The role of mock-ups in the anticipation of the user experience within a living lab: An empirical study

This paper presents an empirical study focusing on the role of mock-ups to support user/citizens co-creation and the anticipation of the User eXperience within a specific urban Living Lab. Scholars have previously identified different principles characterizing a Living Lab, such as: "realism", spontaneity, continuity and empowerment, which represent the "live" dimension of Living Labs. However, these principles are quite difficult to practically implement. Nonetheless, we conducted an experiment in the context of an urban project dedicated to the design of mobility stations that reveals the paramount importance of the mock-up role for implementing the "realism" principle. The findings unveil the great potential of close-to-real-life immersion of users/citizens in realistic environments to not only fulfilling the "realism" principle but also greatly contributing to the adoption by users/citizens. Finally, this study gives some elements to support citizens' engagement in the co-creation stage of the urban design process towards the realization of smart-cities.

[1]  Anna-Greta Nyström,et al.  On becoming creative consumers – user roles in living labs networks , 2014 .

[2]  Carina Veeckman,et al.  The city as living labortory: A playground for the innovative development of smart city applications , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE).

[3]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition , 2003 .

[4]  Gianluca Elia,et al.  To what extent the practice on living labs match with the theoretical framework? The case of VINCENTE Living Lab for the creation of technology entrepreneurship , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE).

[5]  Bill Moggridge,et al.  Designing interactions , 2006 .

[6]  S. Juujärvi,et al.  Actor Roles in an Urban Living Lab: What Can We Learn from Suurpelto, Finland? , 2013 .

[7]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design: Beyond Human-Computer Interaction , 2002 .

[8]  Fred D. Davis Perceived Usefulness, Perceived Ease of Use, and User Acceptance of Information Technology , 1989, MIS Q..

[9]  Gunnar Stevens,et al.  Supporting the Collaborative Appropriation of an Open Software Ecosystem , 2011, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[10]  Gregory D. Abowd,et al.  The Aware Home: A Living Laboratory for Ubiquitous Computing Research , 1999, CoBuild.

[11]  Marc Pallot,et al.  Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience towards User Cocreation , 2010 .

[12]  Asbjørn Følstad,et al.  Living Labs for Innovation and Development of Information and Communication Technology: A Literature Review , 2008 .

[13]  H. Freud Emotional Design Why We Love Or Hate Everyday Things , 2016 .

[14]  Aarnout Brombacher,et al.  EXPERIENTIAL DESIGN LANDSCAPES: DESIGN RESEARCH IN THE WILD , 2013 .

[15]  E. von Hippel,et al.  Sources of Innovation , 2016 .

[16]  Alexander Richter,et al.  Exploring Appropriation of Enterprise Wikis: , 2012, Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW).

[17]  Laure Morel,et al.  Study case: Living Lab Mode for urban project design: Emergence of an ad hoc methodology through collaborative innovation , 2014, 2014 International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE).

[18]  Pieter Verdegem,et al.  Rethinking determinants of ICT acceptance: Towards an integrated and comprehensive overview , 2011 .

[19]  Laurent Dupont,et al.  Lorraine Smart Cities Living Lab: white paper on living labs , 2011 .

[20]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Interaction Design - Beyond Human-Computer Interaction, 3rd Edition , 2012 .

[21]  Jodi Forlizzi,et al.  Building Change: Constructive Design of Smart Domestic Environments for Goal Achievement , 2015, CHI.

[22]  Muriel Zimmerman,et al.  Design Research Through Practice: From the Lab, Field, and Showroom , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[23]  Anna Ståhlbröst,et al.  Forming future IT: the living lab way of user involvement , 2008 .

[24]  N. Skiba,et al.  A space for innovation process acceleration, supporting collaborative citizens workshops , 2012, 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation.

[25]  Antti Oulasvirta,et al.  Everyday appropriations of information technology: A study of creative uses of digital cameras , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[26]  Karen Holtzblatt,et al.  Contextual design , 1997, INTR.

[27]  Pieter Ballon,et al.  Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation: Examining European Practice , 2005 .

[28]  Brian K. Smith,et al.  Bodystorming Mobile Learning Experiences , 2013, TechTrends.

[29]  M. Pallot,et al.  A holistic model of user experience for living lab experiential design , 2012, 2012 18th International ICE Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation.

[30]  Maija Federley,et al.  Boundary conditions for successful Urban Living Labs , 2014 .

[31]  Laurent Dupont,et al.  Le « technicien-citoyen » et La Fabrique Nancy Grand Cœur : le prisme de l’usage dans la conception d’un écoquartier , 2015 .

[32]  Gordon B. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View , 2003, MIS Q..

[33]  Stephen Flowers,et al.  Harnessing the hackers: The emergence and exploitation of Outlaw Innovation , 2008 .

[34]  M. Eriksson State-ofthe-art in utilizing Living Labs approach to user-centric ICT innovation-a European approach , 2005 .

[35]  Nathalie Skiba Processus d'innovation centré sur l'utilisateur : identification des besoins et interprétation des données issues de l'integration de l'utilisateur dans le processus de co-conception , 2014 .

[36]  Jim Miller The User Experience , 2005, IEEE Internet Comput..

[37]  Lieven De Marez,et al.  The Challenge of User- and QoE-Centric Research and Product Development in Today's ICT-Environment , 1970 .

[38]  E. Hippel,et al.  Lead users: a source of novel product concepts , 1986 .

[39]  Laure Morel,et al.  From Urban Concept to Urban Engineering: The Contribution of Distributed Collaborative Design to the Management of Urban Projects , 2012 .

[40]  F. Sleeswijk Visser,et al.  Bringing the everyday life of people into design , 2009 .