Comparing the Impact of Course-Based and Apprentice-Based Research Experiences in a Life Science Laboratory Curriculum

This four-year study describes the assessment of a bifurcated laboratory curriculum designed to provide upper-division undergraduate majors in two life science departments meaningful exposure to authentic research. The timing is critical as it provides a pathway for both directly admitted and transfer students to enter research. To fulfill their degree requirements, all majors complete one of two paths in the laboratory program. One path immerses students in scientific discovery experienced through team research projects (course-based undergraduate research experiences, or CUREs) and the other path through a mentored, independent research project (apprentice-based research experiences, or AREs). The bifurcated laboratory curriculum was structured using backwards design to help all students, irrespective of path, achieve specific learning outcomes. Over 1,000 undergraduates enrolled in the curriculum. Self-report survey results indicate that there were no significant differences in affective gains by path. Students conveyed which aspects of the curriculum were critical to their learning and development of research-oriented skills. Students' interests in biology increased upon completion of the curriculum, inspiring a subset of CURE participants to subsequently pursue further research. A rubric-guided performance evaluation, employed to directly measure learning, revealed differences in learning gains for CURE versus ARE participants, with evidence suggesting a CURE can reduce the achievement gap between high-performing students and their peers.

[1]  Gülnur Birol,et al.  The Colorado Learning Attitudes about Science Survey (CLASS) for Use in Biology , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[2]  Nancy Kober,et al.  Reaching Students: What Research Says about Effective Instruction in Undergraduate Science and Engineering. , 2015 .

[3]  M. Patton.  Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods: Integrating Theory and Practice , 2014 .

[4]  K. Perreault,et al.  Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches , 2011 .

[5]  Irina Makarevitch,et al.  Authentic Research Experience and “Big Data” Analysis in the Classroom: Maize Response to Abiotic Stress , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[6]  Thomas M. Smith,et al.  The Condition of education , 1975 .

[7]  Deborah Jacobs-Sera,et al.  Exploring the Mycobacteriophage Metaproteome: Phage Genomics as an Educational Platform , 2006, PLoS genetics.

[8]  Deborah Allen,et al.  Rubrics: tools for making learning goals and evaluation criteria explicit for both teachers and learners. , 2006, CBE life sciences education.

[9]  David Lopatto,et al.  Classroom-Based Science Research at the Introductory Level: Changes in Career Choices and Attitude , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[10]  Christopher Bergevin,et al.  Towards Improving the Integration of Undergraduate Biology and Mathematics Education , 2010, Journal of microbiology & biology education.

[11]  Alison Crowe,et al.  Biology in bloom: implementing Bloom's Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[12]  C. Wei,et al.  Undergraduate Research Experiences in Biology: Alternatives to the Apprenticeship Model , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[13]  Jennifer Roecklein-Canfield,et al.  Genomics Education Partnership: a research-based approach to undergraduate teaching utilizing a centralized support system (618.39) , 2014 .

[14]  Xianglei Chen.  STEM Attrition: College Students' Paths into and out of STEM Fields. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2014-001. , 2013 .

[15]  Jo Handelsman,et al.  Increasing Persistence of College Students in STEM , 2013, Science.

[16]  Gwen Lawrie,et al.  Is the undergraduate research experience (URE) always best?: The power of choice in a bifurcated practical stream for a large introductory biochemistry class , 2012 .

[17]  Pratibha Varma-Nelson,et al.  Assessment of Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: A Meeting Report , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[18]  Debra L. Linton,et al.  Is Peer Interaction Necessary for Optimal Active Learning? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[19]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences Can Make Scientific Research More Inclusive , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[20]  G Wiggins,et al.  Understanding by design (expanded 2nd ed. , 2005 .

[21]  J. M. Cortina,et al.  What Is Coefficient Alpha? An Examination of Theory and Applications , 1993 .

[22]  E. Seymour,et al.  Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three‐year study , 2004 .

[23]  Jeremy Buhler,et al.  The Genomics Education Partnership: Successful Integration of Research into Laboratory Classes at a Diverse Group of Undergraduate Institutions , 2010, CBE life sciences education.

[24]  Kristen R. Miller,et al.  Redefining Authentic Research Experiences in Introductory Biology Laboratories and Barriers to Their Implementation , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[25]  George D. Kuh.  High-Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter , 2008 .

[26]  C. Kerfeld,et al.  Incorporating Genomics and Bioinformatics across the Life Sciences Curriculum , 2010, PLoS biology.

[27]  David Lopatto,et al.  Undergraduate research experiences support science career decisions and active learning. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[28]  E. Guba,et al.  The Constructivist Credo , 2013, QMiP Bulletin.

[29]  Anne-Barrie Hunter,et al.  Becoming a scientist: The role of undergraduate research in students' cognitive, personal, and professional development , 2007 .

[30]  Jose Maria Cortina.  What is coefficient alpha , 1993 .

[31]  Benjamin S. Bloom,et al.  A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives , 2000 .

[32]  K. Krauter,et al.  Combining Peer Discussion with Instructor Explanation Increases Student Learning from In-Class Concept Questions , 2011, CBE life sciences education.

[33]  T. Hall.  Ethnography: Principles in Practice. By M. Hammersley & P. Atkinson. Pp. 323. (Routledge, London, 1995.) , 1997, Journal of Biosocial Science.

[34]  Susan H. Russell,et al.  Benefits of Undergraduate Research Experiences , 2007, Science.

[35]  M. Levis-Fitzgerald,et al.  Increasing Persistence in Undergraduate Science Majors: A Model for Institutional Support of Underrepresented Students , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[36]  Heather Thiry,et al.  The Role of Student-Advisor Interactions in Apprenticing Undergraduate Researchers into a Scientific Community of Practice , 2011 .

[37]  Erin L. Dolan,et al.  Modeling Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experiences: An Agenda for Future Research and Evaluation , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[38]  B. Thompson.  Exploratory and Confirmatory Factor Analysis: Understanding Concepts and Applications , 2004 .

[39]  Jeremy Buhler,et al.  A Course-Based Research Experience: How Benefits Change with Increased Investment in Instructional Time , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[40]  Engaging Students and Evaluating Learning Progress using Collaborative Exams in Introductory Courses , 2009 .

[41]  M. Villarejo,et al.  Importance of Undergraduate Research for Minority Persistence and Achievement in Biology , 2010 .

[42]  Steve Olson,et al.  Engage to Excel: Producing One Million Additional College Graduates with Degrees in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Report to the President. , 2012 .

[43]  Anya L. Goodman,et al.  A Central Support System Can Facilitate Implementation and Sustainability of a Classroom-Based Undergraduate Research Experience (CURE) in Genomics , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[44]  John Jonides,et al.  Undergraduate Student-Faculty Research Partnerships Affect Studen Retention , 1998 .

[45]  D. Wink,et al.  Inquiry-based and research-based laboratory pedagogies in undergraduate science. , 2008, Nature chemical biology.

[46]  D. Allen,et al.  Putting the horse back in front of the cart: using visions and decisions about high-quality learning experiences to drive course design. , 2007, CBE life sciences education.

[47]  Wei Li,et al.  A Broadly Implementable Research Course in Phage Discovery and Genomics for First-Year Undergraduate Students , 2014, mBio.

[48]  Christopher Beck,et al.  Promoting Inquiry-Based Teaching in Laboratory Courses: Are We Meeting the Grade? , 2014, CBE life sciences education.

[49]  W. Wood,et al.  Inquiry-based undergraduate teaching in the life sciences at large research universities: a perspective on the Boyer Commission Report. , 2003, Cell biology education.

[50]  M. J. Chang,et al.  Making a Difference in Science Education , 2013, American educational research journal.

[51]  Deborah Kogan,et al.  Encouraging minority undergraduates to choose science careers: career paths survey results. , 2008, CBE life sciences education.

[52]  L. Cronbach.  Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests , 1951 .

[53]  Sarah N. Gatson,et al.  Integrating research and education at research-extensive universities with research-intensive communities. , 2008, Advances in physiology education.

[54]  S. DiCarlo,et al.  Student retention of course content is improved by collaborative-group testing. , 2003, Advances in physiology education.

[55]  Sara E. Brownell,et al.  A High-Enrollment Course-Based Undergraduate Research Experience Improves Student Conceptions of Scientific Thinking and Ability to Interpret Data , 2015, CBE life sciences education.

[56]  Duncan David Nulty,et al.  The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: what can be done? , 2008 .