Entropy and variability discrimination.

Two experiments examined college students' discrimination of complex visual displays that involved different degrees of variability or "entropy." Displays depicted 16 black and white line drawings of various types (e.g., a brain, a clock, a hand); the participants were required to classify a display in terms of its variability (e.g., a low-variability display contains many identical items, whereas a high-variability display contains few identical items). The participants' accuracy and reaction time scores on a 2-alternative forced-choice discrimination disclosed that people can and do use entropy to classify different levels of visual display variability. Individuals differed in their use of absolute rather than relative entropy.

[1]  A Treisman,et al.  Feature analysis in early vision: evidence from search asymmetries. , 1988, Psychological review.

[2]  G. A. Miller THE PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW THE MAGICAL NUMBER SEVEN, PLUS OR MINUS TWO: SOME LIMITS ON OUR CAPACITY FOR PROCESSING INFORMATION 1 , 1956 .

[3]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Entropy detection by pigeons: response to mixed visual displays after same-different discrimination training. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[4]  H. Roitblat,et al.  Comparative approaches to cognitive science , 1995 .

[5]  H J Müller,et al.  Visual search for singleton feature targets within and across feature dimensions , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  A. Nagy,et al.  Critical color differences determined with a visual search task. , 1990, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[7]  H. Nothdurft Feature analysis and the role of similarity in preattentive vision , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  R. B. Purtle Peak shift: A review. , 1973 .

[9]  H. Müller,et al.  Searching for unknown feature targets on more than one dimension: Investigating a “dimension-weighting” account , 1996, Perception & psychophysics.

[10]  Claude E. Shannon,et al.  The mathematical theory of communication , 1950 .

[11]  W. Hirst The making of cognitive science: Essays in honor of George A. Miller. , 1990 .

[12]  E. G. Heinemann,et al.  Analysis of stimulus generalization with a psychophysical method , 1969 .

[13]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Preattentive Object Files: Shapeless Bundles of Basic Features , 1997, Vision Research.

[14]  E. Wasserman,et al.  Effects of number of items on the pigeon's discrimination of same from different visual displays. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[15]  D. C. Donderi,et al.  Parallel processing in visual same-different decisions , 1969 .

[16]  E A Wasserman,et al.  Same-different conceptualization by baboons (Papio papio): the role of entropy. , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[17]  D. Gentner,et al.  Structure mapping in analogy and similarity. , 1997 .

[18]  J. H. Ward Hierarchical Grouping to Optimize an Objective Function , 1963 .

[19]  D. C. Donderi,et al.  Parallel visual processing: Constant same-different decision latency with two to fourteen shapes , 1970 .

[20]  J. Wolfe,et al.  Guided Search 2.0 A revised model of visual search , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.