A learning-based account of fluid intelligence from the perspective of the position effect

Abstract The current study addresses the question of whether performance on fluid intelligence tests involves learning processes by employing an approach emanating from research into the position effect of psychometric scales. This approach enables the modeling of learning processes that may occur while completing the items of an intelligence test. We analyzed the data of Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices (Raven's Matrices) collected from a sample of 220 participants. Fixed-links models were applied for decomposing the variances and covariances of Raven's Matrices into a position component associated with the position effect, and a constant component independent of the item positions. These two components were linked to associative and complex learning. Results indicated that the two types of learning accounted for 66% of the latent variance of Raven's Matrices. Complex learning displayed an especially strong association with the position component. It is concluded that learning processes are an important ingredient of fluid intelligence.

[1]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[2]  Tom Verguts,et al.  A Rasch Model for Detecting Learning While Solving an Intelligence Test , 2000 .

[3]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[4]  Johannes Hartig,et al.  A Confirmatory Analysis of Item Reliability Trends (CAIRT): Differentiating True Score and Error Variance in the Analysis of Item Context Effects , 2007, Multivariate behavioral research.

[5]  K. Schweizer,et al.  A revision of Cattell's investment theory: Cognitive properties influencing learning. , 2002 .

[6]  Dawn P. Flanagan,et al.  Contemporary intellectual assessment : theories, tests, and issues , 1997 .

[7]  J. Guthke,et al.  Are Learning Tests the Better Version of Intelligence Tests , 1996 .

[8]  K. Schweizer.  Scaling Variances of Latent Variables by Standardizing Loadings: Applications to Working Memory and the Position Effect , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[9]  Gerhard H. Fischer,et al.  Some Applications of Logistic Latent Trait Models with Linear Constraints on the Parameters , 1982 .

[10]  John R. Anderson,et al.  The role of examples and rules in the acquisition of a cognitive skill. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  James C. Hamilton,et al.  Self-awareness mediates the relationship between serial position and item reliability , 1990 .

[12]  R. Sternberg,et al.  Learning and individual differences: Advances in theory and research. , 1989 .

[13]  Stanley Rothman,et al.  Survey of Expert Opinion on Intelligence and Aptitude Testing. , 1987 .

[14]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1992 .

[15]  Ben A. Williams,et al.  Learning of three-term contingencies correlates with Raven scores, but not with measures of cognitive processing , 2006 .

[16]  K. Kubinger.  On the revival of the Rasch model-based LLTM: From constructing tests using item generating rules to measuring item administration effects , 2008 .

[17]  Jrm Alexander,et al.  Intelligence, learning and long-term memory , 1997 .

[18]  M A Just,et al.  From the SelectedWorks of Marcel Adam Just 1990 What one intelligence test measures : A theoretical account of the processing in the Raven Progressive Matrices Test , 2016 .

[19]  Eric S. Knowles,et al.  Reliability shifts in measurement reactivity: driven by content engagement or self-engagement? , 1996 .

[20]  J. Carroll.  Human Cognitive Abilities-a sur-vey of factor-analytic studies , 1993 .

[21]  Investigating Experimental Effects Within the Framework of Structural Equation Modeling: An Example With Effects on Both Error Scores and Reaction Times , 2008 .

[22]  R. Cattell.  Intelligence : its structure, growth and action , 1987 .

[23]  Xuezhu Ren,et al.  How Does Attention Relate to the Ability-Specific and Position-Specific Components of Reasoning Measured by APM?. , 2012 .

[24]  Gregory J. H. Colflesh,et al.  New rule use drives the relation between working memory capacity and Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[25]  S. Troche,et al.  On the special relationship between fluid and general intelligence: New evidence obtained by considering the position effect , 2011 .

[26]  B. Underwood,et al.  The interrelationships among some associative learning tasks , 1979 .

[27]  Ricardo Primi,et al.  Complexity of Geometric Inductive Reasoning Tasks: Contribution to the Understanding of Fluid Intelligence. , 2001 .

[28]  Tom Verguts,et al.  The induction of solution rules in Raven's Progressive Matrices Test , 2002 .

[29]  B. R. Buckingham.  Intelligence and its measurement: A symposium--XIV. , 1921 .

[30]  The Fixed-Links Model in Combination With the Polynomial Function as a Tool for Investigating Choice Reaction Time Data , 2006 .

[31]  Susan E. Embretson,et al.  A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change , 1991 .

[32]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Associative learning predicts intelligence above and beyond working memory and processing speed , 2009 .

[33]  T. Salthouse,et al.  Correlates of individual, and age-related, differences in short-term learning. , 2007, Learning and individual differences.

[34]  P. McCullagh,et al.  Generalized Linear Models , 1984 .

[35]  A. Jensen,et al.  The relationship between learning and intelligence , 1989 .