Vocabulary Instruction for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Review of the Research

This article reviews research on vocabulary interventions involving students with learning disabilities. The purpose of the review was to summarize the findings of vocabulary intervention research and to present implications for vocabulary instruction. The studies were analyzed based on the following intervention research variables: word selection procedure, materials, instructional design and procedures, duration of the intervention, mastery criterion, measures of vocabulary learning (word knowledge level and reading comprehension), maintenance, and generalization (reading comprehension). Based on the selection criteria, six articles spanning the period from 1978 to the present were identified. Vocabulary interventions were categorized into four areas, computer-assisted instruction (CAI), fluency-building vocabulary practice activities, mnemonic strategy instruction, and concept enhancement instruction. Overall, positive results were found for the interventions on measures of immediate recall, maintenance, and generalization.

[1]  Steven A. Stahl.  Three Principles of Effective Vocabulary Instruction. , 1986 .

[2]  P. David Pearson.  Handbook of reading research. , 1990 .

[3]  Margaret G. McKeown.  Creating Effective Definitions for Young Word Learners. , 1993 .

[4]  Ernest T. Pascarella,et al.  The Effects of Instruction Using Semantic Mapping on Vocabulary and Comprehension , 1982 .

[5]  Deborah C. Simmons,et al.  The Effect of Task Alternatives on Vocabulary Knowledge: A Comparison of Students With and Without Learning Disabilities , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[6]  Thomas E. Scruggs,et al.  Teaching Abstract Vocabulary with the Keyword Method: , 1990, Journal of learning disabilities.

[7]  Michael Pressley,et al.  Cognitive Strategy Instruction that Really Improves Children's Academic Performance. Cognitive Strategy Training Series. Second Edition. , 1990 .

[8]  Susan D. Pittelman.  An Investigation of Two Instructional Settings in the Use of Semantic Mapping with Poor Readers. Program Report 85-4. , 1985 .

[9]  M M Condus,et al.  Effects of the Keyword Mnemonic Strategy on Vocabulary Acquisition and Maintenance by Learning Disabled Children , 1986, Journal of learning disabilities.

[10]  J. Levin,et al.  Mnemonic Vocabulary Instruction for Learning Disabled Students , 1985 .

[11]  C. Bos,et al.  Effects of Interactive Vocabulary Instruction on the Vocabulary Learning and Reading Comprehension of Junior-High Learning Disabled Students , 1990 .

[12]  G. McCloskey.  Wide Range Achievement Test-Revised , 1987 .

[13]  J. Levin,et al.  The keyword method and children's vocabulary learning: An interaction with vocabulary knowledge , 1983 .

[14]  Scott K. Baker.  Vocabulary Acquisition: Curricular and Instructional Implications for Diverse Learners. Technical Report No. 14. , 1995 .

[15]  D. Carnine.  Utilization of Contextual Information in Determining the Meaning of Unfamiliar Words. , 1984 .

[16]  Steven A. Stahl,et al.  The Effects of Vocabulary Instruction: A Model-Based Meta-Analysis , 1986 .

[17]  William E. Nagy,et al.  Teaching Vocabulary to Improve Reading Comprehension , 1988 .

[18]  Asha K. Jitendra,et al.  Mathematical Word-Problem-Solving Instruction for Students with Mild Disabilities and Students at Risk for Math Failure , 1997 .

[19]  D. Carnine,et al.  Effects of instructional Design Variables on Vocabulary Acquisition of LD Students , 1987, Journal of learning disabilities.

[20]  Margaret G. McKeown,et al.  Conditions of Vocabulary Acquisition , 1991 .

[21]  T. Lovitt,et al.  Vocabulary Intervention for Secondary-Level Youth , 1992 .