Life cycle assessment of alternative technologies for municipal solid waste and plastic solid waste management in the Greater London area

Abstract The aim of this study is to present the results of a life cycle assessment performed for different scenarios reflecting the management, treatment and handling of plastic solid waste as a fraction of municipal solid waste (MSW) in the Greater London area. The study is divided in two parts: Part I comprises a LCA on the current MSW management strategy adopted in the Greater London area. This includes a materials recovery route via a dry Materials Recovery Facility (MRF) and an energy recovery route (incineration unit (IU) with combined heat and power). Part II investigates two alternative thermo-chemical treatment (TCT) technologies for the management of plastic solid waste (PSW): a low temperature pyrolysis (LTP) reactor and a hydrogenation reactor (VCC). The LTP process recovers valuable chemicals and petrochemicals (e.g., gases (C 3 –C 4 ), liquid fractions (naphtha), waxes (atmospheric residue, AR) and heat in the form of steam), whilst the hydrogenation process produces syncrude and e-gas which is comparable to natural gas. The system expansion methodology was applied to the scenarios developed. A sensitivity analysis investigated different degrees of material recovery and reprocessing for the substitution of the relevant conventional processes. At the same time the study tackled the impact on the environment of introducing TCT units with the aim of petrochemicals’ recovery. Results showed that the current waste management system is more environmentally friendly compared with the landfill scenario for all the impact categories investigated. Moreover, the employment of the alternative TCT technologies investigated depends on the market’s ability to take-in the petrochemical by-products hence replacing their conventional production. Scenarios including pyrolysis appeared to be more environmentally friendly in terms of Greenhouse gas emissions when compared with hydrocracking, while the reverse was true for the eutrophication potential category.

[1]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[2]  Monia Niero,et al.  Review of LCA studies of solid waste management systems--part II: methodological guidance for a better practice. , 2014, Waste management.

[3]  Reinout Heijungs,et al.  Allocation and 'what-if' scenarios in life cycle assessment of waste management systems. , 2007, Waste management.

[4]  Silvia Bargigli,et al.  Life cycle assessment (LCA) of waste management strategies: Landfilling, sorting plant and incineration , 2009 .

[5]  J la Cour Jansen,et al.  A life cycle approach to the management of household food waste - A Swedish full-scale case study. , 2011, Waste management.

[6]  Shabbir H. Gheewala,et al.  Framework for life cycle sustainability assessment of municipal solid waste management systems with an application to a case study in Thailand , 2012, Waste management & research : the journal of the International Solid Wastes and Public Cleansing Association, ISWA.

[7]  Jerry D. Murphy,et al.  Technical, economic and environmental analysis of energy production from municipal solid waste , 2004 .

[8]  Anna Björklund,et al.  Life cycle assessment of fuels for district heating: A comparison of waste incineration, biomass- and natural gas combustion , 2007 .

[9]  R. Heijungs,et al.  Life cycle assessment An operational guide to the ISO standards , 2001 .

[10]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Methodological aspects of life cycle assessment of integrated solid waste management systems , 1999 .

[11]  T. Haukohl J. Marxen U. Rand,et al.  Municipal Solid Waste Incineration: Requirements for a Successful Project , 2000 .

[12]  Florian Wagner,et al.  Chemical recycling of plastic wastes , 2012 .

[13]  Stefan Bringezu,et al.  Environmental Implications and Costs of Municipal Solid Waste‐Derived Ethylene , 2013 .

[14]  G N Demirer,et al.  Life cycle assessment of municipal solid waste management methods: Ankara case study. , 2006, Environment international.

[15]  Maria Laura Mastellone,et al.  A life cycle assessment of mechanical and feedstock recycling options for management of plastic packaging wastes , 2005 .

[16]  Shiva Habibi,et al.  Environmental implications of municipal solid waste-derived ethanol. , 2007, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Karl R. Haapala,et al.  Environmental impact and cost assessment of incineration and ethanol production as municipal solid waste management strategies , 2013, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[18]  Roland Clift,et al.  The application of Life Cycle Assessment to Integrated Solid Waste Management - Part 1 - Methodology , 2000 .

[19]  Paul T. Williams,et al.  The pyrolysis of individual plastics and a plastic mixture in a fixed bed reactor , 1997 .

[20]  Göran Finnveden,et al.  Allocation in ISO 14041—a critical review , 2001 .

[21]  R. Clift,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy from waste via anaerobic digestion: a UK case study. , 2014, Waste management.

[22]  Paola Lettieri,et al.  Techno-economic performance of energy-from-waste fluidized bed combustion and gasification processes in the UK context , 2009 .