BACKGROUND
Social media use has become common for organisations in surgery, however the nature and reach of these communications is unknown. This study aimed to characterise and compare the use of "Twitter" by five prominent organisations in surgery.
STUDY DESIGN
Data were collected from Twitter and the scale, reach, nature and sentiment of messages analysed. Message influence was determined and content analysed by frequency and association using hierarchical clustering and network analysis. Poisson regression was used to compare institutional message and "re-tweet" counts.
RESULTS
7712 messages were analysed from a four-year period up to 13th April 2013. The American College of Surgeons (ACS) had tweeted most and posted the greatest number of messages per day (3.3/day). The number of followers reflects social reach and the Royal College of Surgeons of England (RCSEng) had the greatest number (11,600) followed by the ACS (7320). The number of "retweets" a message receives is a measure of influence with the RCSEng (2.0) demonstrating a significantly greater count than the Royal College of Surgeons of Ireland (RCSI; 0.8, p < 0.001) and the ACS (1.3, p < 0.001). Followers of the RCSEng and ACS appeared most influential. Terms relating to education feature prominently in messages posted by the RCSEng and RCSEd, but less so in those from the RCSI and ACS. Education and training terms were highly correlated with "events".
CONCLUSIONS
Surgical colleges have significant international reach through social media. UK colleges frequently communicate about education/training opportunities while the ACS focuses on patient-related matters. Only one organisation was found to have an explicit social media policy, which would be considered best practice and can focus on-line activity.
[1]
Lillian Lee,et al.
Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis
,
2008,
Found. Trends Inf. Retr..
[2]
Stephen M Warren,et al.
Social networking services: implications for the next generation of physicians.
,
2011,
Surgery.
[3]
How surgical residents use social media.
,
2011,
Surgery.
[4]
A. Bernardo,et al.
Huberman, Romero, and Wu, Fang. . Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope.
,
2008
.
[5]
Adam D. I. Kramer.
An unobtrusive behavioral model of "gross national happiness"
,
2010,
CHI.
[6]
Fang Wu,et al.
Social Networks that Matter: Twitter Under the Microscope
,
2008,
First Monday.
[7]
Sarah J Mansfield,et al.
Social media and the medical profession
,
2011,
The Medical journal of Australia.
[8]
D. Mills,et al.
The marriage of plastic surgery and social media: a relationship to last a lifetime.
,
2012,
Aesthetic surgery journal.
[9]
Katie M Wells,et al.
Social media in medical school education.
,
2011,
Surgery.
[10]
Frank G Opelka.
Social networking in health care: surgeons and their patients.
,
2011,
Surgery.
[11]
David Pendleton,et al.
Values and leadership
,
2002,
BMJ : British Medical Journal.
[12]
Danah Boyd,et al.
I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience
,
2011,
New Media Soc..