Effects of SME collaboration on R&D in the service sector in open innovation

Abstract This study analyses the eects of ftur types of collaborative activities on the R&D pelformance of service SMEs in the context of open innovation: in-house R&D (non-collaboration), technology acquisition, R&D collaboration, and networking. For this, the study employs data envelopment analysis, a power tool that uses multiple inputs and outputs to measure the relative efficiency of collaborative activities of service SMEsfir R&D. The results indicate that technology acquisition is the most efficient type of collaboration for R&D of service SMEs. More specifically, in-house R&D, technology acquisition, and Re9-D collaboration are positively related to product/service innovation, patenting activity, and process innovation, respectively. However, networking is not significantly related to any three types of R&D performance. In addition, the service SME1 strategicficus did not match their strategic purposes, suggesting a need fir adjusting their collaborative activities. The results have important implications for managers and policy-makers interested in facilitating open innovation in service SMEs through various collaborative activities.

[1]  Samuel B. Graves,et al.  R&D productivity: A global multi-industry comparison , 1996 .

[2]  H. Chesbrough,et al.  Beyond High Tech: Early Adopters of Open Innovation in Other Industries , 2006 .

[3]  W Kuemmerle,et al.  Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. , 1997, Harvard business review.

[4]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY: A NEW PERSPECTIVE ON LEARNING AND INNOVATION , 1990 .

[5]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[6]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology , 2003 .

[7]  Richard,et al.  Interactive innovation in financial and business services : The vanguard of the service revolution , 2001 .

[8]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  External Commercialization of Knowledge: Review and Research Agenda , 2005 .

[9]  Faïz Gallouj,et al.  Innovation in services , 1997 .

[10]  Stephane Lhuillery,et al.  R&D cooperation and failures in innovation projects: Empirical evidence from French CIS data , 2009 .

[11]  Eric H. Kessler,et al.  Internal Vs. External Learning In New Product Development: Effects On Speed, Costs And Competitive Advantage , 2000 .

[12]  篠原 正明,et al.  William W.Cooper,Lawrence M.Seiford,Kaoru Tone 著, DATA ENVELOPMENT ANALYSIS : A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 2000年, 318頁 , 2002 .

[13]  R. Narula.  R&D Collaboration by SMEs: new opportunities and limitations in the face of globalisation , 2004 .

[14]  E. Autio,et al.  Knowledge relatedness and post-spin-off growth , 2004 .

[15]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[16]  A. U.S.,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 2003 .

[17]  Eva Kirner,et al.  Innovation paths and the innovation performance of low-technology firms--An empirical analysis of German industry , 2009 .

[18]  E. Bohlin,et al.  External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations , 1992 .

[19]  Sungjoon Lee,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs—An intermediated network model , 2010 .

[20]  W. Cooper,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software , 1999 .

[21]  M. V. Valkenburg.  Network Analysis , 1964 .

[22]  Henry Chesbrough,et al.  Open Innovation: A research agenda , 2006 .

[23]  Oliver Gassmann,et al.  Organizing Pharmaceutical Innovation: From Science‐based Knowledge Creators to Drug‐oriented Knowledge Brokers , 2005 .

[24]  B. Tether.  Who co-operates for innovation, and why: An empirical analysis , 2002 .

[25]  Laurens Cherchye,et al.  An Introduction to ‘Benefit of the Doubt’ Composite Indicators , 2007 .

[26]  M. Dodgson,et al.  The Role of Technology in the Shift Towards Open Innovation: The Case of Procter & Gamble , 2006 .

[27]  A. Charnes,et al.  Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis , 1984 .

[28]  Ulrich Lichtenthaler,et al.  Open Innovation in Practice: An Analysis of Strategic Approaches to Technology Transactions , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[29]  Jiann-Chyuan Wang,et al.  External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study , 2008 .

[30]  Alfred Kleinknecht,et al.  Why do firms cooperate on R&D? an empirical study , 1992 .

[31]  A. Arora,et al.  Markets for Technology: The Economics of Innovation and Corporate Strategy , 2004 .

[32]  Michael E. Raynor,et al.  The Innovator's Solution: Creating and Sustaining Successful Growth , 2003 .

[33]  David Kline,et al.  Sharing the Corporate Crown Jewels , 2003 .

[34]  Arthur J. Keown,et al.  Do strategic alliances create value , 1997 .

[35]  Rachelle C. Sampson.  R&D Alliances & Firm Performance: The Impact of Technological Diversity and Alliance Organization on Innovation , 2003 .

[36]  Boo-Young Eom,et al.  Determinants of industry–academy linkages and, their impact on firm performance: The case of Korea as a latecomer in knowledge industrialization☆ , 2010 .

[37]  Michael Fritsch,et al.  Who cooperates on R&D? , 2001 .

[38]  Frederic M. Scherer,et al.  The propensity to patent , 1983 .

[39]  L. Klomp,et al.  Linking Innovation and Firm Performance: A New Approach , 2001 .

[40]  R. Karl Rethemeyer,et al.  Network analysis , 2011 .

[41]  Rick Delbridge,et al.  Understanding innovation in small and medium-sized enterprises: a process manifest , 2005 .

[42]  D. Gann,et al.  How open is innovation , 2010 .

[43]  Jong de Jpj,et al.  Open innovation in SMEs : trends, motives and management challenges , 2009 .

[44]  James M. Utterback,et al.  A dynamic model of process and product innovation , 1975 .

[45]  Peter J. Lane,et al.  Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning , 1998 .

[46]  Cheng-Wen Lee,et al.  Strategic alliances influence on small and medium firm performance , 2007 .

[47]  A. Zhang,et al.  A study of the R&D efficiency and productivity of Chinese firms , 2003 .

[48]  M. Carree,et al.  Cooperative R&D and Firm Performance , 2004 .

[49]  R. Barras.  Towards a theory of innovation in services , 1986 .

[50]  Melissa A. Schilling.  Strategic Management of Technological Innovation , 2004 .

[51]  H. Grupp,et al.  Innovation in the service sector: The demand for service-specific innovation measurement concepts and typologies , 2005 .

[52]  H. Ernst,et al.  External Technology Commercialization in Large Firms: Results of a Quantitative Benchmarking Study , 2007 .

[53]  Réjean Landry,et al.  Sources of information as determinants of novelty of innovation in manufacturing firms: evidence from the 1999 statistics Canada innovation survey , 2005 .

[54]  Geert Duysters,et al.  Technological capability building through networking strategies within high-tech industries , 2002 .

[55]  Yannis Caloghirou,et al.  Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance? , 2004 .

[56]  G. Ahuja.  Collaboration Networks, Structural Holes, and Innovation: A Longitudinal Study , 1998 .

[57]  Hakyeon Lee,et al.  Comparative evaluation of performance of national R&D programs with heterogeneous objectives: A DEA approach , 2009, Eur. J. Oper. Res..