Modelling students' flow experiences in an online learning environment

This paper aims to clarify and characterize the role of flow in student's behavioural processes in virtual learning environments. To this end, an integral model of flow in e-learning environments is proposed and tested. The empirical part of the research was based on both qualitative and quantitative techniques. The former consisted of seven in-depth interviews carried out with experts in e-learning environments and two different groups. The latter consisted of an online survey resulting in a sample of 2574 valid questionnaires. The theoretical model was tested and validated using the standard methodological procedure based on exploratory and confirmatory analyses. The results indicate that time distortions and focused attention are the most important direct antecedents of flow. The challenges posed by the environment were revealed as the main indirect conditioner of the experience, but other factors, such as personalization (a new variable not considered in previous flow studies in the e-learning context), were also found to be significant. In short, this papers sheds light on the processes of online browsing and, thus, on a more suitable design for an e-learning environment. Furthermore, two direct positive consequences of the flow experience are proved: positive affect (such as feeling happy, satisfied and cheerful) and student learning. In sum, it can be concluded that institutions are better off providing students with e-learning environments conducive to getting them into a flow state.

[1]  Elena Karahanna,et al.  Time Flies When You're Having Fun: Cognitive Absorption and Beliefs About Information Technology Usage , 2000, MIS Q..

[2]  Marios Koufaris,et al.  Applying the Technology Acceptance Model and Flow Theory to Online Consumer Behavior , 2002, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Rolf T. Wigand,et al.  Exploring Web users' optimal flow experiences , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[4]  Kyu Yon Lim,et al.  A Model for Predicting Learning Flow and Achievement in Corporate e-Learning , 2012, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[5]  Namin Shin,et al.  Online learner's 'flow' experience: an empirical study , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[6]  Hsiu-Li Liao,et al.  Impact of media richness and flow on e-learning technology acceptance , 2009, Comput. Educ..

[7]  F. Martínez-López,et al.  Structural equation modelling in marketing and business research , 2013 .

[8]  J. Ghani Flow in human-computer interactions: test of a model , 1995 .

[9]  Xinran Lehto,et al.  E-PERSONALIZATION AND ONLINE PRIVACY FEATURES: THE CASE WITH TRAVEL WEBSITES , 2009 .

[10]  Kursat Cagiltay,et al.  Flow experiences of children in an interactive social game environment , 2007, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[11]  Jon M. Pearce,et al.  Engaging the Learner: How Can the Flow Experience Support E-learning? , 2005 .

[12]  Zhen Liu,et al.  Research on personalization E-learning system based on agent technology , 2009 .

[13]  Manuel Jesús,et al.  El comportamiento del usuario en la web: un análisis del estado de flujo , 2005 .

[14]  Hsin Hsin Chang,et al.  An investigation of user communication behavior in computer mediated environments , 2008, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[16]  Manuel J. Sánchez-Franco El comportamiento del usuario en la web: un análisis del estado de flujo , 2005 .

[17]  A. D. Fave,et al.  Optimal experience: Modernization and the changing contexts of flow in work and leisure , 1988 .

[18]  F. Martínez-López,et al.  The Concept of Flow in Online Consumer Behavior , 2014 .

[19]  Hyojung Jung,et al.  Development of motivational E-Learning Environment Based on Flow Theory , 2008 .

[20]  G. Cowan Statistical data analysis , 1998 .

[21]  Zoran Budimac,et al.  E-Learning personalization based on hybrid recommendation strategy and learning style identification , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Steven Pace,et al.  Play and flow: Implications for online learning , 2007 .

[23]  Thierry Volery,et al.  Critical success factors in online education , 2000 .

[24]  Jan-Benedict E. M. Steenkamp,et al.  The use of LISREL in validating marketing constructs. , 1991 .

[25]  G. Kennedy,et al.  The elusive experience of ‘flow’: Qualitative and quantitative indicators , 2008 .

[26]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience , 1990 .

[27]  Adem Karahoca,et al.  Computer assisted active learning system development for critical thinking and flow , 2008, CompSysTech.

[28]  J. Webster,et al.  The Dimensionality and Correlates of Flow in Human-Computer Interactions. , 1993 .

[29]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Beyond boredom and anxiety , 1975 .

[30]  Lourdes Guàrdia Ortiz,et al.  PERSONALIZACIÓN DEL PROCESO DE APRENDIZAJE USANDO LEARNING OBJECTS REUTILIZABLES , 2005 .

[31]  Ming-Hui Huang,et al.  Designing website attributes to induce experiential encounters , 2003, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[32]  Clive J. Fullagar,et al.  Facilitators and Outcomes of Student Engagement in a College Setting , 2009, The Journal of psychology.

[33]  Sheng-Chin Yu,et al.  journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/compedu , 2022 .

[34]  Donna L. Hoffman,et al.  Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach , 2000 .

[35]  Mu-Chen Chen,et al.  Flow Experience and Internet Shopping Behavior: Investigating the Moderating Effect of Consumer Characteristics , 2012 .

[36]  M. Csíkszentmihályi Flow. The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York (HarperPerennial) 1990. , 1990 .

[37]  K. Kiili Digital game-based learning: Towards an experiential gaming model , 2005, Internet High. Educ..

[38]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[39]  Dennis L. Hoffman,et al.  Marketing in Hypermedia Computer-Mediated Environments : Conceptual Foundations 1 ) , 1998 .

[40]  David Hinkley,et al.  Bootstrap Methods: Another Look at the Jackknife , 2008 .

[41]  Soung Hie Kim,et al.  ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective , 2007, Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud..

[42]  Yi-Shun Wang,et al.  Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems , 2003, Inf. Manag..

[43]  Barbara D. Klein,et al.  The Effects of Flow on Learning Outcomes in an Online Information Management Course , 2009, J. Inf. Syst. Educ..

[44]  M. Richard,et al.  A model of consumer web navigational behavior: conceptual development and application , 2005 .

[45]  Steve Howard,et al.  The ebb and flow of online learning , 2005, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  R. Bagozzi,et al.  Trying to Consume , 1990 .

[47]  Richard G. Netemeyer,et al.  Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications , 2003 .

[48]  Yongxia Skadberg,et al.  Visitors' flow experience while browsing a Web site: its measurement, contributing factors and consequences , 2004, Comput. Hum. Behav..