A New Era in Porous Metals: Applications in Orthopaedics

The development of porous metals and coatings has revolutionized the field of orthopaedics. However, most implants are fabricated utilizing traditional materials (i.e. sintered beads, fiber metal, plasma spray), which have several inherent limitations. Several new porous metals have been recently introduced to improve upon the biomaterial properties of these traditional metals. Tritanium (Stryker, Mahwah, NJ), Regenerex (Biomet, Warsaw, IN), Stiktite (Smith and Nephew, Memphis, TN), and Trabecular Metal (Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) are currently available for use in orthopaedic surgery, all with a characteristic appearance similar to cancellous bone. The open-cell structure of these materials affords several intriguing properties, including; high volumetric porosity (60–80 %), low modulus of elasticity, and high frictional characteristics. The following represents a review of the biomaterial properties and applications in orthopaedic surgery for this new class of highly porous metals.

[1]  A. Hanssen,et al.  Use of porous tantalum metaphyseal cones for severe tibial bone loss during revision total knee replacement. , 2008, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[2]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The optimum pore size for the fixation of porous-surfaced metal implants by the ingrowth of bone. , 1980, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[3]  Hai-sheng Li,et al.  Pedicle Screw Fixation Enhances Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion With Porous Tantalum Cages: An Experimental Study in Pigs , 2005, Spine.

[4]  G. Scuderi**,et al.  Management of Bone Loss: Augments, Cones, Offset Stems , 2006, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[5]  L D Zardiackas,et al.  Structure, metallurgy, and mechanical properties of a porous tantalum foam. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[6]  J. Galante,et al.  Sintered fiber metal composites as a basis for attachment of implants to bone. , 1971, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[7]  R M Pilliar,et al.  The effect of movement on the bonding of porous metal to bone. , 1973, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[8]  D. Robertson,et al.  Biomechanical and clinical evaluations of a porous tantalum implant for the treatment of early-stage osteonecrosis. , 2005, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[9]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Fibrous tissue ingrowth and attachment to porous tantalum. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[10]  S. H. Weeden,et al.  The use of tantalum porous metal implants for Paprosky 3A and 3B defects. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[11]  J. Robertson,et al.  Clinical experience with porous tantalum cervical interbody implants in a prospective randomized controlled trial , 2003, British journal of neurosurgery.

[12]  Hai-sheng Li,et al.  Bone ingrowth characteristics of porous tantalum and carbon fiber interbody devices: an experimental study in pigs. , 2004, The spine journal : official journal of the North American Spine Society.

[13]  M. Rooks,et al.  Porous tantalum implant in early osteonecrosis of the hip: preliminary report on operative, survival, and outcomes results. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[14]  K. Iesaka,et al.  Bone response to a novel highly porous surface in a canine implantable chamber. , 2004, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[15]  S. Sporer,et al.  Acetabular revision using a trabecular metal acetabular component for severe acetabular bone loss associated with a pelvic discontinuity. , 2006, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[16]  Michael Tanzer,et al.  Characteristics of bone ingrowth and interface mechanics of a new porous tantalum biomaterial , 1999 .

[17]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Applications of porous tantalum in total hip arthroplasty. , 2006, The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.

[18]  A. Lombardi,et al.  Evolution of tibial fixation in total knee arthroplasty. , 2007, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[19]  Joshua J Jacobs,et al.  Experimental and clinical performance of porous tantalum in orthopedic surgery. , 2006, Biomaterials.

[20]  P. Griss,et al.  Implant fixation by bone ingrowth. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.