Satellite and in situ monitoring data used for modeling of forest vegetation reflectance

As climatic variability and anthropogenic stressors are growing up continuously, must be defined the proper criteria for forest vegetation assessment. In order to characterize current and future state of forest vegetation satellite imagery is a very useful tool. Vegetation can be distinguished using remote sensing data from most other (mainly inorganic) materials by virtue of its notable absorption in the red and blue segments of the visible spectrum, its higher green reflectance and, especially, its very strong reflectance in the near-IR. Vegetation reflectance has variations with sun zenith angle, view zenith angle, and terrain slope angle. To provide corrections of these effects, for visible and near-infrared light, was used a developed a simple physical model of vegetation reflectance, by assuming homogeneous and closed vegetation canopy with randomly oriented leaves. A simple physical model of forest vegetation reflectance was applied and validated for Cernica forested area, near Bucharest town through two ASTER satellite data , acquired within minutes from one another ,a nadir and off-nadir for band 3 lying in the near infra red, most radiance differences between the two scenes can be attributed to the BRDF effect. Other satellite data MODIS, Landsat TM and ETM as well as, IKONOS have been used for different NDVI and classification analysis.

[1]  Jesslyn F. Brown,et al.  Measuring phenological variability from satellite imagery , 1994 .

[2]  Geoffrey M. Henebry,et al.  Land surface phenology and temperature variation in the International Geosphere–Biosphere Program high‐latitude transects , 2005 .

[3]  T. Williams,et al.  OBTAINING SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL VEGETATION DATA FROM LANDSAT MSS AND AVHRR/NOAA SATELLITE IMAGES FOR A HYDROLOGIC MODEL , 1997 .

[4]  A. Strahler,et al.  Climate controls on vegetation phenological patterns in northern mid‐ and high latitudes inferred from MODIS data , 2004 .

[5]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A Directional Multispectral Forest Reflectance Model , 2000 .

[6]  Larry Biehl,et al.  Calibration Procedures For Measurement Of Reflectance Factor In Remote Sensing Field Research , 1979, Optics & Photonics.

[7]  Bradley C. Reed,et al.  Remote Sensing Phenology , 2009 .

[8]  T. Carlson,et al.  On the relation between NDVI, fractional vegetation cover, and leaf area index , 1997 .

[9]  F. Baret,et al.  Potentials and limits of vegetation indices for LAI and APAR assessment , 1991 .

[10]  M. Zoran Satellite Remote Sensing For Spatio‐Temporal Changes Analysis Of Urban Surface Biogeophysical Parameters , 2010 .

[11]  Andres Kuusk,et al.  Simulation of the reflectance of ground vegetation in sub-boreal forests , 2004 .

[12]  Ramakrishna R. Nemani,et al.  A global framework for monitoring phenological responses to climate change , 2005 .

[13]  Bernard Pinty,et al.  Understanding the biosphere from space: Strategies to exploit remote sensing data , 1994 .

[14]  Rob J Hyndman,et al.  Detecting trend and seasonal changes in satellite image time series , 2010 .

[15]  John R. Dymond,et al.  Reflection of visible light from a dense vegetation canopy—a physical model , 1997 .