Structural Features Determining Flower-Promoting Activity of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T[W][OPEN]

FT, also known as florigen, activates flowering, while the closely related TFL1 represses flowering. By mutating most FT residues, the authors identified a comprehensive set of mutations that convert FT into a TFL1 mimic. These mutations are all predicted to change the surface charge, pointing to important differences in FT and TFL1 interactions with other proteins. In Arabidopsis thaliana, the genes FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) and TERMINAL FLOWER1 (TFL1) have antagonistic roles in regulating the onset of flowering: FT activates and TFL1 represses flowering. Both encode small, closely related transcription cofactors of ∼175 amino acids. Previous studies identified a potential ligand binding residue as well as a divergent external loop as critical for the differences in activity of FT and TFL1, but the mechanisms for the differential action of FT and TFL1 remain unclear. Here, we took an unbiased approach to probe the importance of residues throughout FT protein, testing the effects of hundreds of mutations in vivo. FT is surprisingly robust to a wide range of mutations, even in highly conserved residues. However, specific mutations in at least four different residues are sufficient to convert FT into a complete TFL1 mimic, even when expressed from TFL1 regulatory sequences. Modeling the effects of these mutations on the surface charge of FT protein suggests that the affected residues regulate the docking of an unknown ligand. These residues do not seem to alter the interaction with FD or 14-3-3 proteins, known FT interactors. Potential candidates for differential mediators of FT and TFL1 activities belong to the TCP (for TEOSINTE BRANCHED1, CYCLOIDEA, PCF) family of transcription factors.

[1]  S. Kay,et al.  BRANCHED1 Interacts with FLOWERING LOCUS T to Repress the Floral Transition of the Axillary Meristems in Arabidopsis[C][W][OA] , 2013, Plant Cell.

[2]  Katja E. Jaeger,et al.  Interlocking Feedback Loops Govern the Dynamic Behavior of the Floral Transition in Arabidopsis[W][OA] , 2013, Plant Cell.

[3]  O. Nilsson,et al.  Analysis of conifer FLOWERING LOCUS T/TERMINAL FLOWER1-like genes provides evidence for dramatic biochemical evolution in the angiosperm FT lineage. , 2012, The New phytologist.

[4]  C. Fankhauser Faculty Opinions recommendation of Transcription factor PIF4 controls the thermosensory activation of flowering. , 2012 .

[5]  M. Cadene,et al.  Ligand Binding Study of Human PEBP1/RKIP: Interaction with Nucleotides and Raf-1 Peptides Evidenced by NMR and Mass Spectrometry , 2012, PloS one.

[6]  Xingliang Hou,et al.  FTIP1 Is an Essential Regulator Required for Florigen Transport , 2012, PLoS biology.

[7]  K. Goto,et al.  Arabidopsis TERMINAL FLOWER1 Is Involved in the Regulation of Flowering Time and Inflorescence Development through Transcriptional Repression[C][W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[8]  Shojiro Tamaki,et al.  14-3-3 proteins act as intracellular receptors for rice Hd3a florigen , 2011, Nature.

[9]  S. Moriya,et al.  Apple FLOWERING LOCUS T proteins interact with transcription factors implicated in cell growth and organ development. , 2011, Tree physiology.

[10]  D. Weigel,et al.  Negative Regulation of Anthocyanin Biosynthesis in Arabidopsis by a miR156-Targeted SPL Transcription Factor[W][OA] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[11]  Claire L. Knowles,et al.  The Pea GIGAS Gene Is a FLOWERING LOCUS T Homolog Necessary for Graft-Transmissible Specification of Flowering but Not for Responsiveness to Photoperiod[C][W] , 2011, Plant Cell.

[12]  D. Weigel,et al.  Comparative analysis of non-autonomous effects of tasiRNAs and miRNAs in Arabidopsis thaliana , 2010, Nucleic acids research.

[13]  O. Nilsson,et al.  An Antagonistic Pair of FT Homologs Mediates the Control of Flowering Time in Sugar Beet , 2010, Science.

[14]  K. Shinozaki,et al.  TCP Transcription Factors Regulate the Activities of ASYMMETRIC LEAVES1 and miR164, as Well as the Auxin Response, during Differentiation of Leaves in Arabidopsis[C][W] , 2010, Plant Cell.

[15]  Elliot M. Meyerowitz,et al.  Orchestration of Floral Initiation by APETALA1 , 2010, Science.

[16]  Javier F. Palatnik,et al.  Identification of MicroRNA Processing Determinants by Random Mutagenesis of Arabidopsis MIR172a Precursor , 2010, Current Biology.

[17]  G. Coupland,et al.  Genetic and spatial interactions between FT, TSF and SVP during the early stages of floral induction in Arabidopsis. , 2009, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[18]  M. Mori,et al.  Long-distance, graft-transmissible action of Arabidopsis FLOWERING LOCUS T protein to promote flowering. , 2008, Plant & cell physiology.

[19]  Javier F. Palatnik,et al.  Control of Jasmonate Biosynthesis and Senescence by miR319 Targets , 2008, PLoS biology.

[20]  E. Blum,et al.  A Protracted and Dynamic Maturation Schedule Underlies Arabidopsis Leaf Development[W] , 2008, The Plant Cell Online.

[21]  F. Turck,et al.  Regulation and identity of florigen: FLOWERING LOCUS T moves center stage. , 2008, Annual review of plant biology.

[22]  N. Raikhel,et al.  The shoot meristem identity gene TFL1 is involved in flower development and trafficking to the protein storage vacuole , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  D. Weigel,et al.  Move on up, it's time for change--mobile signals controlling photoperiod-dependent flowering. , 2007, Genes & development.

[24]  S. Siddique,et al.  An Improved pPZP Vector for Agrobacterium-mediated Plant Transformation , 2007, Plant Molecular Biology Reporter.

[25]  J. Mathieu,et al.  Export of FT Protein from Phloem Companion Cells Is Sufficient for Floral Induction in Arabidopsis , 2007, Current Biology.

[26]  Katja E. Jaeger,et al.  FT Protein Acts as a Long-Range Signal in Arabidopsis , 2007, Current Biology.

[27]  Shoichi Matsuo,et al.  Hd3a Protein Is a Mobile Flowering Signal in Rice , 2007, Science.

[28]  Fabio Fornara,et al.  FT Protein Movement Contributes to Long-Distance Signaling in Floral Induction of Arabidopsis , 2007, Science.

[29]  W. J. Lucas,et al.  FLOWERING LOCUS T Protein May Act as the Long-Distance Florigenic Signal in the Cucurbits[W] , 2007, The Plant Cell Online.

[30]  Y. Eshed,et al.  The tomato FT ortholog triggers systemic signals that regulate growth and flowering and substitute for diverse environmental stimuli. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[31]  Stefan R. Henz,et al.  A divergent external loop confers antagonistic activity on floral regulators FT and TFL1 , 2006, The EMBO journal.

[32]  Joonki Kim,et al.  CONSTANS Activates SUPPRESSOR OF OVEREXPRESSION OF CONSTANS 1 through FLOWERING LOCUS T to Promote Flowering in Arabidopsis1[w] , 2005, Plant Physiology.

[33]  K. Goto,et al.  FD, a bZIP Protein Mediating Signals from the Floral Pathway Integrator FT at the Shoot Apex , 2005, Science.

[34]  Wolfgang Busch,et al.  Integration of Spatial and Temporal Information During Floral Induction in Arabidopsis , 2005, Science.

[35]  Tracy Money,et al.  A single amino acid converts a repressor to an activator of flowering. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[36]  Koji Goto,et al.  TERMINAL FLOWER2, an Arabidopsis Homolog of HETEROCHROMATIN PROTEIN1, Counteracts the Activation of FLOWERING LOCUS T by CONSTANS in the Vascular Tissues of Leaves to Regulate Flowering Time Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.016 , 2003, The Plant Cell Online.

[37]  D. Baulcombe,et al.  An enhanced transient expression system in plants based on suppression of gene silencing by the p19 protein of tomato bushy stunt virus. , 2003, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[38]  Takashi Araki,et al.  Hd3a, a rice ortholog of the Arabidopsis FT gene, promotes transition to flowering downstream of Hd1 under short-day conditions. , 2002, Plant & cell physiology.

[39]  N. Adir,et al.  Tomato SP-Interacting Proteins Define a Conserved Signaling System That Regulates Shoot Architecture and Flowering Article, publication date, and citation information can be found at www.plantcell.org/cgi/doi/10.1105/tpc.010293. , 2001, The Plant Cell Online.

[40]  Nathan A. Baker,et al.  Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[41]  R. Tsien,et al.  Reducing the Environmental Sensitivity of Yellow Fluorescent Protein , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[42]  M. Banfield,et al.  The structure of Antirrhinum centroradialis protein (CEN) suggests a role as a kinase regulator. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  R. Hellens,et al.  pGreen: a versatile and flexible binary Ti vector for Agrobacterium-mediated plant transformation , 2000, Plant Molecular Biology.

[44]  J. Chory,et al.  Activation tagging of the floral inducer FT. , 1999, Science.

[45]  Y. Kobayashi,et al.  A pair of related genes with antagonistic roles in mediating flowering signals. , 1999, Science.

[46]  E. Coen,et al.  The TCP domain: a motif found in proteins regulating plant growth and development. , 1999, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[47]  W. Sakamoto,et al.  TERMINAL FLOWER 1-like genes in Brassica species , 1999 .

[48]  E. Truernit,et al.  Cell-to-Cell and Long-Distance Trafficking of the Green Fluorescent Protein in the Phloem and Symplastic Unloading of the Protein into Sink Tissues , 1999, Plant Cell.

[49]  S. Clough,et al.  Floral dip: a simplified method for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of Arabidopsis thaliana. , 1998, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[50]  M. Banfield,et al.  Function from structure? The crystal structure of human phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein suggests a role in membrane signal transduction. , 1998, Structure.

[51]  F. Schoentgen,et al.  Crystal structure of the phosphatidylethanolamine-binding protein from bovine brain: a novel structural class of phospholipid-binding proteins. , 1998, Structure.

[52]  M. Ganal,et al.  The SELF-PRUNING gene of tomato regulates vegetative to reproductive switching of sympodial meristems and is the ortholog of CEN and TFL1. , 1998, Development.

[53]  I Amaya,et al.  A common mechanism controls the life cycle and architecture of plants. , 1998, Development.

[54]  S. Kosugi,et al.  PCF1 and PCF2 specifically bind to cis elements in the rice proliferating cell nuclear antigen gene. , 1997, The Plant cell.

[55]  Y. Ogura,et al.  Cloning and molecular analysis of the Arabidopsis gene Terminal Flower 1 , 1997, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[56]  E. Coen,et al.  Inflorescence Commitment and Architecture in Arabidopsis , 1997, Science.

[57]  M. Koornneef,et al.  A genetic and physiological analysis of late flowering mutants in Arabidopsis thaliana , 1991, Molecular and General Genetics MGG.

[58]  S. Shannon,et al.  A Mutation in the Arabidopsis TFL1 Gene Affects Inflorescence Meristem Development. , 1991, The Plant cell.

[59]  S. Ho,et al.  Site-directed mutagenesis by overlap extension using the polymerase chain reaction. , 1989, Gene.

[60]  P. Cubas,et al.  TCP genes: a family snapshot ten years later. , 2010, Trends in plant science.

[61]  Tobias Dezulian,et al.  Sequence and expression differences underlie functional specialization of Arabidopsis microRNAs miR159 and miR319. , 2007, Developmental cell.

[62]  F. Nagy,et al.  Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter , 1985, Nature.