Learning curve with input price for tracking technical change in the energy transition process

Abstract Learning curve has been recognized as an effective tool for tracking the technological change and widely used in assisting policy design for energy technologies. But uncertainties underlying input price and learning rate would greatly influence the accuracy and reliability of learning curves. Regression to a learning curve using lead-acid price and production (between 1989 and 2013) yields a poor fit performance. This study then integrates cost decomposition with learning curve to remove the influences from input price changes in lead-acid batteries. Total lead-acid batteries' cost is decomposed into materials cost and residual cost. Materials cost is calculated through multiplying material consumption and its price to isolate the influences from input price changes. Learning curve is then constructed to trace the declines of materials consumption and residual cost. Regression with the improved learning curves performs better than a standard one, with the fit performance improved greatly. The study also indicates a learning effect in the material consumption in the long term. Integrating cost decomposition into learning curve is then proved to be a meaningful trial for mitigating the bias from input price changes. Learning rates of mature technologies such like lead-acid batteries indicate the importance to understand the cost reduction in them, which might significantly affect the policies’ performances for emerging ones.

[1]  James McNerney,et al.  Historical Costs of Coal-Fired Electricity and Implications for the Future , 2009 .

[2]  W.G.J.H.M. van Sark,et al.  Unraveling the photovoltaic technology learning curve by incorporation of input price changes and scale effects , 2011 .

[3]  Eric Williams,et al.  Residual learning rates in lead-acid batteries: Effects on emerging technologies , 2015 .

[4]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Interim monitoring of cost dynamics for publicly supported energy technologies , 2009 .

[5]  Michael D. Sohn,et al.  Experience curve development and cost reduction disaggregation for fuel cell markets in Japan and the US , 2017 .

[6]  David R. Wilburn,et al.  Apparent Consumption vs. Total Consumption--A Lead-Acid Battery Case Study , 2006 .

[7]  C. Rydh Environmental assessment of vanadium redox and lead-acid batteries for stationary energy storage , 1999 .

[8]  F. Ferioli,et al.  Use and limitations of learning curves for energy technology policy: A component-learning hypothesis , 2009 .

[9]  Gregory F. Nemet,et al.  Beyond the learning curve: factors influencing cost reductions in photovoltaics , 2006 .

[10]  Martin Kumar Patel,et al.  A review of experience curve analyses for energy demand technologies , 2010 .

[11]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  An alternative metafrontier framework for measuring the heterogeneity of technology , 2018, Naval Research Logistics (NRL).

[12]  Qiang Ji,et al.  Green innovation and firm performance: Evidence from listed companies in China , 2019, Resources, Conservation and Recycling.

[13]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Technological learning in bioenergy systems , 2006 .

[14]  Anand R. Gopal,et al.  The Impact of New Product Introduction on Plant Productivity in the North American Automotive Industry , 2013 .

[15]  P. Jaramillo,et al.  A review of learning rates for electricity supply technologies , 2015 .

[16]  E. Williams,et al.  Learning dependent subsidies for lithium-ion electric vehicle batteries , 2015 .

[17]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  Energy price, regulatory price distortion and economic growth: a case study of China , 2017 .

[18]  Nathan E. Hultman,et al.  A reactor-level analysis of busbar costs for US nuclear plants, 1970-2005 , 2007 .

[19]  André Faaij,et al.  Performance of batteries for electric vehicles on short and longer term , 2012 .

[20]  Qunwei Wang,et al.  Evaluating uncertain investment decisions in low-carbon transition toward renewable energy , 2019, Applied Energy.

[21]  Daniel M. Kammen,et al.  An innovation-focused roadmap for a sustainable global photovoltaic industry , 2014 .

[22]  B. Nykvist,et al.  Rapidly falling costs of battery packs for electric vehicles , 2015 .

[23]  M. Armand,et al.  Building better batteries , 2008, Nature.

[24]  William Burr,et al.  Learning curve theory and innovation , 2013 .

[25]  Alexandre Szklo,et al.  Designing learning curves for carbon capture based on chemical absorption according to the minimum work of separation , 2013 .

[26]  Richard Van Noorden The rechargeable revolution: A better battery , 2014, Nature.

[27]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Global experience curves for wind farms , 2005 .

[28]  Qiang Ji,et al.  How much does financial development contribute to renewable energy growth and upgrading of energy structure in China? , 2019, Energy Policy.

[29]  F. Lévy Adaptation in the Production Process , 1965 .

[30]  Xunpeng Shi,et al.  Assessment of instruments in facilitating investment in off-grid renewable energy projects , 2016 .

[31]  J. Vetrano,et al.  Grid Energy Storage , 2013 .

[32]  Leo Schrattenholzer,et al.  Learning rates for energy technologies , 2001 .

[33]  Mohamad Y. Jaber,et al.  Production , Manufacturing and Logistics Learning curves for processes generating defects requiring reworks , 2004 .

[34]  P. T. Moseley,et al.  Research results from the Advanced Lead–Acid Battery Consortium point the way to longer life and higher specific energy for lead/acid electric-vehicle batteries , 1998 .

[35]  David Linden,et al.  Linden's Handbook of Batteries , 2010 .

[36]  Hao Wang,et al.  Modeling technological learning and its application for clean coal technologies in Japan , 2011 .

[37]  Fushuan Wen,et al.  Development of variable renewable energy policy in developing countries: A case study of Sri Lanka , 2018 .

[38]  V. V. Bayunov,et al.  Relative cost of storage batteries , 2010 .

[39]  Karin Ibenholt Explaining learning curves for wind power , 2002 .