Radiographic observers' ability to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT.

OBJECTIVES To assess radiographic observers' ability to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT and to decide early termination of the examination. METHODS 100 patients were video-recorded during cone beam CT examination. Patients' videos were cropped twice: fitting the active 20-s examination time or the initial non-radiation 3 s of the examination. x- and y-coordinates of pre-defined points marked on the patient's face were used to define the reference standard for movement in the 20-s videos. A sample of 40 non-moving and 20 moving patients was selected. Eight observers scored the videos. The 3-s videos were scored: 0, the patient did not move; 1, the patient moved and the examination should be terminated. The 20-s videos were scored: 0, the patient did not move; 1, the patient moved. Re-assessment of 15% of the videos provided intra-observer reproducibility. The 20-s videos were compared with the reference standard providing sensitivity and specificity values (movement/non-movement recognition). The scores of the 3-s videos were compared with the scores of the 20-s videos. RESULTS Intra- and interobserver reproducibility ranged from substantial to almost perfect for both videos. The 20-s videos allowed patient movement recognition with a high specificity and a medium to high sensitivity. The 3-s videos allowed early termination of the examination with a small number of incorrect positive scores. The majority of the patients scored as moving in the 20-s videos were detected in the 3-s videos. CONCLUSIONS By observing video recordings, trained observers are able to recognize patient movement during cone beam CT examination with high specificity and to decide an early termination of the examination.

[1]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 1: Physical Principles , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[2]  M. Yoon,et al.  Respiratory motional effect on cone-beam CT in lung radiation surgery. , 2009, Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists.

[3]  A Wenzel,et al.  Cone beam CT image artefacts related to head motion simulated by a robot skull: visual characteristics and impact on image quality. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[4]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Lung Deformation Estimation and Four-Dimensional CT Lung Reconstruction , 2005, MICCAI.

[5]  D. Hill,et al.  Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. , 2004, The British journal of radiology.

[6]  M. V. van Herk,et al.  Respiratory correlated cone beam CT. , 2005, Medical physics.

[7]  A. Wenzel,et al.  Regulations in the Nordic countries concerning oral and maxillofacial radiographic imaging technologies and their use , 2009, Den norske tannlegeforenings Tidende.

[8]  M. A. G. Silva,et al.  Dosimetry of the cone beam computed tomography Veraviewepocs 3D compared with the 3D Accuitomo in different fields of view. , 2008, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[9]  Max A. Viergever,et al.  Mutual-information-based registration of medical images: a survey , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[10]  S. Mukherji,et al.  Conebeam CT of the Head and Neck, Part 2: Clinical Applications , 2009, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[11]  Francisco Haiter-Neto,et al.  Influence of cone-beam computed tomography image artifacts on the determination of dental arch measurements. , 2014, The Angle orthodontist.

[12]  E. Barbato,et al.  The accuracy of CBCT in measuring jaws bone density. , 2012, European review for medical and pharmacological sciences.

[13]  A Wenzel,et al.  Development of a system for craniofacial analysis from monitor-displayed digital images. , 1999, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[14]  R Schulze,et al.  Artefacts in CBCT: a review. , 2011, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[15]  K Donaldson,et al.  Dental cone beam CT image quality possibly reduced by patient movement. , 2013, Dento maxillo facial radiology.

[16]  Tomáš Hanzelka,et al.  Reduction of the negative influence of patient motion on quality of CBCT scan. , 2010, Medical hypotheses.