Evaluation of permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil through laboratory tests

Abstract The objective of this paper is to examine the permeability characteristics of geosynthetic layers under confinement with soils having relatively low permeability. For this purpose, a large permeameter was custom designed and a series of permeability tests were carried-out by varying soil type and number of geosynthetic layers. Further, effect of provision of sand cushion and the thickness of sand cushion on permeability characteristics was also examined. Normal stress was increased in intervals of 50 kPa up to 200 kPa. With an increase in normal stress, a decrease in the permeability characteristics of a geosynthetic-reinforced soil was observed. The permeability characteristics were found to improve significantly with the provision of sand cushion and an increase in its thickness. Based on the definition of equivalent coefficient of permeability of stratified soils for parallel flow, an equation for estimating coefficient of permeability of soil–geosynthetic system with and without sand cushion is proposed. Considering the application of geosynthetics in reinforced slopes and walls with low-permeable backfill soils, a suitable geosynthetic with a thin layer of sand cushion is recommended. This in turn can also help in enhancing the pore-water pressure dissipation.

[1]  Myoung-Soo Won,et al.  Internal deformation behavior of geosynthetic-reinforced soil walls , 2007 .

[2]  Richard J. Bathurst,et al.  DESIGN MANUAL FOR SEGMENTAL RETAINING WALLS , 1993 .

[3]  Bindumadhava,et al.  Technique for Using Fine-Grained Soil in Reinforced Earth , 1991 .

[4]  M. R. Abdi,et al.  Strength enhancement of clay by encapsulating geogrids in thin layers of sand , 2009 .

[5]  A. Sridharan,et al.  Permeability of Two-Layer Soils , 2002 .

[6]  Chung-Sik Yoo,et al.  Case History of Geosynthetic Reinforced Segmental Retaining Wall Failure , 2006 .

[7]  Huabei Liu,et al.  Long-term behavior of GRS retaining walls with marginal backfill soils , 2009 .

[8]  Kenneth S Inouye,et al.  FIELD EVALUATION OF THE LONG-TERM PERFORMANCE OF GEOCOMPOSITE SHEET DRAINS , 2001 .

[9]  J. Masounave,et al.  Hydraulic behavior of synthetic non‐woven filter fabrics , 1982 .

[10]  Brendan C. O'Kelly,et al.  On the interface shear resistance of a novel geogrid with in-plane drainage capability , 2008 .

[11]  R. Koerner,et al.  Water and air transmissivity of geotextiles , 1984 .

[12]  S. J. DeBerardino.  Drainage Principles and the Use of Geosynthetics , 1992 .

[13]  R. Rowe,et al.  Hydraulic behaviour of soil–geocomposite layers in slopes , 2005 .

[14]  Ali Tolooiyan,et al.  A comprehensive method for analyzing the effect of geotextile layers on embankment stability , 2009 .

[15]  Kazuya Yasuhara,et al.  Clogging and flow characteristics of a geosynthetic drain confined in soils undergoing consolidation , 2004 .

[16]  Braja M. Das,et al.  Advanced Soil Mechanics , 2019 .

[17]  Fumio Tatsuoka,et al.  HYDRAULIC CONDUCTIVITY OF GEOTEXTILES UNDER TYPICAL OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS , 1993 .

[18]  Ennio M. Palmeira,et al.  Drainage and filtration properties of non-woven geotextiles under confinement using different experimental techniques , 2002 .