Optimum portfolio selection using a hybrid genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process

Purpose - – The purpose of this paper is to present a multi-objective model to the optimum portfolio selection using genetic algorithm and analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Portfolio selection is a multi-objective decision-making problem in financial management. Design/methodology/approach - – The proposed approach solves the problem in two stages. In the first stage, the portfolio selection problem is formulated as a zero-one mathematical programming model to optimize two objectives, namely, return and risk. A genetic algorithm (GA) with multiple fitness functions called as Multiple Fitness Functions Genetic Algorithm is applied to solve the formulated model. The proposed GA results in several non-dominated portfolios being in the Pareto (efficient) frontier. A decision-making approach based on AHP is then used in the second stage to select the portfolio from among the solutions obtained by GA which satisfies a decision-maker’s interests at most. Findings - – The proposed decision-making system enables an investor to find a portfolio which suits for his/her expectations at most. The main advantage of the proposed method is to provide prima-facie information about the optimal portfolios lying on the efficient frontier and thus helps investors to decide the appropriate investment alternatives. Originality/value - – The value of the paper is due to its comprehensiveness in which seven criteria are taken into account in the selection of a portfolio including return, risk, beta ratio, liquidity ratio, reward to variability ratio, Treynor’s ratio and Jensen’s alpha.

[1]  Jack L. Treynor How to Rate Management of Investment Funds , 2012 .

[2]  M. C. Jensen The Performance of Mutual Funds in the Period 1945-1964 , 1967 .

[3]  Patrick S. W. Fong,et al.  Final contractor selection using the analytical hierarchy process , 2000 .

[4]  F. Reilly,et al.  Investment Analysis and Portfolio Management , 1979 .

[5]  Kathrin Klamroth,et al.  An MCDM approach to portfolio optimization , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[6]  Shingo Mabu,et al.  A model of portfolio optimization using time adapting genetic network programming , 2010, Comput. Oper. Res..

[7]  A. Stuart,et al.  Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments , 1959 .

[8]  Jonathan Burton,et al.  An analytical hierarchy approach to facility layout , 1992 .

[9]  Hamid Reza Golmakani,et al.  Markowitz-based portfolio selection with minimum transaction lots, cardinality constraints and regarding sector capitalization using genetic algorithm , 2009, Expert Syst. Appl..

[10]  A Makui,et al.  A portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process: A case study of Iranian pharmaceutical industry , 2011 .

[11]  R. C. Merton,et al.  An Analytic Derivation of the Efficient Portfolio Frontier , 1972, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis.

[12]  Beyza Ahlatçioglu Ozkok,et al.  Fuzzy portfolio selection using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process , 2009, Inf. Sci..

[13]  Radhika Santhanam,et al.  Using the analytic hierarchy process for information system project selection , 1990, Inf. Manag..

[14]  T. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process , 1985 .

[15]  Yuping Wang,et al.  Multiobjective programming using uniform design and genetic algorithm , 2000, IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C.

[16]  Maghsud Solimanpur,et al.  A multi-objective genetic algorithm approach to the design of cellular manufacturing systems , 2004 .

[17]  Jaroslav Ramík,et al.  A MULTICRITERIA DECISION MAKING AT PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT , 2010 .

[18]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Developing aMulti Criteria Model for Stochastic IT Portfolio Selection by AHP Method , 2012 .

[19]  André F. Perold,et al.  Large-Scale Portfolio Optimization , 1984 .

[20]  R. Hill,et al.  Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process to Structure the Supplier Selection Procedure , 1992 .

[21]  Gülçin Büyüközkan,et al.  Using a multi-criteria decision making approach to evaluate mobile phone alternatives , 2007, Comput. Stand. Interfaces.

[22]  Richard Reed,et al.  Downside beta and the cross-sectional determinants of listed property trust returns , 2008 .