The segment identity functions of Ultrabithorax are contained within its homeo domain and carboxy-terminal sequences.

Using an in vivo assay for segment identity, the structural differences that distinguish two Drosophila homeotic selector proteins, Ultrabithorax (Ubx) and Antennapedia (Antp), have been investigated. There are at least two independent parts of Ubx and Antp that contribute to their functional specificities: (1) their homeo domains and (2) residues carboxy-terminal to their homeo domains (C-tails). In the absence of any C-tail, differences in 5 homeo domain amino acids are sufficient to distinguish between the functions of Ubx and Antp. Two of these are at the amino terminus of the homeo domain and could contact DNA directly. A three dimensional model suggests that the other 3 homeo domain residues and the C-tails are unlikely to contact DNA. In addition, we demonstrate that the assay used to measure the segment identity functions of Ubx and Antp is independent of any homeotic selector gene normally active in thoracic and abdominal segments. Therefore, it is likely that this assay measures the coordinate regulation of many downstream target genes. This expectation is confirmed for at least one Ubx target gene, Distal-less.

[1]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[2]  Kurt Wüthrich,et al.  Determination of the Three-dimensional Structure of the Antennapedia Homeodomain from Drosophila in Solution by 1H Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy , 1993 .

[3]  S. Ekker,et al.  Differential DNA sequence recognition is a determinant of specificity in homeotic gene action. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[4]  P. Sharp,et al.  Recognition of the surface of a homeo domain protein. , 1992, Genes & development.

[5]  Juan Botas,et al.  Homeotic genes of the bithorax complex repress limb development in the abdomen of the Drosophila embryo through the target gene Distal-less , 1992, Cell.

[6]  D. Grueneberg,et al.  Human and Drosophila Homeodomain Proteins That Enhance the DNA-Binding Activity of Serum Response Factor , 1992, Science.

[7]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Mapping functional specificity in the Dfd and Ubx homeo domains. , 1992, Genes & development.

[8]  Y. Suzuki,et al.  Molecular analysis of the deletion mutants in the E homeotic complex of the silkworm Bombyx mori. , 1992, Development.

[9]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Antp‐type homeodomains have distinct DNA binding specificities that correlate with their different regulatory functions in embryos. , 1992, The EMBO journal.

[10]  E. Turner,et al.  Twin of I-POU: A two amino acid difference in the I-POU homeodomain distinguishes an activator from an inhibitor of transcription , 1992, Cell.

[11]  Dana L. Smith,et al.  A molecular mechanism for combinatorial control in yeast: MCM1 protein sets the spacing and orientation of the homeodomains of an α2 dimer , 1992, Cell.

[12]  Cynthia Wolberger,et al.  Crystal structure of a MAT alpha 2 homeodomain-operator complex suggests a general model for homeodomain-DNA interactions. , 1991, Cell.

[13]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[14]  D. Hogness,et al.  Phosphorylation, expression and function of the Ultrabithorax protein family in Drosophila melanogaster. , 1991, Development.

[15]  S. Ekker,et al.  Optimal DNA sequence recognition by the Ultrabithorax homeodomain of Drosophila. , 1991, The EMBO journal.

[16]  M. Rosenfeld,et al.  I-POU: a POU-domain protein that inhibits neuron-specific gene activation , 1991, Nature.

[17]  M. Scott,et al.  What determines the specificity of action of Drosophila homeodomain proteins? , 1990, Cell.

[18]  Carl O. Pabo,et al.  Crystal structure of an engrailed homeodomain-DNA complex at 2.8 Å resolution: A framework for understanding homeodomain-DNA interactions , 1990, Cell.

[19]  K Wüthrich,et al.  Protein–DNA contacts in the structure of a homeodomain–DNA complex determined by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy in solution. , 1990, The EMBO journal.

[20]  A. Schier,et al.  The specificities of sex combs reduced and Antennapedia are defined by a distinct portion of each protein that includes the homeodomain , 1990, Cell.

[21]  F. Karch,et al.  abdA expression in Drosophila embryos. , 1990, Genes & development.

[22]  W. Gehring,et al.  DNA binding properties of the purified Antennapedia homeodomain. , 1990, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G. Morata,et al.  The developmental effect of overexpressing a Ubx product in Drosophila embryos is dependent on its interactions with other homeotic products , 1990, Cell.

[24]  R. Mann,et al.  Functional dissection of ultrabithorax proteins in D. melanogaster , 1990, Cell.

[25]  P. Sharp,et al.  The octamer‐binding proteins form multi‐protein‐‐DNA complexes with the HSV alpha TIF regulatory protein. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[26]  Pierre Gönczy,et al.  A single amino acid can determine the DNA binding specificity of homeodomain proteins , 1989, Cell.

[27]  W. McGinnis,et al.  A homeodomain substitution changes the regulatory specificity of the Deformed protein in drosophila embryos , 1989, Cell.

[28]  Alexander D. Johnson,et al.  Yeast repressor alpha 2 binds to its operator cooperatively with yeast protein Mcm1 , 1989, Molecular and cellular biology.

[29]  M. Levine,et al.  Characterization of a homologue of bithorax-complex genes in the leech Hirudo medicinalis , 1989, Nature.

[30]  W. Herr,et al.  The Oct-1 homoeodomain directs formation of a multiprotein-DNA complex with the HSV transactivator VP16 , 1989, Nature.

[31]  M. Scott,et al.  The structure and function of the homeodomain. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[32]  Roger Brent,et al.  DNA specificity of the bicoid activator protein is determined by homeodomain recognition helix residue 9 , 1989, Cell.

[33]  H. Jäckle,et al.  Distal-less encodes a homoeodomain protein required for limb development in Drosophila , 1989, Nature.

[34]  M. Delorenzi,et al.  Drosophila homoeotic genes encode transcriptional activators similar to mammalian OTF-2 , 1988, Nature.

[35]  K. Wüthrich,et al.  Isolation and sequence‐specific DNA binding of the Antennapedia homeodomain. , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[36]  H. Mihara,et al.  A chemically synthesized Antennapedia homeo domain binds to a specific DNA sequence , 1988, Science.

[37]  W. McGinnis,et al.  Autoregulation of a drosophila homeotic selector gene , 1988, Cell.

[38]  P. O’Farrell,et al.  The sequence specificity of homeodomain-DNA interaction , 1988, Cell.

[39]  C. Keleher,et al.  The yeast cell-type-specific repressor α2 acts cooperatively with a non-cell-type-specific protein , 1988, Cell.

[40]  M. Levine,et al.  Divergent homeo box proteins recognize similar DNA sequences in Drosophila , 1988, Nature.

[41]  G. Gibson,et al.  Head and thoracic transformations caused by ectopic expression of Antennapedia during Drosophila development , 1988 .

[42]  E. Sánchez-Herrero,et al.  Developmental analysis of a hybrid gene composed of parts of the Ubx and abd‐A genes of Drosophila , 1988, EMBO Journal.

[43]  M. Akam,et al.  The structure and expression of a hybrid homeotic gene , 1988, The EMBO journal.

[44]  E. Sánchez-Herrero,et al.  Double and triple mutant combinations of bithorax complex of Drosophila. , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[45]  W. Gehring,et al.  Homeo boxes in the study of development. , 1987, Science.

[46]  W. Gehring,et al.  Molecular analysis of the dominant homeotic Antennapedia phenotype , 1987, The EMBO journal.

[47]  Robert A. H. White,et al.  Contrabithorax mutations cause inappropriate expression of Ultrabithorax products in Drosophila , 1985, Nature.

[48]  R. Denell,et al.  Homoeosis in Drosophila: Roles and spatial patterns of expression of the Antennapedia and Sex combs reduced loci in embryogenesis , 1985 .

[49]  M. Wilcox,et al.  Distribution of Ultrabithorax proteins in Drosophila , 1985, The EMBO journal.

[50]  A. Laughon,et al.  Sequence of a Drosophila segmentation gene: protein structure homology with DNA-binding proteins , 1984, Nature.

[51]  G. Struhl.  Role of the esc+ gene product in ensuring the selective expression of segment-specific homeotic genes in Drosophila. , 1983, Journal of embryology and experimental morphology.

[52]  G. Struhl.  Genes controlling segmental specification in the Drosophila thorax. , 1982, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[53]  A. Garcı́a-Bellido.  Homoeotic and atavic mutations in insects , 1977 .

[54]  E. Lewis.  Genes and Developmental Pathways , 1963 .

[55]  R. Mann,et al.  Negative autoregulation by Ultrabithorax controls the level and pattern of its expression. , 1993, Development.

[56]  A. Johnson.  37 A Combinatorial Regulatory Circuit in Budding Yeast , 1992 .

[57]  A. Simeone,et al.  Human HOX homeobox genes. , 1991, Oxford surveys on eukaryotic genes.

[58]  G. Morata,et al.  Organization of the Drosophila head as revealed by the ectopic expression of the Ultrabithorax product. , 1991, Development.

[59]  G. Olsen,et al.  Molecular and genetic organization of the antennapedia gene complex of Drosophila melanogaster. , 1990, Advances in genetics.

[60]  K. G. Coleman,et al.  Expression of engrailed proteins in arthropods, annelids, and chordates. , 1989, Cell.

[61]  V. Pirrotta.  Vectors for P-mediated transformation in Drosophila. , 1988, Biotechnology.

[62]  W. Gehring,et al.  Redesigning the body plan of Drosophilaby ectopic expression of the homoeotic gene Antennapedia , 1987, Nature.

[63]  E. Lewis,et al.  Control of body segment differentiation in Drosophila by the bithorax gene complex. , 1982, Progress in clinical and biological research.