How to use Psycholinguistic Methodologies for Comprehension and Production

2 How to Use Foreign and Second Language Learner Corpora 7 Sylviane Granger 3 Formal Theory-Based Methodologies 30 Tania Ionin 4 Instructed Second Language Acquisition 53 Shawn Loewen and Jenefer Philp 5 How to Design and Analyze Surveys in Second Language Acquisition Research 74 Zoltán Dörnyei and Kata Csizér 6 How to Carry Out Case Study Research 95 Patricia A. Duff 7 How to Use Psycholinguistic Methodologies for Comprehension and Production 117 Kim McDonough and Pavel Trofimovich 8 How to Research Second Language Writing 139 Charlene Polio 9 How to Do Research on Second Language Reading 158 Keiko Koda 10 How to Collect and Analyze Qualitative Data 180 Debra A. Friedman

[1]  R. Heredia,et al.  1 On-line methods in bilingual spoken language research , 2002 .

[2]  H. Hopp.  Syntactic features and reanalysis in near-native processing , 2006 .

[3]  J Barker,et al.  Semantic Factors in the Production of Number Agreement , 2001, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[4]  Paola E. Dussias.  SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION IN L2 LEARNERS , 2003, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[5]  Paul C. Amrhein,et al.  Phonological facilitation through translation in a bilingual picture-naming task , 2007, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[6]  M. Miozzo,et al.  Which words are activated during bilingual word production? , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[7]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Conceptual coherence affects phonological activation of context objects during object naming. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[8]  Jelmer P. Borst,et al.  Stroop and picture—word interference are two sides of the same coin , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[9]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[10]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Distractor modality can turn semantic interference into semantic facilitation in the picture-word interference task: implications for theories of lexical access in speech production. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[11]  John N. Williams,et al.  Native and non-native processing of English wh- questions: Parsing strategies and plausibility constraints , 2001, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[12]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆ , 1999 .

[13]  K. Bock.  Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[14]  David Caplan,et al.  Verbal Working Memory and on-Line Syntactic Processing: Evidence from self-Paced Listening , 2004, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[15]  Theodoros Marinis,et al.  Passive verb morphology: The effect of phonotactics on passive comprehension in typically developing and Grammatical-SLI children , 2007 .

[16]  Albert Costa,et al.  Phonological activation of ignored pictures: Further evidence for a cascade model of lexical access , 2005 .

[17]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Notional number agreement in English , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[18]  Margarita Kaushanskaya,et al.  Bilingual Language Processing and Interference in Bilinguals: Evidence From Eye Tracking and Picture Naming , 2007 .

[19]  F Ferreira,et al.  Exploring the use of prosody during language comprehension using the auditory moving window technique , 1996, Journal of psycholinguistic research.

[20]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Age-Related Impairments in the Revision of Syntactic Misanalyses: Effects of Prosody , 2006, Language and speech.

[21]  Qingfang Zhang,et al.  Independent Effects of Orthographic and Phonological Facilitation on Spoken Word Production in Mandarin , 2009, Language and speech.

[22]  B. MacWhinney,et al.  Developmental differences in visual and auditory processing of complex sentences. , 2000, Child development.

[23]  S. Garrod,et al.  Observations on the Past and Future of Psycholinguistics , 2006 .

[24]  Albert Costa,et al.  Lexical Selection in Bilinguals: Do Words in the Bilingual's Two Lexicons Compete for Selection? , 1999 .

[25]  C. Clifton,et al.  The independence of syntactic processing , 1986 .

[26]  Maryellen C. MacDonald,et al.  Plausibility and grammatical agreement , 2003 .

[27]  Albert Costa,et al.  Is lexical selection in bilingual speech production language-specific? Further evidence from Spanish–English and English–Spanish bilinguals , 1999, Bilingualism: Language and Cognition.

[28]  A. Wingfield,et al.  Resource allocation during spoken discourse processing: Effects of age and passage difficulty as revealed by self-paced listening , 2000, Memory & cognition.

[29]  D. O. Sears.  College sophomores in the laboratory: Influences of a narrow data base on social psychology's view of human nature. , 1986 .

[30]  Harald Clahsen,et al.  Children's Processing of Ambiguous Sentences: A Study of Relative Clause Attachment , 2003 .

[31]  G. Waters,et al.  On-line syntactic processing in aphasia: Studies with auditory moving window presentation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[32]  A. Rah,et al.  PROCESSING OF THE REDUCED RELATIVE CLAUSE VERSUS MAIN VERB AMBIGUITY IN L2 LEARNERS AT DIFFERENT PROFICIENCY LEVELS , 2010, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[33]  Zenzi M. Griffin,et al.  Properties of Spoken Language Production , 2006 .

[34]  Fernanda Ferreira,et al.  Syntax and Production , 2006 .

[35]  K Bock,et al.  Language production: Methods and methodologies , 1996, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[36]  Alan Juffs.  Main Verb Versus Reduced Relative Clause Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Sentence Processing , 1998 .

[37]  N. D. Jong.  CAN SECOND LANGUAGE GRAMMAR BE LEARNED THROUGH LISTENING?: An Experimental Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[38]  Carrie N. Jackson,et al.  The processing and comprehension of wh-questions among second language speakers of German , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[39]  J. Henderson,et al.  Effects of lexical frequency and syntactic complexity in spoken-language comprehension: Evidence from the auditory moving-window technique. , 1996 .

[40]  R. Job,et al.  The picture-word interference effect is not a Stroop effect , 2007, Psychonomic bulletin & review.