Imaging the impossible: An fMRI study of impossible causal relationships in magic tricks☆

Understanding causal relationships and violations of those relationships is fundamental to learning about the world around us. Over time some of these relationships become so firmly established that they form part of an implicit belief system about what is possible and impossible in the world. Previous studies investigating the neural correlates of violations of learned relationships have focused on relationships that were task-specific and probabilistic. In contrast, the present study uses magic-trick perception as a means of investigating violations of relationships that are long-established, deterministic, and that form part of the aforementioned belief system. Compared to situations in which expected causal relationships are observed, magic trick perception recruited dorso-lateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC), brain regions associated with the detection of conflict and the implementation of cognitive control. These activations were greater in the left hemisphere, supporting a role for this hemisphere in the interpretation of complex events. DLPFC is more greatly activated by magic tricks than by surprising events, but not more greatly activated by surprising than non surprising events, suggesting that this region plays a special role in causality processing. The results suggest a role for cognitive control regions in the left hemisphere in a neurobiology of disbelief.

[1]  Ronald A. Rensink,et al.  Towards a science of magic , 2008, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Jeffrey M. Zacks,et al.  Neural correlates of incongruous visual information An event-related fMRI study , 2003, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Torrens Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain—3-Dimensional Proportional System: An Approach to Cerebral Imaging, J. Talairach, P. Tournoux. Georg Thieme Verlag, New York (1988), 122 pp., 130 figs. DM 268 , 1990 .

[4]  Paul J. Laurienti,et al.  An automated method for neuroanatomic and cytoarchitectonic atlas-based interrogation of fMRI data sets , 2003, NeuroImage.

[5]  Michael F. Land,et al.  There's more to magic than meets the eye , 2006, Current Biology.

[6]  J. Cohen,et al.  Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. , 2000, Science.

[7]  Vinod Goel,et al.  Neuroanatomical Correlates of Human Reasoning , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[8]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[9]  C. Frith,et al.  Involvement of rostral prefrontal cortex in selection between stimulus‐oriented and stimulus‐independent thought , 2005, The European journal of neuroscience.

[10]  Dietmar Görlitz,et al.  Perspectives on attribution research and theory : the Bielefeld symposium , 1980 .

[11]  John M. Findlay,et al.  Misdirection in magic: Implications for the relationship between eye gaze and attention , 2008 .

[12]  J. M. Anderson,et al.  Responses of human frontal cortex to surprising events are predicted by formal associative learning theory , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  T. Braver,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: effects of frequency, inhibition and errors. , 2001, Cerebral cortex.

[15]  H. Critchley Neural mechanisms of autonomic, affective, and cognitive integration , 2005, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  Mark S. Cohen,et al.  Functional neuroimaging of belief, disbelief, and uncertainty , 2008, Annals of neurology.

[17]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Functional Imaging of Decision Conflict , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Brain mechanisms underlying perceptual causality. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[19]  Ian R. Summers,et al.  The Role of the Lateral Prefrontal Cortex and Anterior Cingulate in Stimulus-Response Association Reversals , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[20]  T. Shallice,et al.  Human cingulate cortex and autonomic control: converging neuroimaging and clinical evidence. , 2003, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  M. Gazzaniga Cerebral specialization and interhemispheric communication: does the corpus callosum enable the human condition? , 2000, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  C. Carter,et al.  Anterior cingulate cortex and conflict detection: An update of theory and data , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[23]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Conflict and Cognitive Control in the Brain , 2006 .

[24]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Dissociating processes supporting causal perception and causal inference in the brain. , 2005, Neuropsychology.

[25]  Jonathan A. Fugelsang,et al.  Brain-based mechanisms underlying complex causal thinking , 2005, Neuropsychologia.

[26]  Marc Hauser,et al.  Wild rhesus monkeys generate causal inferences about possible and impossible physical transformations in the absence of experience. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[28]  Raymond J. Dolan,et al.  Anterior cingulate activity during error and autonomic response , 2005, NeuroImage.