Myocardial perfusion reserve compared with peripheral perfusion reserve: A [13N]ammonia PET study

Introduction[13N]ammonia PET allows quantification of myocardial perfusion. The similarity between peripheral flow and myocardial perfusion is unclear. We compared perfusion flow in the myocardium with the upper limb during rest and adenosine stress [13N]ammonia PET to establish whether peripheral perfusion reserve (PPR) correlates with MPR.Methods[13N]ammonia myocardial perfusion PET-scans of 58 patients were evaluated (27 men, 31 women, age 64 ± 13 years) and were divided in four subgroups: patients with coronary artery disease (CAD, n = 15), cardiac syndrome X (SX, n = 14), idiopathic dilating cardiomyopathy (DCM, n = 16), and normal controls (NC, n = 13). Peripheral limb perfusion was measured in the muscular tissue of the proximal upper limb and quantified through a 2-tissue-compartment model and the PPR was calculated (stress/rest ratio). MPR was also calculated by a 2-tissue-compartment model. The PPR results were compared with the MPR findings.ResultsMean myocardial perfusion increased significantly in all groups as evidenced by the MPR (CAD 1.99 ± 0.47; SX 1.39 ± 0.31; DCM 1.72 ± 0.69; NC 2.91 ± 0.78). Mean peripheral perfusion also increased but not significantly and accompanied with great variations within and between groups (mean PPR: CAD 1.30 ± 0.79; SX 1.36 ± 0.71; DCM 1.60 ± 1.22; NC 1.27 ± 0.63). The mean difference between PPR and MPR for all subpopulations varied widely. No significant correlations in flow reserve were found between peripheral and myocardial microcirculatory beds in any of the groups (Total group: r = −0.07, SEE = 0.70, CAD: r = 0.14, SEE = 0.48, SX: r = 0.17, SEE = 0.30, DCM: r = −0.11, SEE = 0.71, NC: r = −0.19, SEE = 0.80).ConclusionNo correlations between myocardial and peripheral perfusion (reserve) were found in different patient populations in the same PET session. This suggests a functional difference between peripheral and myocardial flow in the response to intravenously administered adenosine stress.

[1]  D E Kuhl,et al.  Noninvasive quantification of regional blood flow in the human heart using N-13 ammonia and dynamic positron emission tomographic imaging. , 1990, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[2]  N. Buus,et al.  Peripheral Flow Response to Transient Arterial Forearm Occlusion Does Not Reflect Myocardial Perfusion Reserve , 2001, Circulation.

[3]  A. Yeung,et al.  Close relation of endothelial function in the human coronary and peripheral circulations. , 1995, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[4]  W. Rand,et al.  Peripheral vascular endothelial function testing as a noninvasive indicator of coronary artery disease. , 2001, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  H. Schelbert,et al.  Role of PET in the evaluation and understanding of coronary physiology , 2007, Journal of nuclear cardiology : official publication of the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology.

[6]  T. J. Killian,et al.  Adenosine Increases Sympathetic Nerve Traffic in Humans , 1991, Circulation.

[7]  J. Pruim,et al.  Quantitative myocardial mapping of perfusion and metabolism using parametric polar map displays in cardiac PET. , 1995, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[8]  J. Viikari,et al.  Coronary flow reserve is impaired in young men with familial hypercholesterolemia. , 1996, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  Hans L Hillege,et al.  Comparison Between the Prognostic Value of Left Ventricular Function and Myocardial Perfusion Reserve in Patients with Ischemic Heart Disease , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[10]  A. Szent-Györgyi,et al.  The physiological activity of adenine compounds with especial reference to their action upon the mammalian heart 1 , 1929, The Journal of physiology.

[11]  Y. Hellsten,et al.  Comparison of exogenous adenosine and voluntary exercise on human skeletal muscle perfusion and perfusion heterogeneity. , 2010, Journal of applied physiology.

[12]  M. Phelps,et al.  Effect of beta 1 adrenergic receptor blockade on myocardial blood flow and vasodilatory capacity. , 1997, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[13]  C. Cobelli,et al.  Muscle blood flow and flow heterogeneity during exercise studied with positron emission tomography in humans , 2000, European Journal of Applied Physiology.

[14]  D. Neglia,et al.  Myocardial and forearm blood flow reserve in mild‐moderate essential hypertensive patients , 1997, Journal of hypertension.

[15]  D. J. Veldhuisen,et al.  Reduced regional myocardial perfusion reserve is associated with impaired contractile performance in idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy , 2009, Netherlands heart journal : monthly journal of the Netherlands Society of Cardiology and the Netherlands Heart Foundation.

[16]  M. Phelps,et al.  Influence of Age and Hemodynamics on Myocardial Blood Flow and Flow Reserve , 1993, Circulation.

[17]  I. Biaggioni Clinical and Molecular Pharmacologic Characteristics of Adenosine‐induced Vasodilation , 2004, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[18]  H. Crijns,et al.  Regional myocardial blood flow reserve impairment and metabolic changes suggesting myocardial ischemia in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  M. Phelps,et al.  Reproducibility of measurements of regional resting and hyperemic myocardial blood flow assessed with PET. , 1996, Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine.

[20]  K. Togashi,et al.  Comparison of myocardial blood flow induced by adenosine triphosphate and dipyridamole in patients with coronary artery disease , 2005, Annals of nuclear medicine.