Bowman has developed a theory which claims that a manager makes good decisions on the average but that he may exhibit a high variance in his behavior. This paper proposes three general criteria which must be satisfied for this theory to have validity. These tests are then used to evaluate a production planning model for an electronics firm where the rules are based on “average” past behavior. Several interesting results emerge when comparing the production plans based on an “average” rule with the actual plans for the company. When the manager has limited information regarding future sales, as when he develops his initial production estimates, then a plan based on average behavior performs considerably better than actual initial plans. However, when environmental cues provide reliable information on future sales of specific items as when revisions are made then actual decisions are clearly superior to those suggested by an average rule. This case study offers insight into the potential usefulness as well as the limitations of Bowman's hypothesis. Suggestions for future research in this general area conclude the discussion.
[1]
L. D. Pankoff,et al.
Bayesian synthesis of clinical and statistical prediction.
,
1968
.
[2]
C. C. Holt,et al.
Planning Production, Inventories, and Work Force.
,
1962
.
[3]
J. Wolfowitz,et al.
An Introduction to the Theory of Statistics
,
1951,
Nature.
[4]
J. Tobin.
Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables
,
1958
.
[5]
Curtis H. Jones.
Parametric Production Planning
,
1967
.
[6]
E. H. Bowman.
Consistency and Optimality in Managerial Decision Making
,
1963
.
[7]
John Robert Meehan Gordon,et al.
A multi-model analysis of an aggregate scheduling decision
,
1966
.
[8]
DAVID G. KENDALL,et al.
Introduction to Mathematical Statistics
,
1947,
Nature.
[9]
J. Wolfowitz,et al.
Introduction to the Theory of Statistics.
,
1951
.
[10]
E. Gerald Hurst,et al.
Heuristic Scheduling in a Woolen Mill
,
1967
.