The Agent's Agent: Power, Knowledge, and Uncertainty in Management Consultancy

The existence of so many metaphors for the management consultant (e.g., as performer, as witchdoctor) betokens the fundamental uncertainty of consultancy work. This article suggests that the application of agency theory to the client-consultant relationship may be a useful way of exploring and mapping this uncertainty. The image of consultants as the "agent's agent" (hopefully, not just another metaphor) pictures consultancy as defined by an extended agency role: The consultant is the agent of management, which is itself the agent of capital. In seeing consultancy in this way, as a kind of extrusion of managerial power, attention is drawn to its tenuous legitimacy in client firms, as well as to a kind of parity between consultancy and management. The article highlights two central aspects of uncertainty--power and knowledge--and explores these in research conducted in large-scale firms like the Big Five. The data confirm the importance of consultancy as "relational work" and the subordination of consultancy. Typical agency problems were mirrored in the limits of power tactics employed in client firms and the difficulties of transfer between consultant and local managerial knowledge.

[1]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The consultants' offensive: reengineering - from fad to technique , 1999 .

[2]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  The Consultancy Process — An Insecure Business? , 1997 .

[3]  D. L. Flarey.  Reengineering the Corporation , 1994 .

[4]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  Understanding consultancy as performance: the dramaturgical metaphor , 2019, Professions at Bay.

[5]  Robert Jackall,et al.  Moral mazes: The world of corporate managers , 1989 .

[6]  E. Schein.  Process Consultation : Its Role in Organization Development , 1969 .

[7]  Larry E. Greiner,et al.  Consulting to Management , 1982 .

[8]  Thráinn Eggertsson,et al.  Economic behavior and institutions , 1991 .

[9]  W. Starbuck.  Learning by Knowledge-Intensive Firms , 1992 .

[10]  Stewart Clegg,et al.  Frameworks of power , 1989 .

[11]  B. Jackson.  Management Gurus and Management Fashions , 2001 .

[12]  Chris Argyris,et al.  Intervention Theory and Method. , 1974 .

[13]  John Micklethwait,et al.  The Witch Doctors: Making Sense of the Management Gurus , 1996 .

[14]  Alan Bryman,et al.  ORGANIZATION STUDIES AND THE CONCEPT OF RATIONALITY , 1984 .

[15]  Anders W Johansson,et al.  Professionalism and politics in management consultancy work , 2001 .

[16]  Antti Ainamo,et al.  The metanarrative of 'change' and the contestable (re)construction of management ideas , 2001 .

[17]  Michael Rowlinson.  Organisations and Institutions , 1997 .

[18]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  THE ROLE OF MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: THE INDISSOLUBLE NATURE OF SOCIO‐POLITICAL AND TECHNICAL SKILLS* , 1995 .

[19]  Clive Holtham,et al.  The Politics of Organisational Decision Making , 1975 .

[20]  J. Kotter.  The General Managers , 1982 .

[21]  Graeme Salaman,et al.  The Management Guru as Organizational Witchdoctor , 1996 .

[22]  Graham Cleverley,et al.  Managers and Magic , 1971 .

[23]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[24]  D. Maister.  Managing the Professional Service Firm , 1997 .

[25]  Peter Armstrong.  Management, Labour Process and Agency , 1989 .

[26]  T. Clark,et al.  The use of metaphor in the client-consultant relationship: A study of management consultants , 1996 .

[27]  Barbara Czarniawska,et al.  Travels of ideas. , 1996 .

[28]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  The Dialectics of Consultancy , 1997 .

[29]  B. E. Partridge,et al.  The Nature of Managerial Work , 1974 .

[30]  Mats Alvesson,et al.  Organizations As Rhetoric: Knowledge‐Intensive Firms And The Struggle With Ambiguity , 1993 .