Integrating multicriteria evaluation and data visualization as a problem structuring approach to support territorial transformation projects

AbstractLarge freight or passenger transport projects are problematic and controversial because many financial, technical, environmental and social aspects need to be considered. Indeed, the interface between the transport project and territorial planning domains is generally the focus of considerable heated debates, which often develop into conflicting decision contexts characterized by a high level of complexity. This paper presents a possible response to these difficulties through an innovative approach that integrates the analytic network process and the interactive visualization tool. The approach is intended to be deployed as problem structuring method, with a view to creating a common language for the actors involved and a shared basis for generating fruitful discussions. The proposed approach was applied in the context of the German section of the Genoa–Rotterdam railway corridor within the Interreg IVB NWE Project “Code24”. The reported application shows how the combination of visualization and real-time interaction with spatial data provided effective decision support to a multinational stakeholder group. More generally, the application presented in this paper aims to demonstrate the potential of the approach for the selection of a transport improvement strategy within the content of territorial transformation.

[1]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[2]  Jon Coaffee,et al.  Planning Under Pressure – The Strategic Choice Approach (3rd ed.) , 2006 .

[3]  Elena Masala,et al.  The effects of decision-making on urban form: a tool for supporting planning processes , 2011, International Conference Virtual City and Territory (7è: 2011: Lisboa).

[4]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Towards a System of Systems Methodologies , 1984 .

[5]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Analytic Network Process and sustainable mobility: an application for the assessment of different scenarios , 2010 .

[6]  David Simmonds,et al.  The effect of urban quality improvements on economic activity. , 2006, Journal of environmental management.

[7]  Fred Toppen,et al.  Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development , 2013 .

[8]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Rethinking Soft OR interventions: Models as boundary objects , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[9]  Berna Haktanırlar Ulutaş,et al.  Determination of the appropriate energy policy for Turkey , 2005 .

[10]  Martin Dodge Information maps: tools for document exploration , 2005 .

[11]  Colin Eden,et al.  Tackling Strategic Problems: The Role of Group Decision Support , 1991 .

[12]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Problem structuring methods 'in the Dock': Arguing the case for Soft OR , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[13]  F. Abastante,et al.  A complex Analytic Network Process (ANP) network for analyzing Corridor24 alternative development strategies , 2012, CCCA12.

[14]  Sue Holwell,et al.  Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide , 2010 .

[15]  Umut Rifat Tuzkaya,et al.  A fuzzy analytic network process based approach to transportation-mode selection between Turkey and Germany: A case study , 2008, Inf. Sci..

[16]  K Ishii,et al.  Evaluation of remedial countermeasures using the analytic network process. , 2006, Waste management.

[17]  T. Saaty The Analytic Network Process , 2001 .

[18]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Scripts for group model building , 1997 .

[19]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  An Analytic Network Process Model for Financial-Crisis Forecasting , 2004 .

[20]  D. Andersen,et al.  Using Visual Representations as Boundary Objects to Resolve Conflict in Collaborative Model-Building Approaches , 2012 .

[21]  Colin Eden,et al.  Decision making in groups : theory and practice , 2010 .

[22]  David Banister,et al.  Transport, Climate Change and the City , 2014 .

[23]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Decision making with the analytic network process , 2013 .

[24]  Dean Tjosvold,et al.  Book review : Group model building : facilitating team learning using system dynamics , 1998 .

[25]  S. French Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach , 1988 .

[26]  R. Klosterman Planning Support Systems: A New Perspective on Computer-Aided Planning , 1997 .

[27]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Analytic Network Process, Interactive Maps and Strategic Assessment: The Evaluation of Corridor24 Alternative Development Strategies , 2014 .

[28]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[29]  Richard J. Ormerod,et al.  OR competences: the demands of problem structuring methods , 2014 .

[30]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[31]  Yiyang Fan,et al.  A Problem Structuring Method for Innovation Strategy: A Tentative DPSIR Approach , 2013 .

[32]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Improving the Generation of Decision Objectives , 2010, Decis. Anal..

[33]  Elena Masala,et al.  Interactive model of urban development in residential areas in Skopje , 2012 .

[34]  Francesca Abastante,et al.  An analytical model to evaluate a large scale urban design competition , 2013 .

[35]  T. Seager,et al.  Application of Multicriteria Decision Analysis in Environmental Decision Making , 2005, Integrated environmental assessment and management.

[36]  Shankar Chakraborty,et al.  Selection of non-traditional machining processes using analytic network process , 2011 .

[37]  Ralph L. Keeney,et al.  Generating Objectives: Can Decision Makers Articulate What They Want? , 2008, Manag. Sci..

[38]  J. Aczél,et al.  On the possible merging functions , 1989 .

[39]  Mongkut Piantanakulchai Analytic Network Process Model For Highway Corridor Planning , 2005 .

[40]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Supporting Planning Processes by the Use of Dynamic Visualisation , 2013 .

[41]  Elena Comino,et al.  Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process and the Analytic Network Process for the assessment of different wastewater treatment systems , 2011, Environ. Model. Softw..

[42]  Louis Anthony Cox,et al.  Wiley encyclopedia of operations research and management science , 2011 .

[43]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects , 2010 .

[44]  Manoj Kumar Tiwari,et al.  Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach , 2006, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[45]  Marco te Brömmelstroet,et al.  Equip the warrior instead of manning the equipment: Land use and transport planning support in the Netherlands , 2010 .

[46]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis , 2009 .

[47]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Learning For Action: A Short Definitive Account of Soft Systems Methodology, and its use for Practitioners, Teachers and Students , 2007 .

[48]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[49]  Douglas W. Mitchell,et al.  88.27 More on spreads and non-arithmetic means , 2004, The Mathematical Gazette.

[50]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple criteria decision analysis - an integrated approach , 2001 .

[51]  David Banister,et al.  Land Use and Transport: European Research Towards Integrated Policies , 2007 .

[52]  Christine Van Winkelen,et al.  Beyond words: Visual metaphors that can demonstrate comprehension of KM as a paradoxical activity system , 2011 .

[53]  Isabella Maria Lami Analytical decision-making methods for evaluating sustainable transport in European corridors , 2014 .

[54]  Anna Ostanello,et al.  Validation Aspects of a Prototype Solution Implementation to Solve a Complex MC Problem , 1997 .

[55]  J. Mustajoki,et al.  How to design and realize participation of stakeholders in MCDA processes? A framework for selecting an appropriate approach , 2015 .

[56]  Colin Eden,et al.  Strategic Options Development and Analysis , 2010, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[57]  Alexis Tsoukiàs,et al.  From decision theory to decision aiding methodology , 2008, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[58]  Roman Słowiński,et al.  Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method , 2013 .

[59]  José Ramón San Cristóbal Mateo,et al.  Multi-Criteria Analysis , 2012 .

[60]  T. Saaty,et al.  Procedures for Synthesizing Ratio Judgements , 1983 .

[61]  J. Mingers,et al.  Rational analysis for a problematic world revisited : problem structuring methods for complexity, uncertainty and conflict , 1989 .

[62]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  What's the Problem? An Introduction to Problem Structuring Methods , 1996 .

[63]  J. Bryson,et al.  Visible Thinking: Unlocking Causal Mapping for Practical Business Results , 2004 .

[64]  Mark Gahegan,et al.  Geovisualization for knowledge construction and decision support , 2004, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[65]  Petter Næss Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transportation Investments: Neither critical nor realistic , 2006 .

[66]  Guido Gentile,et al.  Section 7.5 - Dynamic traffic assignment with non separable link cost functions and queue spillovers , 2009 .

[67]  Stefano Pensa InViTo - GeoVisualizzazione Interattiva a Supporto dei Processi di Decisione Territoriale , 2013 .

[68]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An Analytic Network Process approach for siting a municipal solid waste plant in the Metropolitan Area of Valencia (Spain). , 2010, Journal of environmental management.

[69]  Petter Næss Cost-Benefit Analyses of Transportation Investments , 2006 .

[70]  P. C. Nutt,et al.  Handbook on Decision Making , 2010, Intelligent Systems Reference Library.

[71]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Theory and Applications of the Analytic Network Process: Decision Making With Benefits, Opportunities, Costs, and Risks , 2005 .

[72]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Facilitated modelling in operational research , 2010, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[73]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Evaluation Tools to Support Decision-Making Process Related to European Corridors , 2014 .

[74]  Jean-Louis Malouin,et al.  Model validation in operations research , 1983 .

[75]  Isabella Maria Lami,et al.  Seeing is knowing: data exploration as a support to planning , 2014 .

[76]  I. Lami,et al.  Decision making for urban solid waste treatment in the context of territorial conflict: Can the Analytic Network Process help? , 2014 .

[77]  John Stillwell,et al.  Planning Support Systems in Practice , 2003 .

[78]  Paul Schot,et al.  Bottlenecks Blocking Widespread Usage of Planning Support Systems , 2005 .

[79]  Richard E. Klosterman,et al.  Simple and Complex Models , 2012 .

[80]  Warren J. Hahn,et al.  Making decisions with multiple criteria: a case in energy sustainability planning , 2015 .

[81]  John Stillwell,et al.  Planning Support Systems Best Practice and New Methods , 2009 .

[82]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Systems Thinking, Systems Practice , 1981 .

[83]  Detlof von Winterfeldt,et al.  Providing a decision focus for global systems analysis , 2013 .

[84]  Elena Masala,et al.  What if form follows function? The exploration of suitability in the city of Skopje , 2013 .

[85]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Problem Structuring and Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2010, Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.

[86]  Igor Linkov,et al.  Multi-criteria decision analysis in environmental sciences: ten years of applications and trends. , 2011, The Science of the total environment.

[87]  Ennio Cascetta,et al.  Transportation Systems Analysis: Models and Applications , 2009 .

[88]  Theodor J. Stewart,et al.  Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis , 2001 .

[89]  Michael Batty,et al.  Planning Support Systems: Progress, Predictions, and Speculations on the Shape of Things to Come , 2007 .

[90]  Younghwa Lee,et al.  Investigating the effect of website quality on e-business success: An analytic hierarchy process (AHP) approach , 2006, Decis. Support Syst..

[91]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Decision Making in Complex Environments , 1984 .

[92]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[93]  Stefano Pensa,et al.  E se la forma seguisse la funzione? L’esplorazione della desiderabilità nella città di Skopje , 2013 .

[94]  Abbas S. Milani,et al.  An application of the analytic network process in multiple criteria material selection , 2013 .

[95]  Mongkut Piantanakulchai,et al.  Analytic network process model for landslide hazard zonation , 2006 .

[96]  Daniel A. Keim,et al.  Geovisual analytics for spatial decision support: Setting the research agenda , 2007, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..