Hydraulically Actuated Muscle ( HAM ) Exo-Musculature

— The hydraulically actuated Exo-Musculature, consisting of a network of artificial hydro-muscles, can be rapidly assembled and utilized as either perform-alone or wearable, human body-symbiotic robotic system. Its fundamental unit is a novel hydraulically actuated muscle (HAM), which is inspired by the capabilities of biological muscles. The HAM design has certain advantages over natural muscles, such as being able to maintain a position without expending energy. This design uses an elastic element to apply tensile force, which is released when hydraulic pressure is applied. This gives the muscle the unique characteristic of storing elastic energy when pressurized and releasing it to contract. Other artificial muscles, such as the McKibben, are similar to HAM in the respect that they are fluid-actuated and can be locked in place, but the McKibben is contractile in operation. Additionally, HAM utilizes incompressible fluid (water) and it is limited to expansion in only one dimension, which offers a higher energy density. It is much more compliant than traditional hydraulic cylinders, making it better suited for use in human rehabilitation and augmentation. Finally, HAM is constructed using common materials, making it an extremely low cost solution for both medical and robotic applications.

[1]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Wearable soft robotic device for post-stroke shoulder rehabilitation: Identifying misalignments , 2012, 2012 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems.

[2]  Richard M. Greenwald,et al.  Volume Management: Smart Variable Geometry Socket (SVGS) Technology for Lower-Limb Prostheses , 2003 .

[3]  W. Rymer,et al.  Robot-assisted reaching exercise promotes arm movement recovery in chronic hemiparetic stroke: a randomized controlled pilot study , 2006, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation.

[4]  V. Lenin,et al.  The United States of America , 2002, Government Statistical Agencies and the Politics of Credibility.

[5]  Robert D. Howe,et al.  Design considerations for an active soft orthotic system for shoulder rehabilitation , 2011, 2011 Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society.

[6]  Koichi Suzumori,et al.  Very High Force Hydraulic McKibben Artificial Muscle with a p-Phenylene-2,6-benzobisoxazole Cord Sleeve , 2010, Adv. Robotics.

[7]  R. A. R. C. Gopura,et al.  A brief review on upper extremity robotic exoskeleton systems , 2011, 2011 6th International Conference on Industrial and Information Systems.

[8]  N. Hogan,et al.  Overview of clinical trials with MIT-MANUS: a robot-aided neuro-rehabilitation facility. , 1999, Technology and health care : official journal of the European Society for Engineering and Medicine.

[10]  Aaron M. Dollar,et al.  Lower Extremity Exoskeletons and Active Orthoses: Challenges and State-of-the-Art , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Robotics.