Perceptual learning of oriented gratings as revealed by classification images.

Classification image analysis is a psychophysical technique in which noise components of stimuli are analyzed to produce an image that reveals critical features of a task. Here we use classification images to gain greater understanding of perceptual learning. To achieve reasonable classification images within a single session, we developed an efficient classification image procedure that employed designer noise and a low-dimensional stimulus space. Subjects were trained across ten sessions to detect the orientation of a grating masked in noise, with an eleventh, test, session conducted using a stimulus orthogonal to the trained stimulus. As with standard perceptual learning studies, subjects showed improvements in performance metrics of accuracy, threshold, and reaction times. The clarity of the classification images and their correlation to an ideal target also improved across training sessions in an orientation-specific manner. Furthermore, image-based analyses revealed aspects of performance that could not be observed with standard performance metrics. Subjects with threshold improvements learned to use pixels across a wider area of the image, and, apposed to subjects without threshold improvements, showed improvements in both the bright and dark parts of the image. We conclude that classification image analysis is an important complement to traditional metrics of perceptual learning.

[1]  Zili Liu,et al.  Computing dynamic classification images from correlation maps. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[2]  D. Scott.  Perceptual learning. , 1974, Queen's nursing journal.

[3]  M. Fahle.  Perceptual learning: a case for early selection. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[4]  D H Brainard,et al.  The Psychophysics Toolbox. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[5]  Roger W Li,et al.  Perceptual learning improves efficiency by re-tuning the decision 'template' for position discrimination , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Philip J. Kellman,et al.  Classification images reveal spatiotemporal contour interpolation , 2007, Vision Research.

[7]  Z L Lu,et al.  Perceptual learning reflects external noise filtering and internal noise reduction through channel reweighting. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[8]  J. Mollon,et al.  Three remarks on perceptual learning. , 1996, Spatial vision.

[9]  P. Bennett,et al.  Inversion Leads to Quantitative, Not Qualitative, Changes in Face Processing , 2004, Current Biology.

[10]  D G Pelli,et al.  The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: transforming numbers into movies. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[11]  G. Orban,et al.  Practising orientation identification improves orientation coding in V1 neurons , 2001, Nature.

[12]  S. Hochstein,et al.  The reverse hierarchy theory of visual perceptual learning , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  J. Victor.  Analyzing receptive fields, classification images and functional images: challenges with opportunities for synergy , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[14]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  A common framework for perceptual learning , 2007, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[15]  S. Klein,et al.  Complete Transfer of Perceptual Learning across Retinal Locations Enabled by Double Training , 2008, Current Biology.

[16]  C. Law,et al.  Neural correlates of perceptual learning in a sensory-motor, but not a sensory, cortical area , 2008, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  R. Shapley,et al.  The use of m-sequences in the analysis of visual neurons: Linear receptive field properties , 1997, Visual Neuroscience.

[18]  A. Fiorentini,et al.  Perceptual learning specific for orientation and spatial frequency , 1980, Nature.

[19]  Aaron R. Seitz,et al.  Rewards Evoke Learning of Unconsciously Processed Visual Stimuli in Adult Humans , 2009, Neuron.

[20]  N. Dupuis-Roy,et al.  Perceptual learning without signal , 2007, Vision Research.

[21]  R. Sekuler,et al.  A specific and enduring improvement in visual motion discrimination. , 1982, Science.

[22]  Miguel P Eckstein,et al.  The temporal dynamics of selective attention of the visual periphery as measured by classification images. , 2007, Journal of vision.

[23]  Michael H. Herzog,et al.  Interleaving bisection stimuli – randomly or in sequence – does not disrupt perceptual learning, it just makes it more difficult , 2009, Vision Research.

[24]  A. Ahumada.  Classification image weights and internal noise level estimation. , 2002, Journal of vision.

[25]  A. B. Sekuler,et al.  Signal but not noise changes with perceptual learning , 1999, Nature.

[26]  Steven C Dakin,et al.  Dynamic properties of orientation discrimination assessed by using classification images. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  Mitsuo Kawato,et al.  Effect of spatial distance to the task stimulus on task-irrelevant perceptual learning of static Gabors. , 2007, Journal of vision.