Approaching the Loop: A Brief Review of Effective Practises in Continuous Program Improvement

Using the results of outcomes based assessment for the purposes of continuous improvement, or closing the loop, is a frequent topic of discussion in higher education, and is becoming more commonplace amongst Canadian engineering programs. There have been several organizations and institutions in the United States that have been investigating outcomes assessment and how institutions use the data for improvement purposes. Most notable of these are the National Institute for Learning Outcomes Assessment and the schools participating the in the Wabash Study. Despite these investigations and discussions, there is no clear consensus of what a functioning closed loop resembles, due to the diversity that exists between one institution and the next. Ultimately it will be the decision of an individual institution as to what the final process will resemble, but there are some key or effective practises for continuous improvement that can help institutions guide and shape their approach to closing the loop. This paper will briefly review the current landscape in continuous improvement in higher education, and present effective practises, common themes and techniques for closing the loop. The intent of this paper is to provide a resource collection of effective practises to help develop a meaningful, sustainable and practical data-informed continuous improvement process with a focus on engineering.

[1]  Catherine E. Brawner,et al.  Closing The Loop: Using Qualitative Assessment In The Continuous Quality Improvement Of The Succeed Coalition , 1999 .

[2]  Robert V. Hogg,et al.  Continuous quality improvement in higher education , 1995 .

[3]  Susan McCahan,et al.  Engineering Graduate Attribute Development (EGAD) Project , 2011 .

[4]  Douglas H. Smith,et al.  Total Quality in Higher Education. Total Quality Series. , 1994 .

[5]  Jennifer Field Brown,et al.  CONTINUOUS QUALITY IMPROVEMENT: An Effective Strategy for Improvement of Program Outcomes IN A HIGHER EDUCATION SETTING , 2008, Nursing education perspectives.

[6]  V. Carroll,et al.  Academic Quality Improvement Program: Using Quality Improvement as Tool for the Accreditation of Nursing Education , 2006, Quality management in health care.

[7]  Trudy W. Banta,et al.  Closing the Assessment Loop , 2010 .

[8]  Chee W. Chow,et al.  The Balanced Scorecard: A Potential Tool for Supporting Change and Continuous Improvement in Accounting Education , 1999 .

[9]  Natasha A. Jankowski,et al.  Using Assessment Results: Promising Practices of Institutions That Do It Well. , 2012 .

[10]  Deborah M. Thalner.  The Practice of Continuous Improvement in Higher Education , 2005 .

[11]  T. Banta.  Can Assessment for Accountability Complement Assessment for Improvement , 2007 .

[12]  Closing the Assessment Loop by Design , 2011 .

[13]  Jeroen Huisman,et al.  Accountability in higher education: Bridge over troubled water? , 2004 .

[14]  Catherine M. Millett,et al.  A Culture of Evidence: Postsecondary Assessment and Learning Outcomes. Recommendations to Policymakers and the Higher Education Community. , 2006 .

[15]  Richard J. Shavelson,et al.  Assessing Student Learning Responsibly: From History to an Audacious Proposal , 2007 .

[16]  Nadia Bhuiyan,et al.  An overview of continuous improvement: from the past to the present , 2005 .

[17]  P. Ewell.  Assessment and accountability in America today: Background and context , 2008 .

[18]  Maneesh Kumar,et al.  Lean Six Sigma for higher education institutions (HEIs): Challenges, barriers, success factors, tools/techniques , 2012 .

[19]  W. Lee Hansen,et al.  Bringing Total Quality Improvement into the college classroom , 1993 .