A Comparative Study between Two Regression Methods on LiDAR Data: A Case Study

Airborne LiDAR (Light Detection and Ranging) has become an excellent tool for accurately assessing vegetation characteristics in forest environments. Previous studies showed empirical relationships between LiDAR and field-measured biophysical variables. Multiple linear regression (MLR) with stepwise feature selection is the most common method for building estimation models. Although this technique has provided very interesting results, many other data mining techniques may be applied. The overall goal of this study is to compare different methodologies for assessing biomass fractions at stand level using airborne Li-DAR data in forest settings. In order to choose the best methodology, a comparison between two different feature selection techniques (stepwise selection vs. genetic-based selection) is presented. In addition, classical MLR is also compared with regression trees (M5P). The results when each methodology is applied to estimate stand biomass fractions from an area of northern Spain show that genetically-selected M5P obtains the best results.

[1]  R. Dubayah,et al.  Integrating waveform lidar with hyperspectral imagery for inventory of a northern temperate forest , 2008 .

[2]  F. M. Danson,et al.  Estimating biomass carbon stocks for a Mediterranean forest in central Spain using LiDAR height and intensity data , 2010 .

[3]  E. Næsset,et al.  Laser scanning of forest resources: the nordic experience , 2004 .

[4]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  The WEKA data mining software: an update , 2009, SKDD.

[5]  Philip A. Townsend,et al.  A pseudo-waveform technique to assess forest structure using discrete lidar data , 2011 .

[6]  B. Koch,et al.  Non-parametric prediction and mapping of standing timber volume and biomass in a temperate forest: application of multiple optical/LiDAR-derived predictors , 2010 .

[7]  J. Brasington,et al.  Object-based land cover classification using airborne LiDAR , 2008 .

[8]  A. Hudak,et al.  Nearest neighbor imputation of species-level, plot-scale forest structure attributes from LiDAR data , 2008 .

[9]  Jungho Im,et al.  An artificial immune network approach to multi-sensor land use/land cover classification , 2011 .

[10]  S. Popescu.  Estimating biomass of individual pine trees using airborne lidar , 2007 .

[11]  J. R. Quinlan.  Learning With Continuous Classes , 1992 .

[12]  I. Burke,et al.  Estimating stand structure using discrete-return lidar: an example from low density, fire prone ponderosa pine forests , 2005 .

[13]  Nicholas C. Coops,et al.  Simulation study for finding optimal lidar acquisition parameters for forest height retrieval , 2005 .

[14]  Sorin C. Popescu,et al.  Mapping surface fuel models using lidar and multispectral data fusion for fire behavior , 2008 .

[15]  Liviu Theodor Ene,et al.  Modelling tree diameter from airborne laser scanning derived variables: A comparison of spatial statistical models , 2010 .