Source characterization from ambient measurements of aerosol optical properties

A general method to identify air masses impacted by distinct primary aerosol sources from in situ observations of optical properties of atmospheric aerosols is developed theoretically and tested against measurements made during the second New England Air Quality Study (NEAQS 2004) on board the NOAA R/V Ronald H. Brown. Distinct events are identified based on the observation of a temporal coherence in the relationship between a measured intensive optical property (i.e., single scatter albedo) and the extensive property of total light absorption of the sub‐micron aerosol. We show that this relationship can be used to differentiate between and quantitatively determine properties of the background aerosol and recent inputs of primary aerosol. Additionally, we show that the fraction of aerosol extinction (or aerosol mass) from primary emissions can be estimated from the albedo‐absorption relationship. During the NEAQS 2004 study, the primary aerosol was usually found to be highly absorbing, and thus likely to be derived from anthropogenic combustion sources. Overall primary aerosol contributed a relatively small amount (ca. 11%) to the total sub‐micron aerosol burden sampled onboard R/V Ron Brown.

[1]  A. Stohl,et al.  Impacts of sources and aging on submicrometer aerosol properties in the marine boundary layer across the Gulf of Maine , 2006 .

[2]  T. Kirchstetter,et al.  Aerosol Properties and Chemical Apportionment of Aerosol Optical Depth at Locations off the U.S. East Coast in July and August 2001 , 2005 .

[3]  D. Blake,et al.  The impact of local sources and long‐range transport on aerosol properties over the northeast U.S. region during INTEX‐NA , 2008 .

[4]  A. Stohl,et al.  Technical note: The Lagrangian particle dispersion model FLEXPART version 6.2 , 2005 .

[5]  Vincent R. Gray.  Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis Summary for Policymakers , 2007 .

[6]  P. Hobbs,et al.  Airborne measurements of carbonaceous aerosols on the East Coast of the United States , 1997 .

[7]  A. Stohl,et al.  Biomass burning and anthropogenic sources of CO over New England in the summer 2004 , 2005 .

[8]  J. Hansen,et al.  Radiative forcing and climate response , 1997 .

[9]  P. Quinn,et al.  Aerosol optical properties during the 2004 New England Air Quality Study-Intercontinental Transport and Chemical Transformation: Gulf of Maine surface measurements—Regional and case studies , 2006 .

[10]  S. Solomon.  The Physical Science Basis : Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change , 2007 .

[11]  W. P. Arnott,et al.  Strong spectral variation of biomass smoke light absorption and single scattering albedo observed with a novel dual-wavelength photoacoustic instrument , 2008 .

[12]  Andrew J. Kean,et al.  Long-term changes in emissions of nitrogen oxides and particulate matter from on-road gasoline and diesel vehicles , 2008 .

[13]  R. Draxler.  HYSPLIT (HYbrid Single-Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory) Model access via NOAA ARL READY Website , 2010 .

[14]  Jim Haywood,et al.  Evolution of biomass burning aerosol properties from an agricultural fire in southern Africa , 2003 .

[15]  Steven J. Ghan,et al.  Aerosol Properties and Processes: A Path from Field and Laboratory Measurements to Global Climate Models , 2007 .

[16]  S. Howell,et al.  Biomass burning and pollution aerosol over North America: Organic components and their influence on spectral optical properties and humidification response , 2007 .