Proportional frequency compression of speech for listeners with sensorineural hearing loss.

This study examined proportional frequency compression as a strategy for improving speech recognition in listeners with high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss. This method of frequency compression preserved the ratios between the frequencies of the components of natural speech, as well as the temporal envelope of the unprocessed speech stimuli. Nonsense syllables spoken by a female and a male talker were used as the speech materials. Both frequency-compressed speech and the control condition of unprocessed speech were presented with high-pass amplification. For the materials spoken by the female talker, significant increases in speech recognition were observed in slightly less than one-half of the listeners with hearing impairment. For the male-talker materials, one-fifth of the hearing-impaired listeners showed significant recognition improvements. The increases in speech recognition due solely to frequency compression were generally smaller than those solely due to high-pass amplification. The results indicate that while high-pass amplification is still the most effective approach for improving speech recognition of listeners with high-frequency hearing loss, proportional frequency compression can offer significant improvements in addition to those provided by amplification for some patients.

[1]  C M Reed,et al.  Discrimination and identification of frequency-lowered speech in listeners with high-frequency hearing impairment. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  C. Turner,et al.  Speech audibility for listeners with high-frequency hearing loss. , 1999, American journal of audiology.

[3]  G. A. Miller,et al.  An Analysis of Perceptual Confusions Among Some English Consonants , 1955 .

[4]  C M Reed,et al.  Discrimination of speech processed by low-pass filtering and pitch-invariant frequency lowering. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  D D Dirks,et al.  Speech recognition and the Articulation Index for normal and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  M Nagafuchi,et al.  Intelligibility of distorted speech sounds shifted in frequency and time in normal children. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.

[7]  R. Daniloff,et al.  Intelligibility of vowels altered in duration and frequency. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  B. Johansson,et al.  The Use of the Transposer for the Management of the Deaf Child , 1966 .

[9]  G. E. Peterson,et al.  Control Methods Used in a Study of the Vowels , 1951 .

[10]  R. Shannon,et al.  Recognition of spectrally degraded and frequency-shifted vowels in acoustic and electric hearing. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  M. Mazor,et al.  Moderate frequency compression for the moderately hearing impaired. , 1977, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  D. Broadbent,et al.  Information Conveyed by Vowels , 1957 .

[13]  C V Pavlovic Use of the articulation index for assessing residual auditory function in listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  C M Reed,et al.  Intelligibility of frequency-lowered speech produced by a channel vocoder. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[16]  J Jerger,et al.  Comparison of performance with frequency transposition hearing aids and conventional hearing aids. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[17]  K. Stevens,et al.  On the Properties of Voiceless Fricative Consonants , 1961 .

[18]  N Guttman,et al.  An instrument that creates some artificial speech spectra for the severely hard of hearing. , 1968, American annals of the deaf.

[19]  Stuart Rosen,et al.  Perceptual adaptation by normal listeners to upward shifts of spectral information in speech and its relevance for users of cochlear implants , 1997 .

[20]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[21]  D Ling,et al.  Three experiments on frequency transposition. , 1968, American annals of the deaf.

[22]  A. Thornton,et al.  Speech-discrimination scores modeled as a binomial variable. , 1978, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[23]  W P Wallace,et al.  Transfer effects from listening to frequency-controlled and frequency-shifted accelerated speech. , 1981, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[24]  T. M. Nearey Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[25]  C M Reed,et al.  Hearing aids--a review of past research on linear amplification, amplitude compression, and frequency lowering. , 1979, ASHA monographs.

[26]  D J Orchik,et al.  Use of frequency-shifted/time-compressed speech with hearing-impaired children. , 1976, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.