Review and performance of four models to assess the fate of radionuclides and heavy metals in surface soil

The nuclear industry uses computer models to calculate and assess the impact of its present and future releases to the environment, both from operating reactors and from existing licensed and planned waste management facilities. We review four soil models varying in complexity that could be useful for environmental impact assessment. The goal of this comparison is to direct the combined use of these models in order to preserve simplicity, yet increase the rigor of Canadian environmental assessment calculations involving soil transport pathways. The four models chosen are: the Soil Chemical Exchange and Migration of Radionuclides (SCEMR1) model; the Baes and Sharp/Preclosure PREAC soil model, both used in Canada's nuclear fuel waste management program; the Convection-Dispersion Equation (CDE) model, commonly used in contaminant transport applications; and the Canadian Standards Association (CSA) derived release limit model used for normal operations at nuclear facilities. We discuss how each model operates...

[1]  Joerg Richter.  The Soil as a Reactor: Modelling Processes in the Soil , 1987 .

[2]  D. Elrick,et al.  An analysis of solute accumulation during steady-state evaporation in an initially contaminated soil , 1994 .

[3]  F. Owen Hoffman,et al.  A Statistical Analysis Of Selected Parameters For Predicting Food Chain Transport And Internal Dose Of Radionuclides , 1979 .

[4]  J. B. Mankin,et al.  Documentation of PROSPER: a model of atmosphere-soil-plant water flow , 1974 .

[5]  R. D. Sharp,et al.  A proposal for estimation of soil leaching and leaching constants for use in assessment models , 1983 .

[6]  P. A. Smith,et al.  Factors affecting the soil sorption of iodine , 1995 .

[7]  Daniel Hillel,et al.  Applications of soil physics , 1980 .

[8]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  Chemical behaviour of iodine in organic and mineral soils , 1992 .

[9]  Gillham Rw,et al.  Cesium distribution of coefficients in unconsolidated geological materials. , 1980 .

[10]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  Effects of model complexity on uncertainty estimates , 1998 .

[11]  William A. Jury,et al.  Simulation of solute transport using a transfer function model , 1982 .

[12]  Todd H. Skaggs,et al.  Solute transport in unsaturated soil: Experimental design, parameter estimation and model discrimination , 1996 .

[13]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  Default soil solid/liquid partition coefficients, Kds, for four major soil types: a compendium. , 1990, Health physics.

[14]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  A linear sorption/dynamic water flow model applied to the results of a four-year soil core study , 1991 .

[15]  R. White,et al.  A simple analytical transfer function approach to modelling the leaching of reactive solutes through field soil , 1996 .

[16]  P. A. Smith,et al.  Iodine dispersion and effects on groundwater chemistry following a release to a peat bog, Manitoba, Canada , 1989 .

[17]  P. Coughtrey,et al.  Radionuclide distribution and transport in terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems : a compendium of data , 1983 .

[18]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  Performance of a soil model in predicting consequences of smelter emissions, including abatement scenarios , 1993 .

[19]  C. Vandecasteele,et al.  A sensitivity study of the SCK.CEN BIOSPHERE model for performance assessment of near-surface repositories. , 1995, Health physics.

[20]  M. I. Sheppard,et al.  Predicting soil lead migration: how can ancient church roofs help? , 1995 .