An international survey and modified Delphi approach revealed numerous rapid review methods.

[1]  J. Fuller,et al.  Are nurses well placed as care co-ordinators in primary care and what is needed to develop their role: a rapid review? , 2016, Health & social care in the community.

[2]  Zachary Munn,et al.  The Development and Use of Evidence Summaries for Point of Care Information Systems: A Streamlined Rapid Review Approach. , 2015, Worldviews on evidence-based nursing.

[3]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  Advancing knowledge of rapid reviews: an analysis of results, conclusions and recommendations from published review articles examining rapid reviews , 2015, Systematic Reviews.

[4]  Daniel Hind,et al.  A rapid review indicated higher recruitment rates in treatment trials than in prevention trials. , 2015, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[5]  Lisa Hartling,et al.  EPC Methods: An Exploration of Methods and Context for the Production of Rapid Reviews , 2015 .

[6]  D. Hurley,et al.  Implementation fidelity of physiotherapist-delivered group education and exercise interventions to promote self-management in people with osteoarthritis and chronic low back pain: a rapid review part II. , 2015, Manual therapy.

[7]  P. Shekelle,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation , 2015, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[8]  R. B. van Leeuwen,et al.  The Efficacy of Vestibular Rehabilitation in Patients with Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo , 2014, Otolaryngology--head and neck surgery : official journal of American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

[9]  M. Donnelly,et al.  The late effects of cancer and cancer treatment: a rapid review. , 2014, The Journal of community and supportive oncology.

[10]  David Moher,et al.  Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach , 2012, Systematic Reviews.

[11]  I. Zechmeister,et al.  THE IMPACT OF HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT REPORTS ON DECISION MAKING IN AUSTRIA , 2012, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[12]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement , 2009, BMJ.

[13]  D. Moher,et al.  Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement , 2009, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[14]  M. Clarke,et al.  Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires , 2023, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[15]  David Hailey,et al.  A preliminary survey on the influence of rapid health technology assessments , 2009, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[16]  David Hailey,et al.  Rapid reviews versus full systematic reviews: An inventory of current methods and practice in health technology assessment , 2008, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[17]  D. Hailey.  Health technology assessment. , 2006, Singapore medical journal.

[18]  Maurice McGregor,et al.  End-user involvement in health technology assessment (HTA) development: A way to increase impact , 2005, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[19]  J. Herold,et al.  Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. , 2001, American journal of preventive medicine.

[20]  P Corabian,et al.  THE USE AND IMPACT OF RAPID HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENTS , 2000, International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care.

[21]  D. Dillman.  Mail and internet surveys , 1999 .

[22]  R. Brook,et al.  Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. , 1984, American journal of public health.