Environmental Statistics and Optimal Regulation

Any organism is embedded in an environment that changes over time. The timescale for and statistics of environmental change, the precision with which the organism can detect its environment, and the costs and benefits of particular protein expression levels all will affect the suitability of different strategies–such as constitutive expression or graded response–for regulating protein levels in response to environmental inputs. We propose a general framework–here specifically applied to the enzymatic regulation of metabolism in response to changing concentrations of a basic nutrient–to predict the optimal regulatory strategy given the statistics of fluctuations in the environment and measurement apparatus, respectively, and the costs associated with enzyme production. We use this framework to address three fundamental questions: (i) when a cell should prefer thresholding to a graded response; (ii) when there is a fitness advantage to implementing a Bayesian decision rule; and (iii) when retaining memory of the past provides a selective advantage. We specifically find that: (i) relative convexity of enzyme expression cost and benefit influences the fitness of thresholding or graded responses; (ii) intermediate levels of measurement uncertainty call for a sophisticated Bayesian decision rule; and (iii) in dynamic contexts, intermediate levels of uncertainty call for retaining memory of the past. Statistical properties of the environment, such as variability and correlation times, set optimal biochemical parameters, such as thresholds and decay rates in signaling pathways. Our framework provides a theoretical basis for interpreting molecular signal processing algorithms and a classification scheme that organizes known regulatory strategies and may help conceptualize heretofore unknown ones.

[1]  Chi-Ying F. Huang,et al.  Ultrasensitivity in the mitogen-activated protein kinase cascade. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[2]  S. Leibler,et al.  Phenotypic Diversity, Population Growth, and Information in Fluctuating Environments , 2005, Science.

[3]  J. Doyle,et al.  Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[4]  U. Alon,et al.  Optimality and evolutionary tuning of the expression level of a protein , 2005, Nature.

[5]  Massimo Vergassola,et al.  ‘Infotaxis’ as a strategy for searching without gradients , 2007, Nature.

[6]  Wendell A Lim,et al.  Design principles of regulatory networks: searching for the molecular algorithms of the cell. , 2013, Molecular cell.

[7]  Uri Alon,et al.  Cost–benefit theory and optimal design of gene regulation functions , 2007, Physical biology.

[8]  H. Berg,et al.  Physics of chemoreception. , 1977, Biophysical journal.

[9]  P. Swain,et al.  Strategies for cellular decision-making , 2009, Molecular systems biology.

[10]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2002 .

[11]  J. Bähler,et al.  Tuning gene expression to changing environments: from rapid responses to evolutionary adaptation , 2008, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[12]  Albert Libchaber,et al.  Effects of population density and chemical environment on the behavior of Escherichia coli in shallow temperature gradients. , 2011, Physical biology.

[13]  Tetsuya J Kobayashi,et al.  Implementation of dynamic Bayesian decision making by intracellular kinetics. , 2010, Physical review letters.

[14]  Tanja Kortemme,et al.  Cost-Benefit Tradeoffs in Engineered lac Operons , 2012, Science.

[15]  J. Lisman A mechanism for memory storage insensitive to molecular turnover: a bistable autophosphorylating kinase. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  Michael J Rust,et al.  Light-Driven Changes in Energy Metabolism Directly Entrain the Cyanobacterial Circadian Oscillator , 2011, Science.

[17]  Paul Nurse,et al.  Life, logic and information , 2008, Nature.

[18]  Y. Pilpel,et al.  Adaptive prediction of environmental changes by microorganisms , 2009, Nature.

[19]  Susanne Still,et al.  The thermodynamics of prediction , 2012, Physical review letters.

[20]  S. Leibler,et al.  Robustness in simple biochemical networks , 1997, Nature.

[21]  James R Broach,et al.  How Saccharomyces responds to nutrients. , 2008, Annual review of genetics.

[22]  Maureen L. Coleman,et al.  Microbial community gene expression in ocean surface waters , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  R. Stocker Marine Microbes See a Sea of Gradients , 2012, Science.

[24]  U. Alon,et al.  Cost of unneeded proteins in E. coli is reduced after several generations in exponential growth. , 2010, Molecular cell.

[25]  Eva Jablonka,et al.  Epigenetic learning in non-neural organisms , 2009, Journal of Biosciences.

[26]  Megan N. McClean,et al.  Signal processing by the HOG MAP kinase pathway , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[27]  Greg Welch,et al.  An Introduction to Kalman Filter , 1995, SIGGRAPH 2001.

[28]  R. Milo,et al.  Variability and memory of protein levels in human cells , 2006, Nature.

[29]  J. Gunawardena Multisite protein phosphorylation makes a good threshold but can be a poor switch. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[30]  M. Thattai,et al.  Stochastic Gene Expression in Fluctuating Environments , 2004, Genetics.

[31]  P. Swain,et al.  Noisy information processing through transcriptional regulation , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[32]  Saeed Tavazoie,et al.  Predictive Behavior Within Microbial Genetic Networks , 2008, Science.