Identifying the inertial cavitation threshold and skull effects in a vessel phantom using focused ultrasound and microbubbles.

Focused ultrasound (FUS) in combination with microbubbles has been shown capable of delivering large molecules to the brain parenchyma through opening of the blood-brain barrier (BBB). However, the mechanism behind the opening remains unknown. To investigate the pressure threshold for inertial cavitation of preformed microbubbles during sonication, passive cavitation detection in conjunction with B-mode imaging was used. A cerebral vessel was simulated by generating a cylindrical hole of 610 microm in diameter inside a polyacrylamide gel and saturating its volume with microbubbles. Definity microbubbles (Mean diameter range: 1.1-3.3 microm, Lantheus Medical Imaging, N. Billerica, MA, USA) were injected prior to sonication (frequency: 1.525 MHz; pulse length: 100 cycles; PRF: 10 Hz; sonication duration: 2 s) through an excised mouse skull. The acoustic emissions due to the cavitation response were passively detected using a cylindrically focused hydrophone, confocal with the FUS transducer and a linear-array transducer with the field of view perpendicular to the FUS beam. The broadband spectral response acquired at the passive cavitation detector (PCD) and the B-mode images identified the occurrence and location of the inertial cavitation, respectively. Findings indicated that the peak-rarefactional pressure threshold was approximately equal to 0.45 MPa, with or without the skull present. Mouse skulls did not affect the threshold of inertial cavitation but resulted in a lower inertial cavitation dose. The broadband response could be captured through the murine skull, so the same PCD set-up can be used in future in vivo applications.

[1]  S A Small,et al.  Spatio-temporal analysis of molecular delivery through the blood–brain barrier using focused ultrasound , 2007, Physics in medicine and biology.

[2]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Microbubble-Size Dependence of Focused Ultrasound-Induced Blood–Brain Barrier Opening in Mice In Vivo , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[3]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  MRI-guided targeted blood-brain barrier disruption with focused ultrasound: histological findings in rabbits. , 2005, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[4]  R. Apfel,et al.  Gauging the likelihood of cavitation from short-pulse, low-duty cycle diagnostic ultrasound. , 1991, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[5]  Ronald A. Roy,et al.  Temporal and spatial detection of HIFU-induced inertial and hot-vapor cavitation with a diagnostic ultrasound system. , 2009, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[6]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study. , 2007, Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.

[7]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Ultrasound-mediated cavitation thresholds of liquid perfluorocarbon droplets in vitro. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[8]  S. L. Bridal,et al.  Ultrasonic contrast agent shell rupture detected by inertial cavitation and rebound signals , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[9]  P. Dayton,et al.  Mechanisms of contrast agent destruction , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[10]  Nico de Jong,et al.  Micromanipulation of endothelial cells: ultrasound-microbubble-cell interaction. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[11]  A. Brayman,et al.  A comparison of the fragmentation thresholds and inertial cavitation doses of different ultrasound contrast agents. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  A review of in vitro bioeffects of inertial ultrasonic cavitation from a mechanistic perspective. , 1996, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[13]  Morton W. Miller,et al.  The pulse length-dependence of inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[14]  Yoichiro Matsumoto,et al.  Polyacrylamide gel containing egg white as new model for irradiation experiments using focused ultrasound. , 2004, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[15]  G. Haar The Acoustic Bubble , 1996 .

[16]  P. Dayton,et al.  Threshold of fragmentation for ultrasonic contrast agents. , 2001, Journal of biomedical optics.

[17]  Lawrence A Crum,et al.  Inertial cavitation dose and hemolysis produced in vitro with or without Optison. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[18]  Kullervo Hynynen,et al.  Cavitation threshold of microbubbles in gel tunnels by focused ultrasound. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[19]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Noninvasive MR imaging-guided focal opening of the blood-brain barrier in rabbits. , 2001, Radiology.

[20]  James J. Choi,et al.  Noninvasive, transcranial and localized opening of the blood-brain barrier using focused ultrasound in mice. , 2007, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[21]  Ferenc A. Jolesz,et al.  Local and reversible blood–brain barrier disruption by noninvasive focused ultrasound at frequencies suitable for trans-skull sonications , 2005, NeuroImage.

[22]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Targeted disruption of the blood–brain barrier with focused ultrasound: association with cavitation activity , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  On the impact of vessel size on the threshold of bubble collapse , 2006 .

[24]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Blood-brain barrier disruption induced by focused ultrasound and circulating preformed microbubbles appears to be characterized by the mechanical index. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[25]  P. Vajkoczy,et al.  Increased vessel diameter of leptomeningeal anastomoses after hypoxic preconditioning , 2006, Brain Research.

[26]  Natalia Vykhodtseva,et al.  Focal disruption of the blood-brain barrier due to 260-kHz ultrasound bursts: a method for molecular imaging and targeted drug delivery. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery.

[27]  K. Hynynen,et al.  Effects of acoustic parameters and ultrasound contrast agent dose on focused-ultrasound induced blood-brain barrier disruption. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[28]  Yao-Sheng Tung,et al.  Molecules of various pharmacologically-relevant sizes can cross the ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening in vivo. , 2010, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[29]  R. Powell,et al.  Needle size and injection rate impact microbubble contrast agent population. , 2008, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[30]  Katherine W Ferrara,et al.  Acoustic response of compliable microvessels containing ultrasound contrast agents , 2006, Physics in medicine and biology.