Do all kids look alike? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults.

The current study provides evidence for the existence of an other-age effect (OAE), analogous to the well-documented other-race effect. Experiments 1 and 2 demonstrate that adults are better at recognizing adult faces compared with faces of newborns and children. Results from Experiment 3 indicate that the OAE obtained with child faces can be modulated by experience. Moreover, in each of the 3 experiments, differences in the magnitude of the observed face inversion effect for each age class of faces were taken to reflect a difference in the processing strategies used to recognize the faces of each age. Evidence from Experiment 3 indicates that these strategies can be tuned by experience. The data are discussed with reference to an experience-based framework for face recognition.

[1]  S. L. Sporer,et al.  Recognizing faces of other ethnic groups: An integration of theories. , 2001 .

[2]  Daniel B Wright,et al.  Age Differences in Lineup Identification Accuracy: People Are Better with Their Own Age , 2002, Law and human behavior.

[3]  S. de Schonen,et al.  Effect of visual experience on face processing: a developmental study of inversion and non-native effects. , 2004, Developmental science.

[4]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  Evidence for an Own-Age Bias in Face Recognition. , 2006 .

[5]  Gillian Rhodes,et al.  Expert face coding: Configural and component coding of own-race and other-race faces , 2006, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[6]  J. Brigham,et al.  Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review , 2001 .

[7]  Matthew G. Rhodes,et al.  An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  Face perception: domain specific, not process specific. , 2004, Neuron.

[9]  George L. Malcolm,et al.  Regional Variation in the Inversion Effect for Faces: Differential Effects for Feature Shape, Feature Configuration, and External Contour , 2004, Perception.

[10]  C. Pallier,et al.  Reversibility of the Other-Race Effect in Face Recognition During Childhood , 2005, Psychological science.

[11]  Steve Stewart-Williams,et al.  Face recognition and aging: Effects of target age and memory load , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[12]  B. Fredrickson,et al.  “We All Look the Same to Me” , 2005, Psychological science.

[13]  D. Maurer,et al.  The many faces of configural processing , 2002, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  D. Maurer,et al.  Configural Face Processing Develops more Slowly than Featural Face Processing , 2002, Perception.

[15]  M. Riesenhuber,et al.  Face processing in humans is compatible with a simple shape–based model of vision , 2004, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[16]  T. Valentine,et al.  An Investigation of the Contact Hypothesis of the Own-race Bias in Face Recognition , 1995 .

[17]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Holistic Processing Is Finely Tuned for Faces of One's Own Race , 2006, Psychological science.

[18]  S. Carey,et al.  Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. , 1986 .

[19]  Markus Kiefer,et al.  A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study , 2004, Cognition.

[20]  T. Perfect,et al.  Adult age differences in unconscious transference: Source confusion or identity blending? , 2003, Memory & cognition.

[21]  D. Levin.  Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[22]  Bruno Rossion,et al.  Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces , 2006 .

[23]  G. Rhodes,et al.  Expertise and configural coding in face recognition. , 1989, British journal of psychology.