Differences between structural and functional environmental heterogeneity caused by seed dispersal

Summary 1This paper explores the idea that functional heterogeneity (variability of a system property affecting ecological processes) is only a fraction of the available structural heterogeneity (variability of a property measured without reference to ecological effects) caused by non-random propagule dispersal. We report the effect of acorn dispersal by jays on the light environment experienced by Holm Oaks (Quercus ilex L.) during early recruitment in a Mediterranean montane forest. 2Four light variables were estimated by studying hemispherical photographs: direct site factor (DSF); indirect site factor (ISF); and potential direct radiation during April (PDRApril) and August (PDRAugust). Means and variances of these variables were compared before and after the dispersal of acorns by jays. 3The landscape occupied by Holm Oaks was very heterogeneous, which translated into differences in the available light among microhabitats of up to one order of magnitude. 4Because of the spatial pattern of acorn dispersal, the light environment of the oaks during their establishment was much more homogeneous than that in the whole landscape. 5This demonstrates that the heterogeneity relevant for plant recruitment is not necessarily that of the landscape as a whole.

[1]  J. Gómez.  Importance of microhabitat and acorn burial on Quercus ilex early recruitment: non-additive effects on multiple demographic processes , 2004, Plant Ecology.

[2]  J. Retana,et al.  Seed germination and seedling performance of two Mediterranean tree species, holm oak (shape Quercus ilex L.) and Aleppo pine (shape Pinus halepensis Mill.): a multifactor experimental approach , 1998, Plant Ecology.

[3]  L. Gratani.  Canopy structure, vertical radiation profile and photosynthetic function in a Quercus ilex evergreen forest , 1997, Photosynthetica.

[4]  JASON R. ROXBURGH,et al.  USES AND LIMITATIONS OF HEMISPHERICAL PHOTOGRAPHY FOR ESTIMATING FOREST LIGHT ENVIRONMENTS , 2004 .

[5]  J. Gómez,et al.  Spatial patterns in long-distance dispersal of Quercus ilex acorns by jays in a heterogeneous landscape , 2003 .

[6]  M. Hutchings,et al.  TOWARD UNDERSTANDING THE CONSEQUENCES OF SOIL HETEROGENEITY FOR PLANT POPULATIONS AND COMMUNITIES , 2003 .

[7]  B. Beckage,et al.  SEEDLING SURVIVAL AND GROWTH OF THREE FOREST TREE SPECIES: THE ROLE OF SPATIAL HETEROGENEITY , 2003 .

[8]  Peter Chesson,et al.  Local dispersal can facilitate coexistence in the presence of permanent spatial heterogeneity , 2003 .

[9]  F. Valladares.  Light Heterogeneity and Plants: from Ecophysiology to Species Coexistence and Biodiversity , 2003 .

[10]  Fernando Valladares,et al.  Plasticity, instability and canalization: is the phenotypic variation in seedlings of sclerophyll oaks consistent with the environmental unpredictability of Mediterranean ecosystems? , 2002, The New phytologist.

[11]  J. Peñuelas,et al.  Comparative protective strategies of Cistus albidus and Quercus ilex facing photoinhibitory winter conditions , 2002 .

[12]  Wesley Rodrigues Silva,et al.  Seed dispersal and frugivory : ecology, evolution, and conservation , 2002 .

[13]  E. Schupp,et al.  Dissemination Limitation and the Origin and Maintenance of Species-Rich Tropical Forests , 2002 .

[14]  P. Jordano,et al.  Frugivore-generated seed shadows: a landscape view of demographic and genetic effects. , 2002 .

[15]  R. O'Neill,et al.  Landscape Ecology Explained@@@Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process , 2001 .

[16]  F. Valladares,et al.  Low leaf-level response to light and nutrients in Mediterranean evergreen oaks: a conservative resource-use strategy? , 2000, The New phytologist.

[17]  Alan J. A. Stewart,et al.  The Ecological Consequences of Environmental Heterogeneity , 2000 .

[18]  A. Stewart,et al.  The ecological consequences of environmental heterogeneity. The 40th Symposium of the British Ecological Society held at the University of Sussex, UK, 23-25 March 1999. , 2000 .

[19]  A. Sparrow,et al.  A heterogeneity of heterogeneities. , 1999, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  Kawata,et al.  Perceptual scales of spatial heterogeneity of periphyton for freshwater snails , 1999 .

[21]  N. Bertin,et al.  Light and temperature dependence of the emission of cyclic and acyclic monoterpenes from holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) leaves , 1998 .

[22]  J. Abadía,et al.  Differences in the response of carbon assimilation to summer stress (water deficits, high light and temperature) in four Mediterranean tree species , 1998 .

[23]  J. Wiens.  The Emerging Role of Patchiness in Conservation Biology , 1997 .

[24]  F. Bazzaz.  Plants in Changing Environments: Linking Physiological, Population, and Community Ecology , 1996 .

[25]  Josep Maria Espelta,et al.  Patterns of seedling recruitment in West‐Mediterranean Quercus ilex forest influenced by canopy development , 1995 .

[26]  J. Reynolds,et al.  On definition and quantification of heterogeneity , 1995 .

[27]  Robert W. Pearcy,et al.  Exploitation of environmental heterogeneity by plants: ecophysiological processes above- and belowground , 1994 .

[28]  Pierre Dutilleul,et al.  Spatial Heterogeneity against Heteroscedasticity: An Ecological Paradigm versus a Statistical Concept , 1993 .

[29]  S. Turton,et al.  Light environments and floristic composition across an open forest-rainforest boundary in northeastern Queensland , 1992 .

[30]  J. Chen,et al.  Defining leaf area index for non‐flat leaves , 1992 .

[31]  J. Chen,et al.  Evaluation of hemispherical photography for determining plant area index and geometry of a forest stand , 1991 .

[32]  J. Kolasa,et al.  Introduction: The Heterogeneity of Heterogeneity: A Glossary , 1991 .

[33]  P. Rich.  Characterizing plant canopies with hemispherical photographs. , 1990 .

[34]  G. Campbell.  Extinction coefficients for radiation in plant canopies calculated using an ellipsoidal inclination angle distribution , 1986 .

[35]  K. Abromeit.  Music Received , 2023, Notes.