Service supply chain integration: the role of interpersonal relationships

The purpose of this paper is to explore the role of interpersonal relationships (IPRs) in service supply chain integration (SSCI) in terms of strategic alliance, information integration, and process integration.,The research employs an exploratory/investigational approach to multiple case studies and empirically investigates effects of IPRs in SSCI. The data were mainly collected through semi-structured interviews with senior management staff from four service companies and their suppliers or customers in New Zealand. Archival data from the Internet and company documentations were also applied.,The authors find that three dimensions of IPRs influence SSCI in different ways. The effect of IPRs on SSCI is indirect: personal affection acts as an initiator, and personal credibility works as a “gate-keeper” and strengthens the confidence of interactive partners, while personal communication, a facilitator, plays a more important role in SSCI than personal affection and credibility.,The research provides managers in service supply chains the awareness of the importance of IPRs, as well as the characteristics of IPRs, in order to best utilize available resources. Managers should synergize all three dimensions of IPRs’ resources: make efforts to cultivate personal affection to avoid the instinctive isolation modern technology brings; attempt to accumulate positive personal credibility profiles; focus more on the role of personal communication and retain physical contact in SSCI processes.,This study contributes to SSCI literature by extending from the inter-organizational relationships (IORs) to interpersonal level relationships to explore the inner influence mechanism. Also, it explores the role of IPRs on all three dimensions of SSCI simultaneously rather than individual dimensions independently. Finally, it contributes to resource orchestration theory (ROT) by synthesizing three dimensions of IPRs resources, and IORs resources in order to achieve capabilities of SSCI. The study develops the individual-level research in supply chain integration (SCI) to a further depth.

[1]  Chad W. Autry,et al.  The Role of Personal Relationships in Facilitating Supply Chain Communications: A Qualitative Study , 2012 .

[2]  L. Bengtsson,et al.  The Interorganizational Learning Dilemma: Collective Knowledge Development in Strategic Alliances , 1998 .

[3]  Augustine A. Lado,et al.  Inter‐organizational communication as a relational competency: Antecedents and performance outcomes in collaborative buyer–supplier relationships , 2008 .

[4]  Chee Yew Wong,et al.  Service supply chain management process capabilities: Measurement development , 2017 .

[5]  M. Gibbert,et al.  What passes as a rigorous case study , 2008 .

[6]  S. Freeman,et al.  The development of subsidiary roles in the motor vehicle manufacturing industry , 2012 .

[7]  Yuan Li,et al.  The impact of organizational culture on supply chain integration: a contingency and configuration approach , 2015 .

[8]  Jan Olhager,et al.  Supply chain integration and performance: The effects of long-term relationships, information technology and sharing, and logistics integration , 2012 .

[9]  Baofeng Huo.  The impact of supply chain integration on company performance: an organizational capability perspective , 2012 .

[10]  J. Barney.  Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage , 1991 .

[11]  Cultivating Guanxi as a foreign investor strategy , 2000 .

[12]  R. Handfield,et al.  Creating supply chain relational capital: The impact of formal and informal socialization processes , 2006 .

[13]  A. Strauss,et al.  Basics of Qualitative Research , 1992 .

[14]  Sari Uusipaavalniemi,et al.  Information integration in maintenance services , 2008 .

[15]  D. Towill,et al.  A comparative study of manufacturing and service sector supply chain integration via the uncertainty circle model , 2016 .

[16]  Y. Lun,et al.  The role of customer integration in extended producer responsibility: A study of Chinese export manufacturers , 2014 .

[17]  Scott E. Sampson,et al.  Customer Roles in Service Supply Chains and Opportunities for Innovation , 2012 .

[18]  Don Y. Lee,et al.  Guanxi, Trust, and Long-Term Orientation in Chinese Business Markets , 2005 .

[19]  Per Vagn Freytag,et al.  Service supply chain management: A survey of lean application in the municipal sector , 2011 .

[20]  David G. Sirmon,et al.  Managing Firm Resources in Dynamic Environments to Create Value: Looking Inside the Black Box , 2007 .

[21]  Jean Hartley,et al.  Case study research , 2004 .

[22]  R. Narasimhan,et al.  The antecedent role of quality, information sharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance , 2005 .

[23]  R. Handfield,et al.  Supplier integration into new product development: coordinating product, process and supply chain design , 2005 .

[24]  Eric Deakins,et al.  Supply chain integration: an international comparison of maturity , 2011 .

[25]  Terrill L. Frantz,et al.  Communication Networks from the Enron Email Corpus “It's Always About the People. Enron is no Different” , 2005, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[26]  R. Duane Ireland,et al.  Resource Orchestration to Create Competitive Advantage , 2010 .

[27]  J. Vilko,et al.  The development of a service supply chain model for a manufacturing SME , 2015 .

[28]  Shaohan Cai,et al.  The Effects of Boundary Spanners’ Personal Relationships on Interfirm Collaboration and Conflict: A Study of the Role of Guanxi in China , 2017 .

[29]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[30]  M. Patton.  Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[31]  Mark Pagell,et al.  Understanding the factors that enable and inhibit the integration of operations, purchasing and logistics , 2004 .

[32]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Processes, episodes and events in health service supply chains , 2011 .

[33]  Richard E. Lucas,et al.  Personality, culture, and subjective well-being: emotional and cognitive evaluations of life. , 2003, Annual review of psychology.

[34]  Anu Bask,et al.  The concept of modularity: diffusion from manufacturing to service production , 2010 .

[35]  Roger Maull,et al.  Service Supply Chains: A Customer Perspective , 2012 .

[36]  David J. Ketchen,et al.  Resource gaps and resource orchestration shortfalls in supply chain management: : the case of product recalls , 2014 .

[37]  Leonidas C. Leonidou,et al.  Interpersonal Factors as Drivers of Quality and Performance in Western–Hong Kong Interorganizational Business Relationships , 2015 .

[38]  Ricky Y. K. Chan,et al.  The roles of xinyong and guanxi in Chinese relationship marketing , 2005 .

[39]  G. Stevens,et al.  Integrating the Supply Chain … 25 years on , 2016 .

[40]  K. Ashcraft.  Feminist-Bureaucratic Control and Other Adversarial Allies: Extending Organized Dissonance to the Practice of “New” Forms , 2006 .

[41]  T. Baltacıoğlu,et al.  A New Framework for Service Supply Chains , 2007 .

[42]  Hefu Liu,et al.  The configuration between supply chain integration and information technology competency: A resource orchestration perspective , 2016 .

[43]  M. C. Holcomb,et al.  The role of personal relationships in supply chains , 2013 .

[44]  Brian S. Fugate,et al.  SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT COORDINATION MECHANISMS , 2006 .

[45]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[46]  A. Huberman,et al.  Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook , 1994 .

[47]  Carl Marcus Wallenburg,et al.  The human factor in SCM: Introducing a meta-theory of behavioral supply chain management , 2017 .

[48]  Christian F. Durach,et al.  Mapping the Landscape of Future Research Themes in Supply Chain Management , 2016 .

[49]  Min Zhang,et al.  Innovating through services, co-creation and supplier integration: Cases from China , 2016 .

[50]  Yaozhong Wu,et al.  Social Preferences and Supply Chain Performance: An Experimental Study , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[51]  Baofeng Huo,et al.  The impact of internal integration and relationship commitment on external integration , 2011 .

[52]  Kai Xu,et al.  Resource based theory in operations management research , 2016 .

[53]  Kostas Selviaridis,et al.  Performance-based contracting in service supply chains: a service provider risk perspective , 2014 .

[54]  P. Ring,et al.  Developmental Processes of Cooperative Interorganizational Relationships , 1994 .

[55]  Baofeng Huo,et al.  Enablers of supply chain integration: Interpersonal and interorganizational relationship perspectives , 2016, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[56]  Baofeng Huo,et al.  The effect of high-involvement human resource management practices on supply chain integration , 2015 .

[57]  Paul L. Hartman,et al.  Likeability and its effect on outcomes of interpersonal interaction , 2017 .

[58]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .