Correlation between index electrocardiographic patterns and pre‐intervention angiographic findings: Insights from the HORIZONS‐AMI trial

Objectives: To improve ECG interpretation accuracy in patients with chest pain prior to activation of the cardiac catheterization laboratory for primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI). Background: Despite current guideline‐based ECG criteria, challenges remain in optimizing the rate of appropriate catheterization laboratory activation. Methods: The HORIZONS‐AMI trial enrolled 3,602 patients with chest pain consistent with myocardial infarction (MI). ECG and angiographic core laboratory databases were analyzed for correlation between the qualifying study ECG and the baseline coronary angiogram. Results: LAD occlusion manifested in >80% of cases as ST‐segment elevation in leads V2 and V3, while the culprit vessel was the RCA and LCx in 75 and 25% of cases, respectively, for inferior MI ECG patterns. The study threshold of ≥1.0 mm ST‐segment elevation in ≥2 contiguous ECG leads was not met in 189 (5.3%) patients. When stratified by culprit artery, the prevalence of reciprocal ST‐segment depression ranged from 24 to 88%, being least common for lesions in the mid‐ and distal left anterior descending artery. Despite study eligibility, no posterior MIs were enrolled. Only 36 LBBB cases were identified (25% of whom did not undergo PCI), and 5 of 11 left main coronary occlusions (45%) had ST‐segment elevation in lead aVR. Conclusions: The present study confirms prior ischemic ECG findings predicted by vectorcardiography, validates certain ECG patterns as reliable surrogate markers for acute coronary occlusion, and provides novel insights correlating index ECG ischemic changes and pre‐intervention coronary angiography. These results may enhance the rate of appropriate catheterization laboratory activation. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

[1]  B. Gersh,et al.  Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarction. , 2011, The American journal of cardiology.

[2]  J. Ornato,et al.  Outcomes in patients with chronicity of left bundle-branch block with possible acute myocardial infarction. , 2011, American heart journal.

[3]  Gregg W Stone,et al.  Appropriate cardiac cath lab activation: optimizing electrocardiogram interpretation and clinical decision-making for acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction. , 2010, American heart journal.

[4]  E. Antman,et al.  Angiographic and clinical outcomes among patients with acute coronary syndromes presenting with isolated anterior ST-segment depression: a TRITON-TIMI 38 (Trial to Assess Improvement in Therapeutic Outcomes by Optimizing Platelet Inhibition With Prasugrel-Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction 38) su , 2010, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[5]  O. Pahlm,et al.  Electrocardiographic classification of acute coronary syndromes: a review by a committee of the International Society for Holter and Non-Invasive Electrocardiology. , 2010, Journal of electrocardiology.

[6]  E. W. Hancock,et al.  AHA/ACCF/HRS recommendations for the standardization and interpretation of the electrocardiogram: part VI: acute ischemia/infarction: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Electrocardiography and Arrhythmias Committee, Council on Clinical Cardiology; the American College of Card , 2009, Circulation.

[7]  Michael Weis,et al.  Management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation: the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the European Society of Cardiology. , 2008, European heart journal.

[8]  B. Gersh,et al.  Bivalirudin during primary PCI in acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[9]  H. Krumholz,et al.  A campaign to improve the timeliness of primary percutaneous coronary intervention: Door-to-Balloon: An Alliance for Quality. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.

[10]  E. Antman,et al.  Prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes. , 2007, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  E. Antman,et al.  Development of Systems of Care for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Patients , 2007 .

[12]  Stephen W. Smith ST segment elevation differs depending on the method of measurement. , 2006, Academic emergency medicine : official journal of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine.

[13]  G. Lamas,et al.  ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction--executive summary. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to revise the 1999 guidelines for the management of patients wi , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[14]  Mark E Josephson,et al.  Use of the electrocardiogram in acute myocardial infarction. , 2003, The New England journal of medicine.

[15]  F. Neumann,et al.  Diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in angiographically documented occluded infarct vessel : limitations of ST-segment elevation in standard and extended ECG leads. , 2001, Chest.

[16]  I. Menown,et al.  Optimizing the initial 12-lead electrocardiographic diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, European heart journal.

[17]  W R Dassen,et al.  Value of the electrocardiogram in localizing the occlusion site in the left anterior descending coronary artery in acute anterior myocardial infarction. , 1999, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  G S Wagner,et al.  Electrocardiographic diagnosis of evolving acute myocardial infarction in the presence of left bundle-branch block. GUSTO-1 (Global Utilization of Streptokinase and Tissue Plasminogen Activator for Occluded Coronary Arteries) Investigators. , 1996, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  W. Brady,et al.  Reciprocal ST segment depression: impact on the electrocardiographic diagnosis of ST segment elevation acute myocardial infarction. , 2002, The American journal of emergency medicine.