The dynamics of client–consultant relationships: exploring the interplay of power and knowledge

In this paper, we investigate the dynamics of client–consultant relationships and analyze how power and knowledge are shared and negotiated between consultants and clients during the implementation of configurable technologies. Empirical evidence is provided by three case studies representing three classic types of client–consultant relationships. We draw on two complementary perspectives: possession view (i.e., power and knowledge are based on resources that can be owned or controlled by individuals) and practice view (i.e., power and knowledge are relational in nature and exercised in action). The paper develops a framework that shows that power and knowledge are closely intertwined and that the possession and practice views are complementary in understanding configurable technology projects. The paper also demonstrates the importance of the initial set-up of the project and how knowing/powering mechanisms can reinforce or change implementation trajectories, which, in turn, can affect project results.

[1]  Sudhir Gupta,et al.  Case Studies , 2013, Journal of Clinical Immunology.

[2]  P. Asaro.  Transforming society by transforming technology: the science and politics of participatory design , 2000 .

[3]  Robin Fincham,et al.  The Consultant–Client Relationship: Critical Perspectives on the Management of Organizational Change , 1999 .

[4]  E. Schein.  Process Consultation : Its Role in Organization Development , 1969 .

[5]  Ben Light,et al.  Going beyond 'misfit' as a reason for ERP package customisation , 2005, Comput. Ind..

[6]  E. Wenger.  Communities of Practice and Social Learning Systems , 2000 .

[7]  Andrew B. Hargadon,et al.  Brainstorming groups in context: Effectiveness in a product design firm , 1996 .

[8]  Andrew Sturdy,et al.  The Consultancy Process — An Insecure Business? , 1997 .

[9]  Jacky Swan,et al.  The diffusion, design and social shaping of production management information systems in Europe , 2000, Inf. Technol. People.

[10]  Robert G. Fichman,et al.  An Incremental Process for Software Implementation , 1999 .

[11]  Eric van Heck,et al.  Local adaptations of generic application systems: the case of Veiling Holambra in Brazil , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Samar Mouakket,et al.  Varieties of Political Process During Systems Development , 1997, Inf. Syst. Res..

[13]  S. Ranson.  The Structuring of Organizational Structures. , 1980 .

[14]  J. Fleck.  Learning by trying: the implementation of configurational technology☆ , 1994 .

[15]  T. Clark,et al.  Telling Tales: Management Gurus' Narratives and the Construction of Managerial Identity , 1998 .

[16]  Andrew Kakabadse,et al.  Consultant's role: a qualitative inquiry from the consultant's perspective. , 2006 .

[17]  C. Avgerou,et al.  Information Technology in Context: Studies from the Perspective of Developing Countries , 2001 .

[18]  Hugh Willmott,et al.  Re-Embedding Situatedness: The Importance of Power Relations in Learning Theory , 2003, Organ. Sci..

[19]  S. Newell,et al.  Networks, Knowledge and Power: Decision Making, Politics and the Process of Innovation , 2000 .

[20]  K. Eisold,et al.  Psychoanalytic Perspectives on Organizational Consulting: Transference and Counter-Transference , 2003 .

[21]  Eivor Oborn,et al.  Boundary object use in cross-cultural software development teams , 2010 .

[22]  Barbara Simpson,et al.  Pragmatism, Mead and the Practice Turn , 2009 .

[23]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Power, politics, and MIS implementation , 1987, CACM.

[24]  William H. Glick,et al.  Studying Changes in Organizational Design and Effectiveness: Retrospective Event Histories and Periodic Assessments , 1990 .

[25]  Robert Pellerin,et al.  ERP implementation through critical success factors' management , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  V. Murray,et al.  Illusions and Other Games: A Trifocal View of Organizational Politics , 1991 .

[27]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation , 1991 .

[28]  L. Melin,et al.  Strategy as Practice: Research Directions and Resources , 2007 .

[29]  K. Weick.  Making Sense of the Organization , 2000 .

[30]  Cliff Oswick,et al.  Images of an organisation: the use of metaphor in a multinational company , 1999 .

[31]  Peter H. Gray,et al.  The impact of knowledge repositories on power and control in the workplace , 2001, Inf. Technol. People.

[32]  Russell Williams.  The client’s role in the consulting relationship: is there “con” in consulting? , 2001 .

[33]  Edgar H. Schein,et al.  Empowerment, coercive persuasion and organizational learning: do they connect? , 1999 .

[34]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  THE ROLE OF MANAGEMENT CONSULTANTS IN THE DEVELOPMENT OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY: THE INDISSOLUBLE NATURE OF SOCIO‐POLITICAL AND TECHNICAL SKILLS* , 1995 .

[35]  Vallabh Sambamurthy,et al.  Special Issue on Information Technology and Knowledge Management , 2005 .

[36]  Kathy McGrath,et al.  Power, Rationality, and the Art of Living Through Socio-Technical Change , 2007, MIS Q..

[37]  Knut H. Rolland,et al.  Balancing the Local and the Global in Infrastructural Information Systems , 2002, Inf. Soc..

[38]  A. Langley.  Strategies for Theorizing from Process Data , 1999 .

[39]  Richard Heeks,et al.  Explaining ERP failure in a developing country: a Jordanian case study , 2010, J. Enterp. Inf. Manag..

[40]  F. A. Wilson,et al.  The truth is out there: the search for emancipatory principles in information systems design , 1997, Inf. Technol. People.

[41]  Natalia Levina,et al.  Collaborating on Multi-Party Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View , 2005, Inf. Syst. Res..

[42]  E. Wenger.  Communities of practice and social learning systems”. Organization :. , 2000 .

[43]  D. Yanow.  Translating Local Knowledge at Organizational Peripheries , 2004 .

[44]  W. G. Astley,et al.  Structural Sources of Intraorganizational: Power: A Theoretical Synthesis , 1984 .

[45]  Kate Gilbert,et al.  “Consultancy fatigue”: epidemiology, symptoms and prevention , 1998 .

[46]  Brian S. Butler,et al.  Power and Information Technology Research: A Metatriangulation Review , 2002, MIS Q..

[47]  Debra Howcroft,et al.  Paradoxes of participatory practices: the Janus role of the systems developer , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[48]  James Fleck,et al.  Configurations: Crystallizing contingency , 1993 .

[49]  C. Glesne,et al.  Glesne, Corrine, Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 2nd ed. New York: Longman, 1999. , 1999 .

[50]  Alain Pinsonneault,et al.  Global-local negotiations for implementing configurable packages: The power of initial organizational decisions , 2005, J. Strateg. Inf. Syst..

[51]  M. Schwarz,et al.  Guess who's coming to dinner? Structures and uses of liminality in strategic management consultancy , 2006 .

[52]  Michelle L. Kaarst-Brown.  Five symbolic roles of the external consultant – Integrating change, power and symbolism , 1999 .

[53]  G. Currie,et al.  Political and Cultural Issues in the Case of Intranet Implementation The Limits of a Technological Fix to Knowledge Management : Epistemological , 2004 .

[54]  Marie-Claude Boudreau,et al.  Enacting Integrated Information Technology: A Human Agency Perspective , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[55]  J. Brown,et al.  Bridging epistemologies: The generative dance between organizational knowledge and organizational knowing , 1999 .

[56]  Mordecai Lee,et al.  Management history as told by popular culture: the screen image of the efficiency expert , 2002 .

[57]  Naomi Hossain,et al.  GUESS WHO’S COMING TO DINNER , 2020, Chinese Primer, Volumes 1-3 (Pinyin).

[58]  S. Pan,et al.  Knowledge Management in Practice: An Exploratory Case Study , 1999 .

[59]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Re-Presenting Technology: It Consultancy Reports as Textual Reality Constructions , 1994 .

[60]  Matthew Jones,et al.  The expert system: constructing expertise in an IT/management consultancy , 2003, Inf. Organ..

[61]  Yvette Taminiau,et al.  Innovation in management consulting firms through informal knowledge sharing , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[62]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[63]  N. Marshall,et al.  Maybe Bacon Had a Point: The Politics of Interpretation in Collective Sensemaking , 2004 .

[64]  Anthony Mills,et al.  Implementation of enterprise resource planning (ERP) software in a major construction contracting organization in Hong Kong , 2011 .

[65]  Robin Fincham,et al.  PERSPECTIVES ON POWER: PROCESSUAL, INSTITUTIONAL AND ‘INTERNAL’FORMS OF ORGANIZATIONAL POWER , 1992 .

[66]  Paul R. Carlile,et al.  A Pragmatic View of Knowledge and Boundaries: Boundary Objects in New Product Development , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[67]  Tim Brady,et al.  Knowledge management and the politics of knowledge: illustrations from complex products and systems , 2001, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[68]  G. Currie,et al.  The Limits of a Technological Fix to Knowledge Management , 2004 .

[69]  Jean-Louis Denis,et al.  Leadership and Strategic Change under Ambiguity , 1996 .

[70]  Brian P. Bloomfield,et al.  Management Consultants: Systems Development, Power and the Translation of Problems , 1992 .

[71]  Davide Nicolini,et al.  Practice as the Site of Knowing: Insights from the Field of Telemedicine , 2011, Organ. Sci..

[72]  Robin Williams.  Universal solutions or local contingencies , 1997 .

[73]  Cynthia Hardy,et al.  The Power Behind Empowerment: Implications for Research and Practice , 1998 .

[74]  Robert D. Galliers,et al.  The creation of 'best practice' software: Myth, reality and ethics , 2006, Inf. Organ..

[75]  W. Orlikowski.  Sociomaterial Practices: Exploring Technology at Work , 2007 .

[76]  Wanda J. Orlikowski,et al.  Knowing in practice: Enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing , 2002, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[77]  Robin Fincham,et al.  Researching Situated Learning , 2007 .