Can Peanuts Fall in Love with Distributional Semantics?
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Megan D. Bardolph,et al. Strong Prediction: Language Model Surprisal Explains Multiple N400 Effects , 2023, Neurobiology of language.
[2] James A. Michaelov,et al. Collateral facilitation in humans and language models , 2022, CONLL.
[3] Kara D. Federmeier,et al. Context-based facilitation of semantic access follows both logarithmic and linear functions of stimulus probability , 2021, Journal of memory and language.
[4] James A. Michaelov,et al. So Cloze Yet So Far: N400 Amplitude Is Better Predicted by Distributional Information Than Human Predictability Judgements , 2021, IEEE Transactions on Cognitive and Developmental Systems.
[5] Benjamin K. Bergen,et al. Different kinds of cognitive plausibility: why are transformers better than RNNs at predicting N400 amplitude? , 2021, CogSci.
[6] Stella Biderman,et al. GPT-Neo: Large Scale Autoregressive Language Modeling with Mesh-Tensorflow , 2021 .
[7] S. Frank,et al. Human Sentence Processing: Recurrence or Attention? , 2020, CMCL.
[8] Peter Ford Dominey,et al. A Model of Online Temporal-Spatial Integration for Immediacy and Overrule in Discourse Comprehension , 2020, Neurobiology of Language.
[9] Benjamin K. Bergen,et al. How well does surprisal explain N400 amplitude under different experimental conditions? , 2020, CONLL.
[10] Julia Taylor Rayz,et al. Exploring BERT’s sensitivity to lexical cues using tests from semantic priming , 2020, FINDINGS.
[11] Bettina Berendt,et al. RobBERT: a Dutch RoBERTa-based Language Model , 2020, FINDINGS.
[12] Hinrich Schütze,et al. Negated and Misprimed Probes for Pretrained Language Models: Birds Can Talk, But Cannot Fly , 2019, ACL.
[13] Joel Nothman,et al. SciPy 1.0-Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python , 2019, ArXiv.
[14] Yuji Matsumoto,et al. Wikipedia2Vec: An Efficient Toolkit for Learning and Visualizing the Embeddings of Words and Entities from Wikipedia , 2018, EMNLP.
[15] Tommaso Caselli,et al. BERTje: A Dutch BERT Model , 2019, ArXiv.
[16] Natalia Gimelshein,et al. PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library , 2019, NeurIPS.
[17] Kohske Takahashi,et al. Welcome to the Tidyverse , 2019, J. Open Source Softw..
[18] K. Dijkstra,et al. Situation model updating in young and older adults , 2019, International Journal of Behavioral Development.
[19] Stefan L. Frank,et al. Evaluating information-theoretic measures of word prediction in naturalistic sentence reading , 2019, Neuropsychologia.
[20] Omer Levy,et al. RoBERTa: A Robustly Optimized BERT Pretraining Approach , 2019, ArXiv.
[21] Franklin Chang,et al. Language ERPs reflect learning through prediction error propagation , 2019, Cognitive Psychology.
[22] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. Expectation-based Comprehension: Modeling the Interaction of World Knowledge and Linguistic Experience , 2019 .
[23] Stefan Frank,et al. Comparing Gated and Simple Recurrent Neural Network Architectures as Models of Human Sentence Processing , 2018, CogSci.
[24] Ilya Sutskever,et al. Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners , 2019 .
[25] Rémi Louf,et al. Transformers : State-ofthe-art Natural Language Processing , 2019 .
[26] Ming-Wei Chang,et al. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding , 2019, NAACL.
[27] Walter Kintsch,et al. Revisiting the Construction—Integration Model of Text Comprehension and its Implications for Instruction , 2018, Theoretical Models and Processes of Literacy.
[28] Gina R. Kuperberg,et al. A Tale of Two Positivities (and the N400): Distinct neural signatures are evoked by confirmed and violated predictions at different levels of representation , 2018, bioRxiv.
[29] James L. McClelland,et al. Modelling the N400 brain potential as change in a probabilistic representation of meaning , 2018, Nature Human Behaviour.
[30] Prakhar Gupta,et al. Learning Word Vectors for 157 Languages , 2018, LREC.
[31] Tomas Mikolov,et al. Advances in Pre-Training Distributed Word Representations , 2017, LREC.
[32] Per B. Brockhoff,et al. lmerTest Package: Tests in Linear Mixed Effects Models , 2017 .
[33] Matthew W. Crocker,et al. A Neurocomputational Model of the N400 and the P600 in Language Processing , 2016, Cognitive science.
[34] Steven G. Luke,et al. Limits on lexical prediction during reading , 2016, Cognitive Psychology.
[35] Walter Daelemans,et al. Evaluating Unsupervised Dutch Word Embeddings as a Linguistic Resource , 2016, LREC.
[36] Rolf A. Zwaan. Situation models, mental simulations, and abstract concepts in discourse comprehension , 2015, Psychonomic bulletin & review.
[37] Allyson Ettinger,et al. Modeling N400 amplitude using vector space models of word representation , 2016, CogSci.
[38] S. Frank,et al. The ERP response to the amount of information conveyed by words in sentences , 2015, Brain and Language.
[39] G. Kuperberg,et al. Reversing expectations during discourse comprehension , 2015, Language, cognition and neuroscience.
[40] Marta Kutas,et al. Pre-Processing in Sentence Comprehension: Sensitivity to Likely Upcoming Meaning and Structure , 2014, Lang. Linguistics Compass.
[41] Jeffrey Pennington,et al. GloVe: Global Vectors for Word Representation , 2014, EMNLP.
[42] D. Bates,et al. Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.
[43] Rolf A. Zwaan. Embodiment and language comprehension: reframing the discussion , 2014, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
[44] Viviane Deprez,et al. Action relevance in linguistic context drives word-induced motor activity , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[45] R Core Team,et al. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .
[46] C. Van Petten,et al. Examining the N400 semantic context effect item-by-item: relationship to corpus-based measures of word co-occurrence. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[47] Kerstin Fischer,et al. Beyond the sentence , 2013 .
[48] Jeffrey Dean,et al. Distributed Representations of Words and Phrases and their Compositionality , 2013, NIPS.
[49] Ellen F. Lau,et al. Dissociating N400 Effects of Prediction from Association in Single-word Contexts , 2013, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[50] Nelleke Oostdijk,et al. The Construction of a 500-Million-Word Reference Corpus of Contemporary Written Dutch , 2013, Essential Speech and Language Technology for Dutch.
[51] Roland Schäfer,et al. Building Large Corpora from the Web Using a New Efficient Tool Chain , 2012, LREC.
[52] J. Elman,et al. Generalized event knowledge activation during online sentence comprehension. , 2012, Journal of memory and language.
[53] C. Van Petten,et al. Prediction during language comprehension: benefits, costs, and ERP components. , 2012, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.
[54] Mark Johnson,et al. Using Language Models and Latent Semantic Analysis to Characterise the N400m Neural Response , 2011, ALTA.
[55] Walter Kintsch,et al. The Construction of Meaning , 2011, Top. Cogn. Sci..
[56] A. D. Groot. Language and Cognition in Bilinguals and Multilinguals: An Introduction , 2010 .
[57] J. Elman,et al. Effects of event knowledge in processing verbal arguments. , 2010, Journal of memory and language.
[58] Marta Kutas,et al. CHAPTER 15 A Look around at What Lies Ahead: Prediction and Predictability in Language Processing , 2010 .
[59] Peter Hagoort,et al. When Elephants Fly: Differential Sensitivity of Right and Left Inferior Frontal Gyri to Discourse and World Knowledge , 2009, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[60] Fred L. Drake,et al. Python 3 Reference Manual , 2009 .
[61] Patrick F. Reidy. An Introduction to Latent Semantic Analysis , 2009 .
[62] Hartmut Leuthold,et al. Eye-movements and ERPs reveal the time course of processing negation and remitting counterfactual worlds , 2008, Brain Research.
[63] Hartmut Leuthold,et al. Processing local pragmatic anomalies in fictional contexts: evidence from the N400. , 2008, Psychophysiology.
[64] Keith Rayner,et al. Effects of context on eye movements when reading about possible and impossible events. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[65] Heather J. Ferguson,et al. Anomalies in real and counterfactual worlds : An eye-movement investigation , 2008 .
[66] R. Levy. Expectation-based syntactic comprehension , 2008, Cognition.
[67] Anette Rosenbach,et al. Animacy and grammatical variation—Findings from English genitive variation , 2008 .
[68] Peter Hagoort,et al. Beyond the sentence given , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.
[69] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. Establishing reference in language comprehension: An electrophysiological perspective , 2007, Brain Research.
[70] Mante S. Nieuwland,et al. When Peanuts Fall in Love: N400 Evidence for the Power of Discourse , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[71] H. Kolk,et al. Accessing world knowledge: evidence from N400 and reaction time priming. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.
[72] Walter Kintsch,et al. An Overview of Top-Down and Bottom-Up Effects in Comprehension: The CI Perspective , 2005 .
[73] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Updating situation models. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[74] Walter Kintsch,et al. Text Comprehension and Discourse Processing , 2003 .
[75] Y. Benjamini,et al. THE CONTROL OF THE FALSE DISCOVERY RATE IN MULTIPLE TESTING UNDER DEPENDENCY , 2001 .
[76] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Retrieval from temporally organized situation models. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.
[77] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Situation models in language comprehension and memory. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.
[78] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. Discourse comprehension. , 1997, Annual review of psychology.
[79] Rolf A. Zwaan,et al. The Construction of Situation Models in Narrative Comprehension: An Event-Indexing Model , 1995 .
[80] Arthur C. Graesser,et al. Dimensions of situation model construction in narrative comprehension. , 1995 .
[81] M. Kutas. In the company of other words: Electrophysiological evidence for single-word and sentence context effects , 1993 .
[82] M. Kutas,et al. An Electrophysiological Probe of Incidental Semantic Association , 1989, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.
[83] P. Holcomb. Automatic and attentional processing: An event-related brain potential analysis of semantic priming , 1988, Brain and Language.
[84] S. T. Dumais,et al. Using latent semantic analysis to improve access to textual information , 1988, CHI '88.
[85] W. Kintsch. The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: a construction-integration model. , 1988, Psychological review.
[86] Marta Kutas,et al. Tracking the Time Course of Meaning Activation , 1988 .
[87] M. Rugg. The effects of semantic priming and work repetition on event-related potentials. , 1985, Psychophysiology.
[88] C. C. Wood,et al. Event-related potentials, lexical decision and semantic priming. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.
[89] M. Kutas,et al. Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.
[90] W. Kintsch,et al. Strategies of discourse comprehension , 1983 .
[91] P. Johnson-Laird,et al. Mental Models: Towards a Cognitive Science of Language, Inference, and Consciousness , 1985 .
[92] A. Garnham. Mental models as representations of text , 1981, Memory & cognition.
[93] Philip N. Johnson-Laird,et al. Mental Models in Cognitive Science , 1980, Cogn. Sci..
[94] I. Fischler,et al. Automatic and attentional processes in the effects of sentence contexts on word recognition , 1979 .
[95] Walter Kintsch,et al. Toward a model of text comprehension and production. , 1978 .
[96] J. Bransford,et al. Sentence memory: A constructive versus interpretive approach ☆ ☆☆ , 1972 .