 2008, J. Glob. Optim..

[72]  Tsung-Yu Chou,et al.  A fuzzy multi-criteria decision model for international tourist hotels location selection , 2008 .

[73]  Muh-Cherng Wu,et al.  A multiple criteria decision for trading capacity between two semiconductor fabs , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[74]  Eleonora Bottani,et al.  An adapted multi-criteria approach to suppliers and products selection—An application oriented to lead-time reduction , 2008 .

[75]  Keith W. Hipel,et al.  Screening in multiple criteria decision analysis , 2008, Decis. Support Syst..

[76]  Christian Fonteix,et al.  Weights determination of OWA operators by parametric identification , 2008, Math. Comput. Simul..

[77]  Pankaj Gupta,et al.  Asset portfolio optimization using fuzzy mathematical programming , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[78]  Yildiz Esra Albayrak A Fuzzy Linear Programming Model for Multiattribute Group Decision Making: An Application to Knowledge Management , 2008, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[79]  Umut Rifat Tuzkaya,et al.  Multiple criteria evaluation of current energy resources for Turkish manufacturing industry , 2008 .

[80]  Pablo Aragonés Beltrán,et al.  An AHP-based evaluation procedure for Innovative Educational Projects : A face-to-face vs. computer-mediated case study , 2008 .

[81]  Jian-Bo Yang,et al.  Ship selection using a multiple-criteria synthesis approach , 2008 .

[82]  B. Noble,et al.  Strategic Environmental Assessment of Greenhouse Gas Mitigation Options in the Canadian Agricultural Sector , 2008, Environmental management.

[83]  María Teresa Lamata,et al.  Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process in Maintenance Problem , 2008, IEA/AIE.

[84]  Pin-Yu Chu,et al.  A fuzzy AHP application in government-sponsored R&D project selection☆ , 2008 .

[85]  Wei-Wen Wu,et al.  Choosing knowledge management strategies by using a combined ANP and DEMATEL approach , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[86]  Gilberto Montibeller,et al.  Supporting the allocation of software development work in distributed teams with multi-criteria decision analysis , 2008 .

[87]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain , 2008 .

[88]  Y. Ilker Topcu,et al.  ANP application for evaluating Turkish mobile communication operators , 2008, J. Glob. Optim..

[89]  Felix T.S. Chan,et al.  Flexible decision modeling of reverse logistics system: A value adding MCDM approach for alternative selection , 2009 .

[90]  Stefan Hajkowicz,et al.  A Review of Multiple Criteria Analysis for Water Resource Planning and Management , 2007 .

[91]  Müjde Erol Genevois,et al.  A Fuzzy Multiattribute Decision Making Model to Evaluate Human Resource Flexibility Problem , 2008, J. Multiple Valued Log. Soft Comput..

[92]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[93]  Ralph E. Steuer,et al.  Multiple criteria decision making combined with finance: A categorized bibliographic study , 2003, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[94]  Ezgi Aktar Demirtaş,et al.  An integrated multiobjective decision making process for supplier selection and order allocation , 2008 .

[95]  Salvatore Greco,et al.  Ordinal regression revisited: Multiple criteria ranking using a set of additive value functions , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[96]  Rajiv Khosla,et al.  Measuring the relative performance for leading fabless firms by using data envelopment analysis , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[97]  M. Zarghami,et al.  Stochastic-fuzzy multi criteria decision making for robust water resources management , 2009 .

[98]  Luis C. Dias,et al.  An algorithm for ordinal sorting based on ELECTRE with categories defined by examples , 2008, J. Glob. Optim..

[99]  Yuh-Wen Chen,et al.  A multi-objective geographic information system for route selection of nuclear waste transport , 2008 .

[100]  Marc Gravel,et al.  Pareto memetic algorithm for multiple objective optimization with an industrial application , 2008, J. Heuristics.

[101]  Li Qi,et al.  Two-level DEA approaches in research evaluation , 2008 .

[102]  James G. Dolan,et al.  Risk communication formats for low probability events: an exploratory study of patient preferences , 2008, BMC Medical Informatics Decis. Mak..

[104]  Gareth Edwards-Jones,et al.  The development of appropriate ecological criteria and indicators for community forest conservation using participatory methods: A case study in northeastern Thailand , 2008 .

[105]  Youssef Diab,et al.  Implementing a public transport line: multi-criteria decision-making methods that facilitate concertation , 2008, Oper. Res..

[106]  Cheng-Ru Wu,et al.  Using expert technology to select unstable slicing machine to control wafer slicing quality via fuzzy AHP , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[107]  David W. Coit,et al.  Pruned Pareto-optimal sets for the system redundancy allocation problem based on multiple prioritized objectives , 2008, J. Heuristics.

[108]  Chia-Yon Chen,et al.  A fuzzy multiple criteria comparison of technology forecasting methods for predicting the new materials development , 2008 .

[109]  Manfred J. Lexer,et al.  Multi-criteria evaluation of multi-purpose stand treatment programmes for Finnish boreal forests under changing climate , 2008 .

[110]  Pandian Vasant,et al.  Possibilistic optimization in planning decision of construction industry , 2008 .

[111]  Shang Hwa Hsu,et al.  A fuzzy CBR technique for generating product ideas , 2008, Expert Syst. Appl..

[112]  Selin Soner Kara,et al.  A hybrid fuzzy MCDM approach to machine tool selection , 2008, J. Intell. Manuf..

[113]  J. Cardina,et al.  Case Study of an Integrated Framework for Quantifying Agroecosystem Health , 2008, Ecosystems.

[114]  Qingwei Chen,et al.  A multi-objective optimization evolutionary algorithm incorporating preference information based on fuzzy logic , 2010, Comput. Optim. Appl..